ipl-logo

Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God

542 Words3 Pages

ID: 000883370
537 Words
Pascal suggests that the faith in believing God is a "wager". For any person S, he or she has two choices can be made. One choice is α, the other is β, and if α is chosen to have a greater benefit for S, S should choose α. Taking into account the existence of God or not has half of the possibility, and believing God has greater benefit. Therefore, people should choose to believe in the existence of God.
What is the advantage of Pascal? That is, people believe God that can help them enter heaven. From the perspective of strategy, the benefits of going to heaven can be said to be infinite. The benefits of can not go to heaven should be zero. The opportunity of God can be infinitely small, but is multiplied by infinity, also derived infinity. The chance that God does not exist is greater, but equals to zero if multiplied by zero. Therefore, the choice of believing that God exists would win. And the contrary is that the choice of God does not exist. It is a choice that would lose.
For Pascal 's wager, most philosophers argue that it is the most perverse argument in discussing the faith of God 's existence. If you get a message outside of saying that your house is on fire, your children are still in the house. You are not sure if the news was accurate. What is a more rational decision for you? Of course, you will rush to go …show more content…

For the above objections, a proponent of Pascal 's Wager can refute in such way. For example, Pascal 's Wager is not a complete denial of evidence, but rather that it is not immoral to use practical reasoning without sufficient evidence. Pascal 's Wager has support of decision-making theory to a great extent. Anyway, according to Pascal 's Wager, betting on not believing God is impossible to win. There is a free invitation from God. Everyone has freewill that can accept or reject the invitation. Pascal 's Wager is precisely the choice that accepts or rejects the existence of God, and therefore there is no conflict at

Show More
Related

Chapter Summary: Mathematics Through The Eyes Of Faith

1351 Words | 6 Pages

Equally as important as the previous subject, Chance in chapter five, is particularly imperative because it mentions deep theological and philosophical cases such as: case for theistic determinism as well as a case for theistic nondeterminism. The authors evenly divide the explanation of both the theists and non-theists in separate pages to distinguish the differences between them, including some examples and figures. Based on the argument between the two cases, the determinist insists and argues that God is the highest power of this universe, and therefore excludes ontological doubt. In comparison, the non-determinist believes that God has created the physical universe with a freedom to choose and a life of its

Read More

Lara Buchak's Can It Be Rational To Have Faith

1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More

The Wager Rhetorical Analysis

739 Words | 3 Pages

He introduces the idea with a game, a simple wager of " heads or tails". However, in his game, one side of the coin represents the belief that God exist, while the other means that God does not exist. What we bet on in Pascal's Wager is also more than your ordinary school yard gamble with higher stake. In this wager, betting our entire lives, as well as the infinite beyond which we live on this

Read More

What Is The Tone Of Sam Harris Letter To A Christian Nation

1356 Words | 6 Pages

Despite that, I know that I’m taking the better “wager” by believing in God. I know this for the reasons stated previously, plus when compared to the alternative, it makes more sense. Who would want to burn forever? The benefits of one are superior to the other, and the consequences are far more severe than the other. This is what Pascal was referring to and I support that belief and ‘’’wager’’ as

Read More

Wager's Argument For The Existence Of God

378 Words | 2 Pages

The ontological argument states that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so the concept of God entails God’s existence. However, it can be argued that if God is an infinite goodness, then its contrary, evil, should not exist. Alas, there is evil in the world, and, therefore, God cannot exist. The ontological argument also seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of concept alone. Pascal’s Wager attempts to justify the belief in God with an

Read More

Pascal's Pensees Rhetorical Analysis

377 Words | 2 Pages

In Pascal’s Pensees, the difference between reason and believing are two completely different things. For Pascal, believing in God is good for the heart, but for all the non-believers, reason could be the only way to get closer to God. On other hand, there was a point where Pascal stated that there are somethings that reason does not understand the result, but the only thing that can understand the impossible is God. Thus, in Pascal tells his audience that the impossible reasoning is only understand by having God in their hearts.

Read More

Good And Evil In C. S. Lewis Mere Christianity

1015 Words | 5 Pages

In the rival conceptions of God, Lewis divides humanity into two main groups; those who believe in God or gods and those who do not. Those who believe in God, Lewis divides into two subgroups. The first, Pantheists view God as “beyond good and evil” (Lewis, 1980) as if God and the universe are one. The second, Christians view God as the absolute good Creator, separate from His creation.

Read More

Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis

619 Words | 3 Pages

Argument Against the Argument of Pascal’s Wager In Pascal’s Wager, Pascal pioneered new thoughts and opinions amongst his peers in probability theories by attempting to justify that believing in God is advantageous to one’s personal interest. In this paper, I will argue that Pascal’s argument rationalizing why one should believe in God fails and I will suggest that even if one was to accept Pascal’s wager theory, this will not be a suffice resolution to reap the rewards that God has promised to Christian believers like myself who has chosen to believe in God due to my early childhood teachings, familial and inherited beliefs. Pascal offers a logical reason for believing in God: just as the hypothesis that God's existence is improbable, the

Read More

Pascal's Wager Argument

416 Words | 2 Pages

Atheists and thesis have always butted heads with each other on believing if there truly is a God and if so, should you believe in Him? Atheists are people who do not believe in a God or all powerful and all knowing creature, whereas Theists are ones who chose to believe in a God. Choosing to believe in God, being the creator and someone who is all knowing and powerful being, comes with some benefits according to Pascal’s wager. The fundamental idea behind Pascal's Wager is a Pros and con's list as to why one should believe in God and it shows positives and the negatives of believing and not believing. Pascal's Wager by Blaise Pascal is a persuasive argument for whether God exists, but there are many faults with the argument because viewing

Read More

Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

933 Words | 4 Pages

The question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.

Read More

Annotated Bibliography

472 Words | 2 Pages

Web. 16 Dec. 2015. This article seeks to argue and find evidence that there is a God. Through the use of social science and research, this article focuses on establishing the validity and reliability of evidence in social research and concludes that the case study approach is valid for providing empirical scientific evidence for the existence of God.

Read More

JL Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of God?

295 Words | 2 Pages

In his essay "The Will to Believe" William James tells us that his purpose is to present "a justification of faith, a defense of our right to adopt a believing attitude in religious matters, in spite of the fact that our merely logical intellect may not have been coerced." Page2. I found his arguments also persuasive because he suggests the existence of God cannot be solve by our intellectual means. James argues that intellectual activity is motivated by two goals: to shun error and believe truth. The choice to believe or not is alive, forced and momentous.

Read More

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis

2349 Words | 10 Pages

Craig ends on the note that we cannot possibly surmise that God’s overall plan does not work to contribute to the salvation of the greatest number of people (p.

Read More

Thomas Aquinas First Cause Argument Analysis

1797 Words | 8 Pages

Since premise two has been rebuffed by me, it renders premise 3 unsound which in turn renders premise four unsound thereby proving that God does not exist and proving that the first cause argument does not validate or prove the existence of God. The first cause argument while it is a very important argument still lacks credibility and is self-defeating as it is riddled with a lot of problems that makes it hard to reach a true and sound

Read More

Existence Of God Analysis

1027 Words | 5 Pages

In this argument we already assumed that there may be possibility that God exist and finally we reached where we started. So this argument does not give us the exact information about existence of God. There are many objections on this argument but still it is a powerful argument. In my opinion, this argument is not much satisfactory. It describes that existence is greater than imagination.

Read More

More about Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document