ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Monkey Love

1094 Words5 Pages

Monkey Love Here is the situation. You have to choose a cure for your own child's illness or the life of an animal. What are your thoughts right now? The cure or the animal? That cure you need for your child's’ illness was tested on animals in a biomedical research experiment. Hearing that might change someone's mind because some people don't believe that animal testing is right. Others would choose the cure for their child and forget about the animal. There are a lot of opinions when it comes to the topic of using animals in biomedical research. I, however, agree with the process of biomedical animal research because it is more beneficial for us humans to know as much as possible about our medical products before putting them out for the public.Also, animals are very similar to humans, and using them as a resource in the medical world will help us cure diseases and illnesses we never before thought possible. Animals themselves are very similar to humans both physically and mentally. With them being …show more content…

Is doing this ethically alright? The question that the naysayers need to remember is, who would you put in the animal's place? If your loved one has a disease would you let them test a new possible cure, with no background knowledge of the effects it may have? No, most people would not be happy putting their loved one in that position. Slater herself writes, “Of course I’d choose Clara.” (153.), when asked to choose between a cure for her ill daughter or the life of an animal. Even though Slater is not a fan of animal testing she understands that it is a necessity to the modern world. No one wants to see their loved ones lose their lives, when animal research could have helped prevented a cure going wrong. This is arguably the most difficult and controversial part of biomedical animal testing, the morals. Yes, it is a hard decision, but one that reeks more positives than

Show More
Related
696 Words | 3 Pages

After the Revolution, the immediate crisis was a national government. Congress felt the need of a powerful central government was crucial to their survival from Great Britain. Even though the war was over, the settlers felt as if they might always have a need to be stronger than their former foes. In my opinion, they probably thought that the bad blood between them and Britain would always pose a threat to their new found freedom and independence. Because of this, their next step was a big and strategic one.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Also in this article a lot is being discussed about if the actual human needs are actually being met even after running so many harmful experiments on animals in the end is it all worth it, and we actually getting the answers and information that we need from these animals being experimented on. In conclusion I personally do not agree with animal research, to me it does not seem ethical to sacrifice animals in order to satisfy human beings. I feel as though if we as humans have rights and laws to protect us then animals should too, they feel pain and suffer just as we do. When you apply ethics to something, you think about the moral aspect of it all

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

The ethics revolving around animal rights and animal testing are highly controversial. A large scale of people in the United States say that animals deserve some protection from misuse, while other Americans argue animals are worthy of the same rights as humans. However, a quarter of Americans object banning medical research, which results from animal testing. A clear majority of people if they were tied up or injected with substances into the bloodstream or inhalation and force-feeding would lean towards declining the studies. As for animals, we are their voice and give them no option but to be tested on and when finished it either results in death or sold to another laboratory.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

As technology increases and advances, medical science advances as well. With every new finding, progress is being made and life improved. While new technologies have aided in advancement greatly, there is one form of discovery and testing that has time and time again been proven to be effective: animal testing. Using animals for medical research has been extremely controversial, and some groups are protesting in order to outlaw this method of gathering beneficial information. What these protesters may not realize, though, is that the use of animals in medical and scientific experiments has saved a multitude of lives over the decades and has improved our everyday health.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

68% of people oppose animal testing, but do you know how animal testing really works or its benefits? There is much controversy on animal testing all though some think it is inhumane, Animal testing is one of the best things for mankind. Animals can show us medical findings and medications, to save human lives and to advance human knowledge. Animals can help us in many ways,we need this in order to build better medications and medical assistance. There are huge benefits towards using animals for medical research.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Since the emergence of bio medicine, animal testing has been a focal point of controversy. Those opposed to the use of animals in scientific studies believe that it is important for humans to treat all living things with the same respect. Animal rights activists make the argument that we should not do anything to a piglet for example, that we would not want done to our own infants. In spite of these points, animal testing is a crucial part of advancing biology, medicine and the overall welfare of human life. It is justified for scientists to have a more invasive form of research ethics towards animals as opposed to humans as the benefits far outweigh the consequences.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

What would you do if you were dragged out of your home and brought to a facility to be tested on knowing you would suffer? Well, many animals have to live through this and they can’t protest against it. Good morning/afternoon class and Mr. Fox, today I will be discussing the issue of animal testing. This approach to research has proven ineffective, inhumane, misleading expensive and even dangerous to people. Animal tests are misleading a large number of researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments due to the results of Animal testing.

