ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

839 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Speeches against animal testing

“To my mind, the life of a lamb is no less precious than that of a human being. The more helpless the creature, the more that it is entitled to protection by man from the cruelty of man," this was once said by Mahatma Gandhi on why we should appreciate animals as much as human beings. Animals are gifts from God and without them, the world would not be complete. Millions of animals are subjected to imprisonment and have terrible procedures done in order to satisfy our needs. By needs, these creatures are being tortured or killed for the products we use. How would you feel if we were to trade places with these animals for experiments? Wouldn’t it be the same thing since animals are living things too? Animals can suffer like humans do, so it is speciesism to experiment on them while we refrain from experimenting on humans. According to Dr Hadwen Trust (n.d.) from Cruelty Free International, at least 115 million animals would be used in experiments worldwide each year and as a responsible human being, we have to put a stop to this …show more content…

The innocent animals are being abused without any reason. The only product that is forced by law, to test on animals, are certain types of chemicals and pharmaceutical products. However, in Draize Test, the scientist rub shampoo, soap, lipstick or lawn products into the white albino rabbit eyes for a long period of time. Torturing and exploiting animals should not be a justification to make human’s life better. Researches and testing on animals cannot be justified on the basis that animals resembles human in so many ways. Feelings, thoughts, and needs of the animals which are similar to human should be respected, not exploited because of the selfishness of humans. Human should not use animals as tools to fulfil their needs without any consideration towards the animals. As stated by Tom Regan (n.d.), animals are subjects to life and a subject of a life has fundamental

Show More
Related
270 Words | 2 Pages

A life is a life, i think that every living organisms on this planet that are breathing are important and we all should treat others with respect and with love. Animals are like us, not physically, but they can feel pain and lonely when we mistreated them in some ways. I believe humanity has the ethical obligation to change their behavior towards animals. In the article, “ A change of Hearts on Animals” written by Jeremy Rifkin stated some of his key points that humans should focuses more on animals’ feelings.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Currently people are treating animals with disrespect by abusing , eating , and slaughtering them. In his article “ A Change of about Animals,” Rifkin points out that “ they feel pain , suffer , and experience stress , affection , excitement and even love--- and these findings are changing how we view animals.” In the article “ A Change of Heart about animals,” Rifkin points out that “ they feel pain , suffer , and experience stress , affection , excitement and even love--- and these findings are changing how we view

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart about Animals”, proves his statement that many of our fellow creatures also “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love..”. I agree that animals share similar feelings as us, and I believe that they should be treated in a way that they can feel comfortable and care in their surroundings. Just because animals may not be completely the same as us, that should not give the right to a human to mistreat and abuse of an animal’s life. Animals can be well treated and cared for without giving them the right to be treated as a human.

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

One of these global crises is animal cruelty, which is very dangerous to animals. Animal cruelty affects wildlife and can cause devastating effects on the food chain and food supply. Although animal cruelty benefits people, it is unethical towards the animal hurt in the process and should be stopped. First

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Mistreating animals as if one does not care for them is the same as mistreating humans. By mistreating poor doubtless animals it affects them and can sometimes lead into suffering stress. If humans are able to protect each other from harm, then why cannot animals do the same thing by having rights? This question is usefully asked for those who try to protect the rights of animals. In the article Of Primates and Personhood the author Ed Yong, a science journalist, contends, “I feel we should extend rights to a wide range of nonhuman animals… ‘all creatures that can feel pain should have a basic moral status’”

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

Yet, it really is not. For years we have slaughtered animals, treated them poorly, abused them and caused them pain and suffering. As Singer mentions, killing animals will take away their vital meaning for a trivial purpose, “Their flesh is a luxury, consumed because people like its taste”. As I read Singer’s argument I felt guilt and uneasiness, a guilt that was not justifiable. In the past, I used to think those who slaughter animals are more at fault.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing has been part of science and education as far back as the 2th century BCE. They have been subjects to experiments that were revolutionary to science, done out of curiosity, and/or even help to create life-saving treatments. Yet those who are always at the disadvantage were the animals themselves. In 1655, physiologist Edmund O’Meara was recorded expressing his opposition against animal testing, and in 1822, the British parliament implemented the first animal protection law. It is now currently 2017, so should we ban animal experimenting altogether?

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries

Read More
1566 Words | 7 Pages

Animal Testing Should Be Banned Animal testing also known animal experimentation is a process whereby non-human animals are used to conduct experiments. There has been an increase of animal testing in the field of biomedical research. Due to this, animal testing has become an extreme controversial topic that has created a division among different groups, of those who are supporting the process and those who are opposing. Therefore, there are ongoing debates on whether animal testing should go on or it should be banned. Some groups argue it is ethical, while others insist that the process is unethical, and there is a last group advocating for alternatives in the testing other than the use of animals.

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

They do not breed certain kinds of animals for their food. However, humans breed a certain kind of animals just for food and these animals are always enclosed in a small place. These actions deprive animals’ right and violate the

Read More
1435 Words | 6 Pages

INTRODUCTION “The greatness of a nation is judged by the way it treats its animals” - Mahatma Gandhi Whether at home, on the farm, or at the dining table, animals play an important role in day-to-day life in the society. They happen to be companions, a source of livelihood, entertainment, inspiration, and of course food and clothing to people all over the world. Yet animals can and do exist independent from people and, as living beings, they arguably have certain interests separate from their utility to humanity. As such, the society is increasingly faced with legal, economic, and ethical dilemmas about the proper status for animals and the extent to which their interests should be respected, even when these conflict with what is best for humans. These aspects have resulted in a new

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Sadly, society continues to take less and less accountability for the pain and suffering we inflict on animals as a whole. I plan to argue that animals are sentient whereby acknowledging their ability to suffer and worthy of moral consideration. The basic premise of rights establishes that members of society are free of undue suffering in its various forms. An animal although not equal to humans should be afforded some level of protection under the same principle. If not, we as a society remain the latter and actively condone

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

Related Topics

Open Document