ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Justice For Juveniles

569 Words3 Pages

Justice for Juveniles The supreme court ruled that juveniles who committed murders could not be sentenced to life in prison on June 25,2012. This ruling was because of the injustices of breaking the eighth amendment. The position of abolishing this sentencing is the best choice certainly because of the age of the people doing the crimes. Any one who does a crime should be punished, but at an age where you're still growing and developing you should be given a chance to rehabilitate yourself later in your life. Adolescents are being sentenced as adults all over the United States, but don’t get treated as an adult on normal occasions. It’s not fair to give guidelines and rules for kids to follow that separate them from adults, but as soon as they slip up that separation no longer exists. With this type of thinking it proves the counterargument that there shouldn’t be a separation …show more content…

In Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences Garinger says “Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the Adolescent brain responsible for controlling thoughts, actions,and emotions aren't fully developed.” This proves that even though them committing crimes is wrong it needs to be taken in consideration that they are still developing basic concepts. Not all teens commit violent crimes with this instability in the brain, but everyone is different and has different upbringings, surroundings, and influences while growing up. Your environment and the people you surround yourself with influences the decisions you make in your life some good and others bad. In Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences it also mentions that the supreme court realized “ juvenile offenders cannot with reliability be classified amongst the worst offenders”. If this is the realization of teen killers then why should they be getting the same punishment as an adult if they have different

Show More
Related

Summary Of On Punishment And Teen Killers By Jennifer Jenkins

257 Words | 2 Pages

In the article “ On punishment and teen killers” by Jennifer Jenkins argues that 1,300 cases nationally of a teen killer sentenced as an adult to life, sometimes called JLWOP. Jenkins supports her argument by first explain the cases for example, when a teenager murdered her and her husband in 1990 in Chicago. When i read this paragraph i was sad because why would you want to kill your own husband like what is the reason why she did that. I think it was because the husband did something bad like cheating on his wife or because she went crazy like her mind was telling her to kill him. This is another example a high school teacher said that it's hard to think that a young teen could do a bad crime and without parole.

Read More

Gail Garinger's 'Juveniles Don' T Deserve Life Sentences?

945 Words | 4 Pages

In Gail Garinger’s, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences,” she argues that juveniles have great potential in being able to change their lives for the better. Garinger starts off with the superpredator theory which involves kids who will commit crimes in groups, and in response, laws were made to easily try kids as adults in court. Even with the superpredator prediction never coming true, the laws that were made still exist. Garinger then moves on to describing how teens are different than adults in many different aspects. Garinger states, “As a former juvenile court judge, I have seen first hand the enormous capacity of children to change and turn themselves around” (Garinger par.

Read More

Nathan Ybanez Case

1069 Words | 5 Pages

The unfaltering dissension about sentencing juveniles to life in prison without parole has yielded opposition in the criminal justice system and dysfunction towards the young lives facing unsettled, extreme punishment for their mitigating crimes. While this particular topic can branch to very detailed discussions in divergent aspects such as: socially, politically, scientifically, and morally, it should be eliminated to only two characteristics: is it fair and is it right? Although it seems painless and facile to act on impulse when punishing juvenile criminals severely, the consequences are ineffective and adverse to the needs of the victims, the development of adolescent offenders, and the primary function of the criminal justice system.

Read More

Life Sentences: Illegal Or Inhumane?

128 Words | 1 Pages

For the past years there has been a debate on whether juveniles should be tried as life without parole or life with parole. In my opinion juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence to life without parole. Although the juveniles are underage they are well informed of what’s right and what’s wrong, but some of them have difficulty understanding of what they are doing at the moment of the crime because they are angry and act before thinking clearly. I agree with the majority of supreme court justices who believe that mandatory life sentences are unconstitutional, unfair and inhumane because juveniles are immature, their brain is not completely developed, and they are unaware of long term impact

Read More

Ethos In Juvenile Crimes

679 Words | 3 Pages

This puts it into the reader’s minds that these juveniles are indeed not yet adults, and therefore should not be tried as such. Lundstrom also uses statistics that prove that juvenile crime is down, that “the nation’s juvenile arrest for murder fell 68 percent from 1993 to 1999, hitting its lowest level since 1966, according to the Justice Department. The juvenile arrest rate for violent crime overall fell 36 percent from 1994 to 1999.”(19) The reason why she adds this is because, in a previous paragraph, Dan Macallair from the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco stated that “We’ve created this image tht teenagerrs are something to be feared,”(16) proving that the crime rate for these teens have dropped dramatically, showing that adolescents are not as violent as they once were.