Read More
1475 Words | 6 Pages

Animal testing is a extremely controversial topic due to the fact that it deals with many issues such as morality. Animal testing is aimed to help the advancement of wellness and health of people but at the same time harms other creatures. People who are in favor of animal experimenting usually support the scientific research and medical progress part of the issue, while others find it to be inhumane. But, in this debate there are also people who fall in the middle. They care about animals and don’t like the part of hurting them, but know that due to this type of testing there have been and continue to be many important advancements for the human race.

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

Still many hold beliefs that fall either in the middle of these two opposing views or completely outside of them. In the article “Animal Research Saves Human Lives,” Heloisa Sabin uses the polio vaccine as an example of how animal testing is beneficiary to humans. She uses the suffering that patients faced as a strong example of why animal testing is necessary. In the article “Why We Don’t Need Animal Experimentation,” Peggy Carlson responds to Sabin’s claim by explaining how unbeneficial animal testing

Read More
2052 Words | 9 Pages

Animal experimentation has been an easy and ethically acceptable way to research and test medicines and treatments for humans since the time of the ancient Greeks. Animals opened the door for the scientists and philosophers of old to learn things about the human body that were previously explained with magic and superstition. Naturally, science has come a long way since the ancient Greeks. Today, we have a whole host of medical resources at our disposal, which begs the question: Do we truly need animals in medical research anymore? Not only that, but the practices with animals at thousands of labs across the United States have been notoriously vague for years.

Read More
1456 Words | 6 Pages

Concerning the issue of animal testing and whether it is acceptable to subject animals to experimentation for medical research, I am in favor of scientists to continuing to perform medical research on animals because of the progress it has aided society. The research contributes to many cures, medicinal treatments, and it ensures the safety of products for people. Animal research also provides an ethical way of testing versus using human subjects as it provides a sample of a living organism similar such as chimpanzees. The animals are protected from abuse and mistreatment due to regulations and some are bred specifically for research. Researchers agree that having animal subjects are essential to their research as they are able to study a whole

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

The human medication always seems to fail because humans and animals have different physiologies. Scientists have tried so hard to find the cure for cancer in mice but have failed. In order to find the right cure they need to use the right cells.” regardless of one’s feelings about animals, it is time for consumers and taxpayers to realize that animal testing waste hundreds of millions of dollars annually and produces and inferior product(Overton).” Some people might think that animal testing is good for many reasons.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

However, that line of thinking quickly clashes with the fact that with the help of exactly such testing, with the sacrifice of those animal lives, human lives are saved in return. Who are we to object to the expedition of finding a cure for someone’s son’s or daughter’s illness on the basis that it would be cruel toward some animals, which fact is not up for debate, it is indeed downright monstrous. And if one person had the conviction to deny themselves the cure, what gives them the right to forbid others from using it. In the end the simplest question presents itself, whether testing experimental drugs and treatments on humans is more sane and logical rather than animal testing, and then there is a line which might as well cease progress. A line which demands not to be crossed, the line that demands human lives be handled with caution and care, the line which will cause baby steps instead of strives

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

For years, scientist, doctors, and researchers have been using controversial methods to make new medical breakthroughs. They started thousands of years ago on human and animal corpses. However, nowadays researchers use controversial methods of testing for many reasons, including testing a new drug to seeing what affect a new mascara will have. But now researchers are using living animals to test these products. These new tests hurt hundreds of animals, are inhumane, most of the time do not work, and goes against all teachings of kindness.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

However, both sides agree that it would be beneficial to reduce animal suffering by finding alternatives to this practice. On one side of the spectrum, supporters of animal testing point out how valuable the practice is to scientists, and the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research. According to the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), “…practically every drug, treatment, medical device, diagnostic tool or cure we have today was developed with the help of lab animals” (“Benefits of Biomedical Research”). The FBR is clearly stating that, without the help of animal testing, medical advances would be nearly impossible.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Monkey Love

Related Topics

Open Document