Schools Paying to Play Multiple establishments are facing financial difficulties in today’s economy. Schools have been cutting money from particular funds, like athletic programs and extracurricular activities. Many districts have switched to pay-to-play for these expenses. Pay-to-play is when one has to pay an amount of money in order to participate in certain functions. Schools should support athletics, and not require pay-to-play. The pay-to-play requirement is harsh because families with multiple children can be put into a financial burden, less students will be able to play for a team, sports equipment already cost enough, and teams can do fundraising and sponsorships to cover the cost. Most of the families in a school district have more than one adolescent. When a school depends on the pay to play system, families with many children could be put in a financial burden. Having to worry about house bills and food to feed the whole family is already a lot of money. Expensing the extra cash for sports programs may push their limits. …show more content…
People like the fact that the school is getting more money and that their children might get more playing time due to lower numbers of students trying out. But in fact, the money just goes right to the school and not necessarily to that sports program. Teams will have less players and that could ruin practice situations, or if someone gets injured. Pay-to-play is should not be the go to decision for low income schools. Given these points, schools should not require pay-to-play. Financial burdens in families, less students playing for a team, the cost of equipment, and being able to fundraise or receiving a sponsorship are all factors in why students should not acquire a position on a team. Playing sports and being active throughout school is extremely important to an adolescent. Having to worry about not being able to afford sports should not be a