More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of PPACA
Strengths and weaknesses of PPACA
Similarities and differences of managed care, medicare and medicaid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of PPACA
By accommodating to these changes the organization to better serve a greater population at a greater level of quality. Laws and policies also have impacted the organization, such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The ACA allowed more patients to have access of healthcare services, driving the demand for health care services higher. This called for the need to increase supplies and staff for the organization. With the ever-changing technology updates, the organization must keep up to date to provide the best quality of care available which can cost an organization extra time and
Although, PPACA provides healthcare to everyone, in order to get money to insure all of these people, new taxes were created. The people who suffer the most are the ones that barley miss the Federal Poverty Level and can hardly afford the cost of living, much less having to pay for healthcare. With PPACA, the insurance companies must cover sick people and this causes everyone 's insurance cost to rise. Health insurance offered by businesses can be expensive, this means that lower wage workers might not be able to afford coverage and cannot get cost assistance. With this being said PPACA should be
Many people believe healthcare reform is a bad idea and that the government should stay away from healthcare. However, there are many other people who believe that it is a great thing that the government got involved, and created programs to register for mandatory health-care. In, “Healthcare Reform 101”, author Rick Panning discusses some of the main goals of the Affordable Healthcare Act, which are universality, financing, cost reduction, payment reform, quality and process improvement, prevention and wellness.
“Healthcare Reform 101,” written by Rick Panning (2014), is a wonderful article that describes, in an easy-to-understand language, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law March 23, 2010. The main goal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was to provide affordable, quality healthcare to Americans while simultaneously reducing some of the country’s economic problems. Two areas will be covered throughout this paper. The first section will include a summary of the major points and highlights of Panning’s (2014) article, including an introduction to the ACA, goals of the signed legislation, provided coverage, and downfalls of the current healthcare system. The second part will be comprised of a professional
The Affordable Care Act or “Obamacare” has constituted one of the most important topics since its implementation in 2010. Since 2010, the fate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been uncertain. The ACA was a historic achievement for the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats. But it passed Congress without a single Republican vote, and the GOP subsequently mounted legal and legislative challenges to Obamacare, vowing to repeal and replace it. (Oberlander, 2012, p.2165).
A Supreme Court justice, with the abundant resources of a full-time staff challenged with researching the cases they are handling, would have much more quality information about the PPACA than the average American citizen. They are able to have their staffs look up all of the relevant information regarding health care, previous rulings, who would be affected, and how it ties into the Constitution. Being educated individuals, working in Washington, the staff members have the experience and political knowledge to know biased and unbiased information. Also, the information that the Supreme Court justice receives would likely come from a very reliable source versus the American public that often times receives and retains information from a biased source. The most important information pertaining to the Supreme Court justice would whether or not the law contradicts the Constitution, as compared to the average American citizen only looking out for one’s self and the interest of their particular party.
Because of reviewing the “Political Irony” and comparing the lesson it made me review and question several factors in the PPACA legislation what and how does this legislation offer Americans? As I view health care where it stands today, where it has mitigated from in the past decade it baffles my mind. It was in the 1960’s, when Lyndon B. Johnson brought about the first change for Americans health care to a system that required help. Medicare was implemented under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide health insurance to people age 65 and older, regardless of income or medical history due to its price and its unaffordability by people over the age of 65. In that same year under the Social Security Amendments of 1965 Medicaid
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law in March of 2010. Assess the effectiveness of the PPACA in the past year both for a person and for the nation, declare an opinion of whether the law is good for the economy or bad for the economy, and finally - from a health policy perspective, suggest if any changes need to be made to the law in the future, what those changes should be, and why. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or, colloquially, Obamacare, is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. The comprehensive health care reform law enacted in March 2010.
A Second Look at the Affordable Care Act David E. Mann, ABA American Military University POLS210 Abstract Since the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), twenty-eight states have either filed joint or individual lawsuits to strike down the PPACA. This document will examine a few key elements that the President of the United States must take into consideration when reviewing the act and moving forward to either ratify the act, replace the act, or leave the act as it is. Topics that will be presented will include; the current issues being debated, two competing thoughts on how to fix the ACA, an evaluation of the preferred solution, and finally the responsibility of each level of government. Patient
The Affordable Care Act program is a result of decades of ideas from both political parties and the healthcare industry. ( http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-facts/ 1). In this research paper I will discuss the pros and cons of this very controversial Health Insurance Plan that I firmly believe that every American should have. There are many pros to Obamacare that make it a more considerable
The Health Care Choice Act of 2017 (HCCA) is legislation designed to modify US policy related to the federal approach to health care. HCCA is designed to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and some provisions of the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. HCCA also addresses the Public Health Service Act (PHCA) to support interstate healthcare coverage where a health insurer can insure from one state to an individual in another, and that the laws of the health insurer’s state are the laws which apply. The law exempts insurers from the laws of the secondary state (the state of an insured, if they live in another state than the insurer) (“H.R. 314”, 2017). The primary state has jurisdiction to regulate
On the other hand, supporters show through statistics that Medicaid, with the latest addition of Obamacare, has benefited up to 17 million Americans since 2013. The big improvement allowed many people to be insured under the health care umbrella, they argue. Furthermore, ACA has drastically reduced the amount of people without health insurance in half a century. Despite the growth of people insured with Obamacare, the latest study by Moody’s Investors Service claims that nonprofit hospitals under this expanded Medicaid are unsatisfied with the results thus far. Instead of a result of reduced debt and monetary progress at hospitals, they face unpaid bills, and Americans paying out of their own pockets, the study says.
Many Americans were led to believe that the introduction of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2009 would put an end to disparities in health care access. While it did improve the situation for a small percentage of the population there are still many Americans who lack access to good quality health care. Health care access in America is determined by money and those in lower socioeconomic groups frequently tend to miss out on adequate care. In a recent health care report by the national health research foundation Kaiser Family Foundation, it was noted “health care disparities remain a persistent problem in the United States, leading to certain groups being at higher risk of being uninsured, having limited access to care, and experiencing poorer quality of care” (Kaiser Family Foundation). The current health care
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
The case study presents many failures of public administration. Among these are bureaucracy, communication failures, recruitment of unskilled officials, overlap of power between agencies, negligence and corruption. The bureaucratization and hierarchization of the government agencies linked in the case slowed down the processes and compliance with the norm. The flow of letters and reports between agencies took a long time to scale the case to agencies with superior power. It is important to highlight that, thanks to the action of the inspector and the group of workers, the case reached high-ranking agencies, but middle-ranking officials.
