Should Passenger Cars Be Banned In Cities Essay

Although it might be harder for someone to get to places away from the city or that are really far away because they do not have a car; Passenger cars still should be banned in cities with extensive public transportation. The reasoning for this is that it would make the city a more healthy place to live. It creates jobs, and banning cars would help the environment. Makes the city a healthy place to live. Banning passenger cars would make a city with extensive public transportation a more healthy place to live in because it would get people outside walking and doing things more. If a city with extensive public transportation would ban passenger cars it would promote walking and make it easier for minors and other age groups to go out and do things without the need of a driver's license. It would create jobs. If a city would ban passenger cars the public transportation would need more able working bodies. The public transportation would need more people to work for them because the would be an increase in demand for public transportation meaning more

Banning passenger cars would make a city with lots of public transportation would make the city a more healthy place to live, it would create more jobs and banning passenger cars would decrease pollution. If we all work together we can make cities with lots of public transportation a more healthy place to live, create jobs, and be cleaner with just banning passenger cars from cities with lots of public transportation. In conclusion banning passenger cars for public transformation would promote people to get out making the city more health. Also it would also promote jobs, developing the city more, and it is more healthy for the environment because public transportation is ran by