Comparing Power In Patapsco And The Css Tennessee

636 Words3 Pages

istory should stay as how it is and that all the symbols that are in place right now should stay where they are and no one should have the right to take them down or destroy them.People want to take down the statue of Robert E Lee, Also in world war on the ship that had a lot of power would be the uss patapsco because on the top of the iron ship it had a turret that could turn 360 degrees unlike the css Tennessee that had its weapons on the side. Robert e Lee and the ship both had power in the civil war.The use of power in “More than stones and symbols” and the fact of the uss Patapsco and the css tennessee is evident; however , the historical perspectives of each creator contrasting idea related to people believing and speaking out about whether we should keep the symbols of history and learn from them.These two sources show that we should learn from our history. The symbols that people want to take down shows who had the power and what they have done and why it is so important.An example would be that Robert E Lee was a general that had made a large impact on all of us. That 's why we should keep them then tear them down, That way we can learn about what that person has done.A reason why people want to take them down would be because they feel offended about that statue. …show more content…

This machine had amazing power because of its weaponry and the material it was made out of. The material it was made out of was pure metal, this was a good idea because it would last longer in fights. It would last longer because wooden boats would just get ripped to shreds and metal boats would take longer to break through. Another thing that made it overwhelmed with power would be the turret it had. The turret would be able to move 360 degrees to its target. This was a huge advantage because the ship would be able to ship to the front, sides, and