Firearms is one of America’s most controversial topics, one side argues that guns should be outlawed and only permitted to those in association with the government, while the other side replies that guns should be buyable to law abiding citizens and should not be outlawed. I myself fall on the side that claims why guns should not be outlawed, and why we should be able to possess firearms if we do our duties as a citizen. In the constitution under amendment II, it states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, what this means is that no one should be able to take away our rights to keep and use firearms. But there are still people who think that guns are too dangerous and lead to an excessive amount of casualties, and instead would like to keep guns off the streets.. To that I respond with the phrase that guns don 't kill …show more content…
Before being able to sell and deal firearms you must go through a process where you have a background check. If you pass all the requirements then you are rewarded a license that permits you to sell firearms. They have also made laws that prohibit people with a criminal background or a convicted felon from buying weapons and firearms, for they could cause harm and terror to society. Though this does not prevent all illegal gun deals it does keep the number low, and also helps the government monitor gun owners and such more easily. hopefully I was able to convince most of you who read this, and persuaded you to see why guns should be legal, and how citizens should be able to use them for various reasons. To those I did not change your vantage point, I encourage you to do some unbiased research and see for yourself. To those who will not take these actions I give you my deepest regards, and hopefully you are able to see my reasoning one