Aguirre, Jerjes, and Hugo Amador Herrera. "Institutional Weakness and Organized Crime in Mexico: The Case of Michoacán." Trends in Organized Crime 16.2 (2013): 221-38. Web. In the case of Mexico, the prevalence of organized crime and drug trafficking can be explained more as a consequence of the weak and insufficient institutional bureaucracy that impedes the application of the law than the demand for narcotics in the United States. In this context, a study was undertaken in the state of Michoacán, Mexico, the state where one of the most violent criminal groups, Los Caballeros Templarios (the Knights Templar), a splinter group of La Familia Michoacána (the family Michoacán), is located. This article, which draws upon LaFree’s ‘social control’ …show more content…
"Lift-Off for Mexico? Crime and Finance in Money Laundering Governance Structures." Journal of Money Laundering Control 18.1 (2015): 17-33. Web. Wojcik, Mark E., et al. "mexico." International Lawyer 44.1 (2010): 701. Web. Purpose – The purpose of this article is to analyse Mexico’s money laundering governance with a focus on its 2007-2013 reform process. It provides a view of money laundering governance as a politically contested policy area and a reflection on the reach and purpose of the international regime promoted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Design/methodology/approach – The analysis uses an actor-centred approach on governance structures relating groups of public and private actors with competing policy preferences. Findings – Three ideal-typical groups of actors are identified. Of these, the Financial Integrity and Criminal Enforcement Groups were central proponents of prevention- and prosecution-based policies, respectively. While criminal enforcement was initially sidelined, its role was strengthened in Mexico since 2007. Despite early signs of success, diverging policy preferences between these groups continue to complicate money laundering governance in Mexico through a complex distribution of tasks between them. Practical implications – To address wider crime fighting concerns, more emphasis should be put on the role of prosecutorial actors in money laundering governance. Beyond the domestic level, the results raise concerns about …show more content…
"Laws and Injustice: Fighting for Human Rights in Mexico." New Politics.3 (2007): 74-9. Web. The system administration and enforcement of justice in Mexico is deeply questioned. Very few people rely on the ability and ethics in the conduct of the police, the public prosecutor and the judges, and the three areas, namely, public safety, law enforcement and the administration of justice faced a perception citizen pointing inefficiency and corruption. Certainly, building a democratic welfare state requires a legitimate authority in the eyes of the public, because otherwise it is very difficult to build a framework of legitimacy and in which each and every one can recognize, without haggling, which is always preferable to confront obey the