ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Shale Gas

585 Words3 Pages

Do you want to live with the possibility of life for our future generations to be dreadful because of pollution caused by us? If we use shale gas it will and is already leading to pollution by contaminating the waterways in Pennsylvania. I believe we should not use shale gas until we are able to fracture it without polluting the waterways. We should also start this process gradually instead of a big rush so that we are not too dependent on the gas. Currently we use coal, oil, and natural gas as energy sources to run our everyday lives. They are all nonrenewable resources, once they run out we will not have any more of them. We are looking for ways to find an energy source to use once we run out of our current nonrenewable energy sources. Shale gas is natural gas that is found trapped within …show more content…

Then millions of gallons of highly pressurized water mixed with sand and fracking chemicals are shot into the shale. The natural pressure forces liquid back up the well then the gas rushes up into the pipe. The well produces gas for years. However, it also releases wastewater from deep inside the shale. I do not support the use of shale gas. It has a contaminated waterway that is risking the lives of millions of humans and animals. In Pennsylvania it allowed methane to contaminate the water, which can cause the water to burn. This could potentially take years off of our lives.
One of the most abundant sources of shale gas is located in the Marcellus, which is located in Pennsylvania through New York. They are majorly populated states and the fracking of shale gas will disrupt the lives of millions and also if it pollutes it will endanger them as well. However, it will also create jobs and make the country's money which could help with our nation’s debt. But once all the shale gas is gone, it could possibly cause another great depression due to the dependency on the shale

Show More
Related
787 Words | 4 Pages

The Marcellus Shale It is the largest source of natural gas in the United States, and is located in Appalachian basin which stretches from Tennessee to New York and covers West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The Marcellus Shale has a lot of marine sedimentary rock because of the different sea level changes 400 million years ago that deposited minerals. It contains black shale and lighter shale mixed with limestone .It has many benefits, but it comes with disadvantage disadvantages. For humans to get access to the natural gas they have to drill deep into the ground and create a well which can go from 5,000 to 9,000 feet deep. They use a method of drilling called

Read More
2027 Words | 9 Pages

According to the EarthWorks government site there are some seriously negative health effects that come with fracking. This is due to all the chemicals used to make the fracking fluid and how they can make their way into contact with humans. These chemicals can be ingested in water, contact with skin, or even be respired by way of vapor. These chemicals can lead to health hazards in almost every area imaginable such as EarthWorks cited Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective by Theo Colborn where he broke these hazards into the 12 categories seen here: “skin, eye and sensory organ, respiratory, gastrointestinal and liver, brain and nervous system, immune, kidney, cardiovascular and blood, cancer, mutagenic, endocrine disruption, other, and ecological…”. There are 71 chemicals used in fracking that are known to cause 10 or more health effects individually.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Numerous people argue that tapping into the earth’s shale in this manner causes seismic activity. Generating little earthquakes deep within the earth’s core. Providing entry for the chemical mixture used in the fracking process to bleed into ground water, and water wells leaving them contaminated. Majority of the time these little earthquakes go undetected on the earth’s surface. Arguments that fumes from these chemical mixtures and gasses escape and ooze into the earth’s atmosphere furthermore causing harmful life changing consequences such as terminal cancer and birth defects.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

About a third of United State's electricity generation is fueled by natural gas, and since most of it is produced from the US itself, it’s not a surprise that some people are hailing it “the clean energy of the future”. But really, how clean is natural gas anyway?     Hydraulic fracking is the process used to produce a third of the natural gas in the US. First, a well is drilled and a steel pipe casing is inserted into the well. Then, a mixture of water and other chemicals are pumped into the formation.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

This affects the surrounding area by turning the area around into roadways for the transport trucks(Pros and Cons of Fracking), it disrupts the locals(Pros and Cons of Fracking), and the soil in the surrounding area is being tainted with chemicals(Potential Health and Environmental Effects of Hydrofracking in the Williston Basin,

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

That can be reduced through the enforcement of regulations that the fracking companies would have to adhere to. For those who disagree and would rather have clean and green sources of energy, think of hydraulic fracturing and the use of natural gas as an option for energy to buy us time to make a plan until better technology is created for clean

Read More
49 Words | 1 Pages

1. Even though fracking reduces carbon emissions, it is still harmful to the environment. For example: water pollution/contamination. There can be accidental seeping of the chemicals (possibly carcinogenic) and can contaminate groundwater around the site due to bad practice (this imposes harm to both the ecosystem and people 's health).

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

According to Climatecentral.org, “fracking for natural gas used to produce electricity may make Texas more drought resistant as the state shifts from coal power generation to natural gas power generation” (Magill). This could be a major breakthrough for Texas because not only would we produce electricity and save our environment, but we would also save millions of gallons of water. The amount of water we could save by shifting from coal to natural gas plants “is up to 50 times the amount of water lost in fracking to extract the natural gas from underground shale formations. According to the article, “The study’s authors estimate that for every gallon of water used to frack for natural gas, Texas saved 33 gallons of water by using that gas for electricity generation rather than producing the same amount of power with coal” (Magill).

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

These setbacks are a great danger to our environment. We need to seek change and pursue better and cleaner energy sources. Twenty-one states currently allow fracking. Those states are experience a “fracking boom.” Growth in jobs, increased community conditions, and making the U.S less dependent on foreign oil.

Read More
1699 Words | 7 Pages

Fracking has actually been taking place since the 1940’s, but not until it was combined with horizontal drilling was it extremely useful (“Hydraulics” 71-75). In the past fifteen years the fracking business has skyrocketed. By 2015 thirty-five thousand wells are using fracking methods in order to extract the natural gases each year. Ninety percent of all gas production in the United States would be impossible without fracking (“Hydraulics” 71-75). More than ninety percent of natural gas wells in the U.S. rely on fracking (Howarth, Ingraffea, and Engelder).

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

There are at this time, over 1.1 million operating wells in the United States. While yes, fracking has a number of disadvantages, it does reap benefits. Whether or not a person is pro fracking, it does accumulate a large lump sum of money. It is stated that the 48 states should benefit from this and should receive an economic boost.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Compassionate Americans John F. Kennedy said, “Ask what you can do for your country?” In order to answer President J.F. K., I would like to use Keri Wyatt Kent’s words. She said in her book “Simple Compassion,” that to make a difference in our country we need to cut back on our spending. Thus, the Americans’ way of living are frugal. It is justified for the following reasons.

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

I am really neutral on the issue. I know there are benefits to fracking for natural gas. It is better for the climate than fossil fuels, and it is cheaper. What I do not know is the extent of the damages it can potentially cause. It is a relatively new practice, and enough time has not passed to cause justification or condemnation.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

1. Introduction 1.1 What is hydraulic fracturing? Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is the process of drilling down into the earth’s surface, followed by a high-pressure water mixture, which is directed at the rocks to release the gas and oil that is inside of them. Furthermore water, sand, chemicals and other substances are injected into the rock at a high pressure, in order to allow the gas in the rock to flow out and up to the top of the fracking wells.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Our natural resources are at risk every time fracking occurs. Fracking needs to be banned since it is hurting our health and that it drains our natural and limited resources required for us to sustain life.    Water is an essential to living and it is a need. Without it we would be dead from the dehydration. Fracking in this case can contaminate it to where we cannot drink it and if we do it can lead to death or a trip to the hospital:

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Shale Gas

Related Topics

Open Document