ipl-logo

Partial Legal Defense Of Provocation In Queensland's Criminal Justice System

1370 Words6 Pages

The partial legal defence of provocation in Queensland’s criminal justice system exists to protect a person who has been charged with a criminal offence if they were provoked into committing the criminal offence. The defence aims to protect the accused by reducing their sentence if their actions are considered a reasonable reaction to being provoked. The defence of provocation is not justifiable in its current state, as it does not meet the expectations of modern society.
While the defence has already undergone reforms, in consideration of criticisms, these have been ineffective in causing the defence to be fair and justifiable, showing its need for reform. As law of provocation is outdated and was created under different social expectations, …show more content…

This can be seen in the case of Singh v R. (Sing v R [2012] NSWSC 637, 7 June 2012) In this case the accused was charged with the murder of his wife. The sentence provided would have been for murder, with a mandatory imprisonment time of life in prison, both in Queensland and New South Wales, were the case was heard. He was able to raise the defence of provocation, as he claimed he was provoked into committing the crime because she had been insulting him prior to the offence. The resulting sentence, due to the defence of provocation being raised successfully, was manslaughter, which holds a reduced maximum sentence. This decision was highly controversial, and was criticized as having established a way for criminals to receive reduced sentences despite losing control and reacting to provocation in a way that a reasonable person, in modern society, would not have. This was allowed by the outdated definition of a reasonable person in the defence. The definition of a reasonable person in the defence allowed for the reactions of the husband to be explained, however the responses of the community to the ruling of the case demonstrated a …show more content…

By reforming the defence, it would allow for a common ground to be met between the opinions of the public and the needs of accused. As shown in the community survey, respondents all indicated a general opinion that despite whether the law of provocation should exist or not, it should not be applicable in the case of verbal provocation. By removing the use of the defence in cases where the accused has been verbally provoked, it would limit the ability of the accused to raise the defence to receive a reduced sentence for reacting to more minor provocation, preventing over reaction and loss of control when unnecessary. Removing the defence in cases of verbal provocation but leaving it in place for cases of physical provocation would suitably defend the rights of the accused, allowing them to react when possibly threatened or provoked to a point at which reaction to the provocation would be considered reasonable. This would be justifiable as physical provocation is more serious, and can often result in violence against the person being provoked, meaning it often requires a more serious reaction from the person being provoked, in order for it to end. As well as removing the defence of provocation in cases of verbal provocation, changing the definition of a reasonable person, and what would cause a reasonable person to respond

Show More
Related
673 Words | 3 Pages

This case also shows the effectiveness of the legal system in protecting individuals rights to not be tried or punished more than once under section 26. This is shown as the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions had urged that it would be oppressive as he already served 11 months of his sentence therefore the acquittal remained the

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

4. Analysis The outcome of the case does not seem logical to me personally. I am conflicted about the entire decision so instead I will state what I do believe was a poor decision on part of the Australian legal

Read More
1586 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction In the matter of R v Francis , the defendant (Glen Reginald Francis) was being tried for the attempted murder of Timothy Udris. On 8th June 2014, Glenn Francis (‘Francis’) attacked Timothy Udris (‘Udris’), who was hit at least two times with a claw hammer to the skull. The Crown submitted that Francis had attempted to murder Udris, under s306 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld).

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

To measure if justice was achieved, the case must be reviewed with the three main characteristics of justice, Was it fair? Was it equal? Did both parties have equal access? with further analysis of the back story, charges and both parties cases considered with the characteristics of Justice an educated decision can be made whether the case R v Loveridge [2013] NSWSC 1638, achieved Justice Kieran Loveridge was convicted by the courts for an unprovoked attack on 18- year old Thomas Kelly at Kings Cross and assaults on Rhyse Saliba, Aden Gazi, Marco Compagnoni and Matthew Serrao. Kieran Loveridge was also found as intoxicated through the process of the assaults although there is no legitimate proof on how much Kieran Loveridge consumed, but

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

The decision of the appellate court was based on factual guilt of the appellant, which overruled the concept of legal guilt used at his original sentencing. The decision of the Crown was based on the presumption of guilt based on the individual’s social behavior, which made his conviction highly unusual ("R. v. Lalumiere, 2011 ONCA 826 (CanLII)", 2011).

