ipl-logo

Blaise Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God

747 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Pascal --the necessity of the wager

Blackburn claims that Pascals argument is set-up in a way that presumes something about god, but Blackburn does not consider the fact that Pascal sets his argument up on faith and belief, not presumption.

Pascals Wager, an argument not about the whether the existence of God is valid, but rather the rationality of it. Blaise Pascal, compares the belief in God to the metaphorical equivalent of a gamble, or a wager. Arguing that God poses an infinite power, Pascal describes how "He is infinitely incomprehensible"(Pascal's 4) mentioning how "He has no Affinity to us". (Pascal's 4). Concluding that we cannot come up with a conclusion for god's existence, he argues instead we should utilize the possibility of reward , or impede possible punishments …show more content…

Because Pascal initially concludes God to be "infinitely incomprehensible"(Pascal's 4), putting us in a "position of metaphysical ignorance." (Blackburn's 20) we are unable to understand anything of God, yet Pascal assumes that we can create assumptions about rewards and punishments associated with such a being. Pascal also says that the belief in God can only have two answers. Blackburn takes this as a case of false options saying that the belief in God has more than two answers. As humans, are unable to understand an incomprehensible and powerful being, especially because "He has no affinity to us"(Pascal's 4), so Blackburn questions the premise of Pascal's argument, where it seems as if his set up assumes something about God. Blackburn's most important point raised is the case of false options, referring to the outcomes presented in Pascal's …show more content…

What Blackburn fails to see about the setup of Pascal's argument is that his "presumptions" are in fact not presumptions, but rather belief in his religion; Christianity. Christianity believes that the bible is the word of God, and as a result, Pascal does not assume how God would act, but rather believes that God instructs Pascal on how he will act (because the bible is the word of God). This refutes Blackburn's statement, saying that Pascal assumes something about God, when in fact Pascal just believes it is what God has told him. As for the case of false options, Blackburn argues that we do not have to choose, and there are more than two options to choose from. This is true and is a fallacy of Pascal, as he does not explain in his argument that God will punish those who do not believe in him, as well as those who do not believe in him. Again this is interpreted through the "word of God". Blackburn turns back to his initial statement and main premise, that Pascal's setup assumes something about God, when he is actually not. As a result, Blackburn's initial premises are false, refuting his conclusion that Pascal assumes something about the "infinitely incomprehensible"

Show More
Related
458 Words | 2 Pages

The second reason is that he doesn’t want to suggest that the idea of a positive god can be

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

He introduces the idea with a game, a simple wager of " heads or tails". However, in his game, one side of the coin represents the belief that God exist, while the other means that God does not exist. What we bet on in Pascal's Wager is also more than your ordinary school yard gamble with higher stake. In this wager, betting our entire lives, as well as the infinite beyond which we live on this

Read More
237 Words | 1 Pages

Athena the Brains is written by Joan Holub & Suzanne Williams, Athena is expected to Mount Olympus Academy and is ready to face anything and everything that comes her way. Athena is a normal girl from Earth until she got a letter from Zeus. On the letter it said that she was accepted into Mount Olympus Academy ,also the letter says that she is a goddess and the daughter of Zeus her dad. When Athena got there, she looks around at the massive building with a lot of fountains, flowers, and more marvelous items, afterwards walks into the office and sign up for every single class that was on the list. Then went to all the classes she signed up for, afterwards that night she went to her new room, she meets her roommate and the people around her.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

The ontological argument states that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so the concept of God entails God’s existence. However, it can be argued that if God is an infinite goodness, then its contrary, evil, should not exist. Alas, there is evil in the world, and, therefore, God cannot exist. The ontological argument also seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of concept alone. Pascal’s Wager attempts to justify the belief in God with an

