ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On 3 Strike Law

493 Words2 Pages

The 3 Strike Law is a law that applies to offender that have a history of being convicted of two or more violent crimes, and have moved on to committing another serious offense. Consequently, their prison sentence is increased in comparison to their previous sentences resulting in receiving a punishment to life in prison at their third offense. However, in 1994 the state of California enacted the law were criminals could be incarcerated when committing a non-violent crime for the third time, as long as they had a history of ever committing a serious or violent felony, the 3 Strike Law will still apply to them.

The 3 strike Law is beneficial to society by removing the criminals off the street and preventing them from ever putting people at risk of being victimized by them again. Criminals are not allows willing to change and most of them always end up going back to their same routines and crimes over and over again. By placing those criminals in jail, it lets society put a stop to ever …show more content…

I truly believe that if someone is punished by having to spend the rest of their natural life in prison it should at least be for committing a serious crime. For those who have committed a non-violent or serious crime as their third offense and receives the same punishment, that can be seen as cruel. Not saying that offenders should not be punished but instead it would be best to find a better suited punishment for their crime. For example, one of the prisoners in the video was sentenced to life in prison for stealing a pair of socks, and other did not even have a history of ever committing a serious or violent offense. Aside from it seeming unfair, Michael Romano from the video also made a good point by mentioning that the 3 Strike Law is becoming “costly”. By locking up more and more offenders for a third non-violent crimes results in the prison having to spend more money in order to house all of the

Show More
Related

  • California's Three Strikes Law Analysis

    385 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the spring of 1994, California’s Three Strikes was signed into law. It passed with the support of 72 percent of the state’s voters. (Gladwell 236) This law became highly controversial, and on November 6, 2012, voters passed Proposition 36, which amended the law with two primary provisions. Through the controversy, we must take a minute to remember how this law came to be. Mike Reynolds lost his daughter in June of 1992 to murder.

    Read More

  • Three Strikes Law Research Paper

    863 Words  | 4 Pages

    California’s Three Strikes Law was implemented in order to improve public safety. The murders of Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds caused the citizens of California to request a reactive measure in order to improve California’s preventive safety measures. Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds were both murdered by repeat offenders. The murders resulted in a public outcry and a petition was started in order to improve the sentencing requirements for repeat offenders (Skelton, 1993). The Three Strikes Law became a source of controversy due to the fact that many people argued that the law was in violation of the Eighth Amendment, which states that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments

    Read More

  • California Three Strikes Analysis

    78 Words  | 1 Pages

    Under the law of three strikes, which was implemented in some states of United States, a convict was awarded minimum 25 years to life if he was three time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions. California was the first state to implements this law where several high profile murders committed by felons. Residents were worried that these serial criminal would be released from the prison only to commit new, often serious and violent

    Read More

  • Three Strike Law Pros And Cons

    654 Words  | 3 Pages

    The three strike law aimed to convict career offenders by giving them a harsher verdict when the offender has been convicted of their third offenses. The goal of this law was to control career offenders by making them think twice about committing crimes because of the harsh punishment they would face if they were caught committing the third crime. Ever since the law has been passed it has been in the center of many controversies. Many argue that the law is unfair to the offenders and that it has a negative effect on society.

    Read More

  • Three-Strike Policy Pros And Cons

    458 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to our textbook, the three-strike policy is defined as “when people commit a third felony (a third “strike”), they are sentenced to life in prison” (280). The three-strike policy is only one example of how the legislators have tried to pass several laws which is basically meant to send more individuals to prison for longer sentences. The three-strike policy was passed and was put into effect. Many individuals believe that the three-strike policy is unethical and just plain cruel, while other individuals believe that the three-strike policy is a wonderful idea and that it would work out great.

    Read More

  • Three Strike Laws

    1249 Words  | 5 Pages

    There have been a few benefits and positive outcomes for implementing the three strikes law. These benefits include, but are not limited to: 1) justice being served for the victims of the crimes and it also removes the criminals not only from the streets, but from the community as well, 2) criminals are deterred because once they have three strikes, they have no more chances, and 3) criminals would retire, flee the state, and even change their whole behavior and ways of thinking (Harris, n.d.). Research has found that before there was a “three strikes law” there were set recommendations for the third time offender. For example, child molestation in the first degree that also had two prior sex offense would receive approximately nine years and six months for their sentence. Another example is

    Read More

  • The Three Strikes Law

    329 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States, habitual offender laws, are statutes enacted by state governments which mandates the courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses. What this means is that people that have been put in prison 3 times will get a harsher punishment going from whatever they 're consequence is to life in prison. I am against this law, for reasons I will talk about later. The origin of the three strikes law came from article 2 section 28 of the Montana constitution in 1998, which states the three strikes law.

