ipl-logo

Outline For Ernie The Process Of Jury Defense

1167 Words5 Pages

a. Outline for Ernie the process his trial will follow:

Jury Selection: The jury selection phase of the trial will begin. A fair jury will be chosen after both the prosecution and defence counsel have had a chance to background check potential jurors.

Opening Statements: After the jury's selection, each side will present their opening argument. The defence will lay out their plan of attack after the prosecution presents their theory of the case.

Presentation of Evidence: In order to try to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution will first present its case. This evidence may include witnesses, records, and forensic data. After then, the defence will get a chance to question the witnesses for the prosecution.

Defense's Case: …show more content…

The defence might provide evidence to establish that Ernie had a good basis to believe he was about to suffer serious physical harm or death and that taking action to defend himself was required. The defence would have to show that Ernie's use of force was reasonable in relation to the perceived danger.

Another line of defence is to claim that Bert's death was the result of an accident or misadventure. Evidence for the defence can be used to demonstrate that Ernie had no desire to harm Bert and that the incident was a surprise accident. The success of this defence depends on proving that Ernie acted without malice or a murderous purpose.

d. The jury finds Ernie guilty of second-degree murder. Identify and explain the various factors the judge must consider when sentencing Ernie. Include your detailed statement to the judge regarding the sentence you believe is most appropriate in this case.

The judge must take into account a number of factors while deciding Ernie's sentence for second-degree murder in order to guarantee a just and equitable punishment. Among these factors are:

Severity of the Crime: The judge will weigh the seriousness of the crime, considering the harm done to Bert, the victim, and the effects on Bert's family and

Show More
Related

Memorandum: Aggravated Mayhem Charge Against Harvey Brewer

692 Words | 3 Pages

Id. at 832. The court described the attack as cold, calm, and deliberate and held that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to reasonably infer the specific intent for aggravated mayhem. Id. at

Read More

David Elderidge Murder Essay

463 Words | 2 Pages

David Elderidge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defendant claims that he is not guilty, they are wrong because Mr. Elderidge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes, the spatula that killed Mr. Armes had Mr. Elderidge’s fingerprints on it, and Mr. Elderidge was seen at the crime scene by William Warden shortly before Mr. Armes’s death. The first reason in the case was that Mr. Eldridge had a motive to kill Mr. Armes. Sandy Smith testified Mr. Eldridge was in desperate need of money because the bank would repossess his home.

Read More

Mr. Eldridge Should Not Be Found Guilty Of Murder

416 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should not be found guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution claims he is guilty, they are wrong because Barbara Wheeler had motive to murder him, for the recipe, his fingerprints were on the spatula because he took it home and cleaned it, and his footprints were not in the blood around Mr. Armes. To begin, Barbara Wheeler had a motive to murder Mr. Armes. Three days after Mr. Armes death occurred Ms. Wheeler had posted a recipe very similar to Mr. Armes. She also has admitted that she wanted to sabotage Mr. Armes restaurant, and steal his recipes.

Read More

Lizzie Borden Research Paper

785 Words | 4 Pages

Before that jury of twelve men, Moody opened the state's case. The witnesses described the things that happen before and after the murder and stuff. After talking about the things that happen and the suspicious things that Lizzie did before or after the murder. The jury deliberated an hour and a half before returning with its verdict. The clerk asked the foreman of the jury, "What is your verdict?"

Read More

Guilty Of The Paul Simpson Case

112 Words | 1 Pages

Members of the jury, Today Sean and I will be representing the prosecution .We will be providing information, and evidence against Paul Dickson proving that he murdered Jim Kendall. Throughout the case you will hear testimonies from close friends,family,experts in their field and the accused that will show that Jim Kendall 's death was not an accident ,but instead a cold hearted premeditated murder. Paul Dickson, who was madly in love with Julie Gregg, committed the murder after finding out Jim Kendall had played a joke on Julie. At the conclusion of the case, the facts will prove beyond doubt that Paul is Guilty and should be charged with 1st degree premeditated murder.

Read More

Rhetorical Strategies In To Kill A Mockingbird And 12 Angry Men

526 Words | 3 Pages

He argues that there is reasonable doubt in the case and that the accused might not be guilty. Juror #8's credibility is further strengthened when he produces a similar knife that the accused used to kill the victim and shows that the knife is not as unique as the prosecution claimed it to

Read More

James Richardson's Innocence

927 Words | 4 Pages

This shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing

Read More

How Does Rose Kill Her Roommate

810 Words | 4 Pages

The purpose of this paper is to help Rose’s attorney out for her Appellate Review. Rose was convicted of killing her roommate. There are a lot of issues regarding this case and there is a big possibility that Rose is innocent. While reviewing the case I find out that there were issues with the jurors which should have resulted in a Batson challenge. Another issue was the whether or not it was beneficial for Rose to take the plea.

Read More

Jurors Are Not Guilty In Twelve Angry Men

644 Words | 3 Pages

Davis, the first juror to vote not guilty, ignored his emotional attachment to the first-degree murder case and thought purely around the evidence the boy and the witnesses provided to the court. The other jurors said, “eleven men and you think he’s guilty, nobody has to think about it twice except you.” They said this in accordance to system 1 and original response to the stories told in the court. Otherwise, not once did Mr. Davis refer to system 1 through laziness. Mr. Davis spent the entirety of that hot day in a room with eleven other men, spending every second he had on convincing them of the potential error that could have been made in convicting the young boy.

Read More

Rawl's Veil Of Ignorance Case Study

1405 Words | 6 Pages

I will also be applying the Potter Box Model of Reasoning by explaining every detail of his case and exploring the values, the principles and the loyalties that lie within this wrongful conviction

Read More

Comparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System

478 Words | 2 Pages

Today, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Read More

12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis

851 Words | 4 Pages

The judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.

Read More

Summary Of 12 Angry Men

855 Words | 4 Pages

Every one of the legal hearers assume the conspicuous blame of the litigant, whom we learn has been blamed for slaughtering his dad. The twelve take a seat and a vote is taken. The greater part of the members of the jury vote "Guilty," with the exception of the Eighth Juror, who votes "Not Guilty," which, because of the prerequisite of a consistent jury, constrains them to talk about the case. The members of the jury respond brutally against this contradicting vote.

Read More

Movie Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

1206 Words | 5 Pages

The people’s sympathy and concern for this young man’s life was the main goal in this murder trial. When he convinces the other jurors to talk it over for another hour, Juror eight also exemplifies the foot-in-the-door approach. In additional to the above tactics, he

Read More

12 Angry Men Case Study

858 Words | 4 Pages

In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

Read More

More about Outline For Ernie The Process Of Jury Defense

Related Topics

Open Document