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Argument Against the Argument of Pascal’s Wager In Pascal’s Wager, Pascal pioneered new thoughts and opinions amongst his peers in probability theories by attempting to justify that believing in God is advantageous to one’s personal interest. In this paper, I will argue that Pascal’s argument rationalizing why one should believe in God fails and I will suggest that even if one was to accept Pascal’s wager theory, this will not be a suffice resolution to reap the rewards that God has promised to Christian believers like myself who has chosen to believe in God due to my early childhood teachings, familial and inherited beliefs. Pascal offers a logical reason for believing in God: just as the hypothesis that God's existence is improbable, the

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Philosophers are on a constant struggle to determine if free-will is real or an illusion. Joshua Knobe believes we will do a better job addressing philosophical questions if we “can arrive at a better understanding of the way our own minds work” and free-will is a very important part of our brain, if it were to exist (Experiments in Philosophy, Pg.3). Some philosophers may argue that if free will is an illusion “you couldn’t come up with a philosophical stance on […] new information and act on it, because that implies choice and choice is a product of free will” (If scientists unequivocally proved free will was an illusion, how would society change, if at all?, Pg. 1). So to my wonder, would there be philosophical thinking without free will?

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

Do you agree or disagree with the authors? Why or Why not? I would have to agree with the authors solely base on my interpretation of the question asked. Wilson and Hoffman’s statement is about reconciliation and restitution of a committed sin. It’s not about an ought against someone, it about confessing a sin that you have committed and repent for that sin.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

The question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

In this reading reflection I will be discussing Richard Swinburne’s argument on “Why God Allows Evil” which starts on page 254 in “Exploring Philosophy: An Anthology” by Steven M. Cahn. This was also discussed in class on 9/15/16. In his argument Swinburne states that “An omnipotent God could have prevented this evil, and surely a perfectly good and omnipotent God would have done so. So why is there evil?”(Swinburne, 254).

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

The biggest theme of The Great Divorce is salvation; more specifically, ensuring one’s immortal soul reaches Heaven and not Hell through the exercising correct moral choices in life and the practice of forgiving others and seeking forgiveness for your own sins. For Lewis, Heaven and Hell are not metaphoric or ideas, they are real places. In the book, Lewis develops this by having other related themes that affect salvation like, vanity vs. pride, love, the value of ideologies, faith vs. skepticism, jealousy, anger, and forgiveness.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

JL Mackie was persuasive in his argument by showing that belief in an almighty God is not rational. He proves this by posing the problem of evil. According to JL Mackie, if God exists and is omniscient, omnipotent, and good then evil would not exist. However, evil exists in this world, sometimes in the form of undeserved suffering (diseases that affect humans, earthquakes, famines ...) and others perpetrated by man (murders, wars ...). If God exists and has the capability to be powerful, good, omniscient and omnipotent, why would he let evil be perpetrated?

Read More
2349 Words | 10 Pages

He also refers to the cosmological argument to show that God is an all-powerful being who created the universe out of nothing. Furthermore, he claims that suffering in the world is moral in the sense that suffering inflicted on innocents is genuinely evil. Without a God, there would be no objective morals, thus, evil proves God’s existence, as things would not be considered good or evil without a God (Craig, p. 126). In conclusion, evil proves God’s existence and thus the question as to why God permits evil does not work to disprove His existence.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

Philosopher William Rowe agrees with Plantinga that propositions — that evil exists, God is omnipotent, and God is wholly good — is not logically inconsistent. Rowe does not believe it is impossible to allow God and his properties to exist along with evil. He takes a different route by focusing more on certain kinds of evil which evidently exist in the world, and not so much on the inconsistencies of the theist doctrines. This certain evil, in Rowe’s point of view, will show that a God who is all powerful and wholly good does not exist after all.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

In Christian tradition, the existence of God is central to the religion and the practices and beliefs associated with it. In this tradition, God can be conceived of as an all powerful, immortal and transcendent being who governs and creates the world as it is known. During the Medieval Era Christianity dominated Europe, leading to an extensive amount of philosophical and scholarly works related to God and how to properly conceive of him. As a result, many philosophical topics and theories were brought under examination in an attempt to combine them with Christian ideologies and conceptions of God and the world. One of the many topics brought under consideration was free will.

Read More

More about Blaise Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document