    Read More

  • Three Strikes Law

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    The three strikes law refers to a “category of statutes” that substantially increases the length of imprisonment for anyone found guilty of three or more felony offenses (Legal). A strike is incurred each time an individual is convicted of a serious, or violent felony. The felonies that are included within this category are: “burglary, robbery, kidnapping, murder, rape, child molestation involving the use of a weapon, any offense that results in severe bodily injury, arson, and crimes that involve explosive materials.” (Randolph). Baumes law, was the precursor to the three strikes law that are in place today.

    Read More

  • What Are The Three Groups Associated With Penal Reform

    2285 Words  | 10 Pages

    They are in response to the problems of society and also because of the development on criminal justice reform. They also do this because they are trying to reduce recidivism and supply training that will then lead to reintegration. One reason why they did this is because they want to stop recidivism and make sure that those who were accused of a crime or even convicted want them to be prosecuted be punished and reformed. In today's society it is rare to find a prison that does not have a rehabilitative focus.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Prison Reform

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    There’s a multitude of things that need to be repaired in our system, and prison is one of them. Prison reform is an important issue because we need to take care of everyone and with the way we treat criminals, we do not see them as equal. We need to assess illegal acts correctly instead of trying to put people in jail for the rest of their lives. We also need to work more on how we try to rehabilitate people. Instead of barring convicts off from the rest of us, we need to teach them how to integrate, so they can live better lives than they did

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Three Strikes Law

    504 Words  | 3 Pages

    On March 7, 1994, the governor of California signed into law the "Three Strikes" legislation (Harris & Jesilow, 2000, P185). The law was originally set in place to hold those who committed serious felony offenses accountable for their second and third convictions, and intended to send a “…message to those who would prey on the innocent” (Harris & Jesilow, 2000, P185). The second offense would include penalty twice the prison term and a third would result in a sentence three times the normal stint given or a term of twenty-five years to life, whichever is greater. The “Three Strikes” law significantly disrupted the efficiency of the court system by increased trials and greater workloads and made predictions of case outcomes difficult. The “Three Strikes” law not only cause and influx of work and jail population but was also ineffective in “punishing” those who were committing the crimes, eventually leading to a revision of the law in 2012.

    Read More

  • Indeterminate Sentencing Vs Incarceration

    166 Words  | 1 Pages

    The maximum length is set by legislators and the judge imposes the length of the sentence up to the maximum. Mandatory sentences are set by legislators instead of judges. Mandatory sentences set a penalty for certain crimes that is the standard for all offenders convicted of that crime. I do not believe three-strike laws should be implemented across

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Recidivism

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    In other words, mandatory sentencing for repeating offenders that have not learned their lesson and also so they stop committing crimes in the street since they are imprisoned. What the law basically states is that if you are a felon that has two felonies in their record and gets charged with a third felony, you must received the maximum sentence for the type of felony. With this law follows a lot of controversy. Some people believe that it is too harsh and can ruin a person's life. Others believe it is well deserved as you get 3 chances to better yourself.

    Read More

  • Essay On Three Strikes Laws

    526 Words  | 3 Pages

    Three strikes laws are state laws that accommodate a much harsher discipline, for the most part a lifelong incarceration, the third time a man submits a lawful offense. There are likewise periodic guilty party laws, which are recognized by the quantity of offenses expected to trigger the harsher punishment. For instance, in North Carolina, a man is viewed as an ongoing guilty party on their fourth crime. Three strikes and ongoing wrongdoer laws shift enormously from state to state and their application can turn on elements, for example, • The time allotment between crimes • The reality of the crimes • The request of the wrongdoings submitted • Discretion of the trial judge in sentencing under the law

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay Pro Death Penalty

    1476 Words  | 6 Pages

    It is inconsistent, immoral, futile, and more costly compared to other major felony sentences. It’s time to question the process of the “ultimate” criminal punishment in the United States, and more importantly, its effects. It’s possible that the saying, “an eye for an eye,” is a common belief among the American people.

    Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On 3 Strike Law

Open Document