Persuasive Essay On Banning Books In Libraries And Schools

Fire and Ink Knowledge is power, but today we take it for granted. And the government is taking that right away. The right to freedom of speech. The government is taking stories, opinions, and history out of the libraries. The government is taking away books that have to deal with opposing opinions, history, and race. Some things are hard to read about, but if the Government takes it away, people can’t learn how to be understanding or not make the same mistakes in history all over again. It’s also taking away freedom to say what we want. In the Egyptian BC era, books were burned by the government to control their people. Books are prized possessions. They were so scared, the Egyptians made underground libraries to keep their precious books

Books are being banned in libraries and schools, which is limiting freedom of speech. Most people ask to ban books to protect their kids in high school, but high school students are old enough to understand and make their own decisions about what they read, according to the First Amendment. For adolescents, it’s different, some books are not meant for them, but for High School students that are 15 and up, they should read what they want. The government banned books that they deemed offensive, but authors have the right to tell a story the way they want. People have the right to read a story and decide for themselves if they find it offensive or not, and move on. Book banning limits the freedom of speech because “Censors ban books to prevent the dissemination of thoughts and ideas they deem dangerous or due to moral, religious, or political objections” (Book Banning”). While some books might be offensive, people have the right to say what they want and talk to people about it, but they don’t have the right to control what other people think about the book. People have the right to make their own opinions about what they read. Reading can change opinions or help people relate to what they already

If a teen is going through puberty, and trying to find books on the topic, but the liberty deemed it ‘inappropriate’, so the teen has no information on how to take care of themselves, and because they said it’s inappropriate, they might feel guilty and gross about themselves. But if the library did have those books about puberty, the teen would know how to handle it and know that it’s normal. Books shouldn't be banned because of their content. If it makes people mad, or disgusted, that's fine, but don’t take it away from people who need to learn from that book. It’s a childish way of dealing with something, and is limiting everyone’s freedom. And if it does make people mad, the first amendment is there for people to converse about the similar topic and help them though it. Sometimes history is depressing, but if people start banning books about history we could repeat history’s past mistakes, like World War I, or the Chernobyl disaster or