Read More

Do Juveniles Deserve Life Sentences

842 Words | 4 Pages

In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” published by the Juvenile Justice Information Exchange on Aug 2,2011 the author, Jennifer Jenkins, points out how teen killers should be tried as adults for crimes committed at an adult level. Jenkins states that “... I understand how hard it is to accept the reality that a 16 or 17 year old is capable of forming such requisite criminal intent.” If a the teen intended to kill someone then they should be locked up, but if that was not the intention then they should get the help necessary instead of being locked

Read More

Essay On Juveniles Deserve Life Sentences

582 Words | 3 Pages

In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that it is immoral to give juveniles life sentences, even if they commit a crime as serious as murder, because it is a cruel and unusual punishment. This has been an issue in America as teenagers are often treated as adults in court due to a belief that their crimes warrant a harsh punishment. Many believe that these kids should not be given such major sentences because they are still immature and do not have the self control that adults do. I agree that juveniles do not deserve life sentences because they put less thought and planning into these crimes and they often are less malicious than adults. The article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that the teenagers lose brain tissue that is responsible for self control and impulses (Thompson 7).

Read More

Juvenile Justice Elena Kagan Case Analysis

1315 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court of the United States of America in 2012 ruled that juveniles couldn’t be tried as juveniles and be sentenced to life without the possibility of bail, no matter how harsh the nature of the crime committed. Justice Elena Kagan argues that juveniles who commit crimes typically have a rough upbringing or unfortunate circumstances which cannot be controlled by the juvenile. She argues that if they are serving a life in prison without a chance of parole, it causes damage to them psychologically due to the lack of experiences. They will miss the most important moments in life that define who they are as an individual.

Read More

Life Without Parole

888 Words | 4 Pages

Adolescents lack the ability to make good decisions, be more organized, and the ability for good planning. Juveniles should therefor not be treated as adults when sentenced to life without the possibility of

Read More

Juvenile Justice System Pros And Cons

315 Words | 2 Pages

In the juvenile justice system juveniles, should be convicted as adults for major crimes caused by adolescents. in the terms of the different crimes there is a different punishment but not for murder is seams that some get one harsh punishment than the other. There are two ways to go as if you look at the pros and cons on a good route or a bad route, as the good one leads you to good things in life and the other bad things happen, therefore going to the good route is the best way to go but this not the case with our juveniles. They may start good but something may happen during that route that they get side tracked and start doing crimes. Juveniles already know what is right and wrong.

Read More

Juvenile Justice Case

698 Words | 3 Pages

Juvenile Justice Justice Elena Kagan spoke for the majority of the supreme court, “Mandatory life without parole for a juvenile precludes consideration of his chronological age and its hallmark features—among them, immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences.” This was the ruling of the Supreme Court case on June 25, 2012. Juveniles are no longer allowed to be sentenced a life sentence without parole. The majority is correct, the underdeveloped, adolescent mind is still growing and cannot be compared to an adult’s. A major influence during childhood is the media.

Read More

Essay On Why Juveniles Should Be Tried As Adults

1392 Words | 6 Pages

When people commit crimes, there should be disciplined no matter what. Juveniles need to learn that their behaviors have consequences. Why should kids be given any less of a punishment for committing the same crime? According to one author, “Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate. After all, the victim’s life will never be returned, and the family will permanently lose their loved one” (“7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults”).

Read More

Children Should Be Tried As Adults Essay

1042 Words | 5 Pages

There has been a really big controversy on whether teens who have committed crimes, such as murderer, should be convicted and sentenced as an adult. Studies have shown that an estimate of 200,000 children in America are charged and put into prison and prosecuted as adults. People believe that except for extraordinary circumstances should children younger than 17 should be put into adult prisons for a great period of time. Teenagers are being tried as adults and sentenced to prison at alarming rates in the United States. These “children” are below the age of 17 meaning they are committing these crimes without actually meaning to cause as much damage like taking someone’s life therefore, I strongly believe that children and teenagers under the

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Juvenile Justice

729 Words | 3 Pages

Juveniles Justice Juveniles who are criminals being sentenced to life without parole can be shocking to some people. I believe if a juvenile is able to commit a crime, then they are able to do the time. The article “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” talks about how the brain can be different from the time you are teens to the time you are an adult. After, considering both sides on juvenile justice it is clear that juveniles should face life without parole because they did the crime so they can do the time. Also I believe the juvenile’s age should not influence the sentence and the punishment give.

Read More

Why Should Juvenile Be Treated As Adults

964 Words | 4 Pages

Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Justice For Juveniles

Related Topics

Open Document