ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On The Benefits Of Expanding The House Of Representatives

536 Words3 Pages

The United States House of Representatives is one of the two houses of Congress, the legislative branch of the federal government. The House of Representatives is composed of 435 voting members, who are elected every two years from their respective congressional districts. However, many experts believe that this number is too low to effectively represent the interests and needs of the American people. In this essay, I will argue that the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives should be expanded to better serve the American people. First and foremost, expanding the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives would help to ensure that every American citizen is more accurately represented. With only 435 representatives, each member of Congress is responsible for representing an average of over 700,000 people. This means that many Americans do not have a direct voice in Congress and their needs and interests may not be adequately represented. By increasing the number of representatives, we can reduce the size of each congressional district, thereby ensuring that each representative is better able to represent their constituents. Moreover, an increase in the number of representatives would also help to reduce the influence of money in politics. With fewer representatives, it is easier for wealthy …show more content…

With more representatives, it would be easier to form and build coalitions around specific issues and policies. This would help to reduce the gridlock that currently plagues Congress and make it easier for lawmakers to pass meaningful legislation. Additionally, an increase in the number of representatives would help to reduce the workload of each individual member of Congress, allowing them to spend more time focusing on the needs and concerns of their

Show More
Related
1453 Words | 6 Pages

So, we know by now there’s the House of Representatives and the Senate in the legislative branch, the amount of members in each are based off a compromise between the Virginia plan and the New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for the votes in congress to be based on population, while New Jersey called for the votes to be equal amount states. The House of Representatives is based of the population idea of the Virginia Plan, consisting of no more then 435 members, each state has proportional representation based on population. The Senate, however, is based of the New Jersey Plan, each state having two senators, equal representation among all the states. This way, big states have an advantage in the House, small states have the advantage in the Senate making it very balanced.

Read More
1794 Words | 8 Pages

Voting participation is one of the most importing things in are government. We really need for citizens to step up and voice their opinions and get involved in the united states government. In conclusion I really thing that it would be awesome for the government to get more unified and come together despite our differences and pass laws that can help get this country back on track. In this country without unity we will continues to see congressional gridlock without

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

It is important to note that each district only gets one representative regardless of the district’s population size. Therefore, gerrymandering creates a very unequal Congressional representation because it can give seats to a party even when the majority of the people in that district do not want them there. This paper will aim to discuss the flaws as well as benefits of gerrymandering, the situation today with recent news of gerrymandering in America, and potential compromises and solutions regarding gerrymandering for the future. II.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

This states that even though that bigger states have more representatives, it puts the limit that the number of representatives for each state by ensuring that one state doesn’t exceed one for every thirty thousand people. This prevents tyranny in the House of Representatives. In Article 1, Section 3 it states, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures thereof for six years; and each senator shall have one vote.” (Source: Constitution of the United States of America, 1787.) This article means that every state has two senators so it doesn’t matter how big a population of a state is.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Moreover, under the Articles each state only has between two or seven delegates in congress, while in the Constitution each has two members in the Senate and one Representative per 300 thousand people. since states with bigger populations wanted representation to be solely based on population and states with smaller populations wanted there to be a fixed number of representatives per state, regardless of size or population, The Connecticut Compromise resolved this issue by forming the two houses

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

a fair amount of senators and represenative in the house of representatives. In document D, article 1, section 2, house of representatives, clause 3 states: "Representatives shall be appointed to population. The number shall not exceed 1 for every thirty-thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative". This article and section are stating that every state shall have a number of representatives based on population. Article 1, section 3, Senate, clause 1 states, "The Senate of the United states shall be composed of the two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures there of for six years; and each senator shall have one vote".

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

This allows the politicians to select one representative from each district to represent the majority of the voters in that district. This can benefit a political party because it allows them to have more seats in the house. “Eliminating gerrymandering would not by itself dramatically increase the competitiveness of house and state….between the two major political parties” (Mann, Thomas

Read More
1953 Words | 8 Pages

“...the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters” (Document F). States with less population have more say than a state with a larger population. California’s population is 70 times larger than the state of Wyoming’s. A larger population should have more say. the idea should not be that smaller states should have more representation because they are smaller; it should be that a state with larger population should have more representation.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Proportional representation is the easiest, fairest way not only to eliminate the desire for gerrymandering but also to rein in extremism. If you get 51% of a district's vote, you don't get the entire seat; you get 51% of it. Your opponent, who won 49%, doesn't get nothing; she/he gets 49% of it. That's exactly representative of the people's will. It also means the more people you attract, the more value your legislative vote has.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Federalist No. 58 states that there will be one representative in the house per thirty thousand inhabitants. Every state will have at least one representative. Small and anti-federalist states may think that this is unfair, but it’s essential for progress. A mandatory unanimous vote to pass an amendment is not

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Regarding this, within the House of Representatives, “every state will receive a number of representatives based on their own population.” This strategy gives every state a fair amount of representation based on their population. However, based on this, some states are ought to be much more powerful when it comes to representation, and the smaller states would not have much of a say when it comes to legislation. Nevertheless, the constitution introduces the Senate. The Senate levels out the playing field when it comes to representation by creating a body of congress that is “composed of two senators from each state.”

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

p. 275 There are 435 seats in the House of Representatives that must be distributed among the 50 states. Reapportionment is the process of redistributing the congressional seats among the 50 states. Some states might gain seats and some might lose seats.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

Meaning that there would be a grand total of 36 representatives for an entire nation, can you imagine? Mr. Butler 's proposal was

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

A citizen should act upon their free will or judgement without having the pressures of society around them. The House of Representatives member should worry about the diverse community values rather than the citizen. Even if they are in a specific party they do not have to vote upon what that party thinks what is

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

In Document D, it says, “The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand but each state shall have at least one representative… The Senate of the United States shall be composed by the legislatures thereof for six years, and each

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On The Benefits Of Expanding The House Of Representatives

Related Topics

Open Document