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Tara Brown’s murder, various groups of individuals are affected. As well as maintaining principles of fair punishment and deterrence, the criminal justice system has to consider perceptions of the victim’s family (secondary victim), the community’s demand for crime prevention, and the offender’s rights to a fair court hearing. The most likely outcome is imprisonment for Lionel John Patea due to committing an indictable offence. It is important to note that if this was only a case of domestic abuse without murder, it would utilise more time, effort and expenses to come to a resolution. This is due to the different circumstances and degree of abuse that the judge has to assess.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

And considering that judges rarely used the death penalty they knew that it holds serious weight will only ever be used under extreme circumstances where an extreme punishment is necessary. They also stated that if the prosecution finds “aggravating circumstance”(Coenen, 2004) to call for the death penalty some judges still may not use this punishment if “mitigating evidence”(Coenen, 2004) is found such as abuse as a child making it even harder for the death sentence to be used and therefore, only under specific circumstances will it ever be used. The dissenting opinion, however, held the view that the two main purposes of the death penalty, “general deterrence and retribution”(Gregg v. Georgia - Case Summary and Case Brief, 2017) and that both of the arguments were not strong at

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

When sentencing anyone, especially juveniles, for non-homicidal crimes, penological justification is needed. The four goals of penal sanctions - retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation - were not justified in this case. Graham was being sentenced to life even though he did not take another person’s life. He did not significantly alter his victim’s life in any way. Therefore, retribution is not proportionate.

Read More
1161 Words | 5 Pages

He suggests that other social policies also lead to the death of innocent individuals, but they are not banned. The author presents deductive arguments to support his position, including the idea that murderers who are not executed have the potential to harm more innocent people. He believes that opponents of capital punishment should acknowledge their responsibility for innocent lives lost due to murderers who were not executed. Prager concludes that capital punishment is necessary to protect innocent lives. Opponents should confront their responsibility for every innocent already murdered and yet to be murdered by murderers who should have been

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

A bifurcated trial system was set up which consists of two phases, for bifurcated means divided. It is decided separately if the person on trial is guilty and what the penalty placed on the individual is (Vile). Each phase is subject can be to appeal too. In the first phase or the guilt phase, both sides submit evidence and argue whether or not the individual is guilty or not. In Gregg’s case, he had signed a waiver admitting to the killings and it was evident that he was guilty(“Gregg v. Georgia (1976)”).

Read More
1363 Words | 6 Pages

Facts of the case: The defendant was charged with the use of threatening, abusive or insulting words or disorderly behavior within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress under section 5(1)(a) of the Public Order Act 1986. Secondly, the assault of Douglas Campbell Crossan under section 51(1) of the Police Act 1964. The initial offence includes that at 1:15am an argument between the defendant and his girlfriend erupted whilst they were standing 8-10 feet away from the nearest house.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 87(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1143970 This article was written by Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L. Akers. They both consulted experts on criminology and criminal behaviour to evaluate the effectiveness of the Death Penalty.

Read More
1213 Words | 5 Pages

Thus, the delinquent committing the act rationalizes that since there is no body of rules for either themselves or for their organizations then there is no criminal intent. They do not believe they have committed a delinquent act against the legal system even if they think what they did was wrong. The five techniques of neutralization therefore hit on the denial of responsibility, The denial of injury, the denial of the victim, the condemnation of the condemners and lastly the appeal to higher loyalties. (Sykes, et al,

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

That is no strange a notion to real, zealous advocates. Often times, there are cases during which the advocate has to push the witness or the prosecution extra hard to hear what he/ she wants to hear. Such was the case illustrated in the movie “A Few Good Men” where the young advocate Daniel Kaffee had US Marine Corps Colonel Jessup on the witness stand. The case was a sophisticated one in which the Colonel had ordered all the soldiers in the base not to touch their fellow underperforming comrade meanwhile individually ordering two other soldiers a “Code Red”, resulting in a murder.

Read More
1153 Words | 5 Pages

Bourhill v Young (1943) AC 92 is a Scottish delict case which emphasize on how extensive an individual duty to ensure others are not harmed by their actions or activities, this case has established on how the scope of recovery for bystanders or who are uninvolved with physical harm. This case centers around an incident where Mrs Bourhill claimed that she suffered shock due to the fact that Mr young had a collision with a car around 50 ft away from her while she was exiting a tram car. To be exact, this case took place on the 11 October 1938 where Mr Young was negligently riding his motorcycle along the road, and happen to have a collision with a car fatally injuring him, Mrs Bourhill was leaving a tram car while the collision took place.

Read More

More about Partial Legal Defense Of Provocation In Queensland's Criminal Justice System

Related Topics

Open Document