ipl-logo

Peter Singer The Solution To World Poverty Analysis

944 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Peter singer’s “the singer solution to world poverty essasy

According to “The Solution to World Poverty” written by Peter Singer we should donate money which would be spent on luxuries in order to save children, to keep them alive from two to six years old (Singer 4). Most of his arguments are backed by strong arguments. Human life is not comparable with other values of our lives. It cannot be bought with money, since the abolition of slavery, or exchanged for property or pleasure. That is why we must appreciate it and sacrifice some of our benefits to at least have a chance for saving someone’s live. Peter Singer follows a method of an effective altruism which has an aim to save the largest possible number of people, however, the pursuit of quantity often affects the quality. Although Peter Singer …show more content…

After avoiding month amount of entertainments, you could save a child, for this you just donate about “$200 to save a child 's life” (Singer 4). After people donate money to charity companies they feel like they have made the world a little bit better. But, wait a minute. In the reality, we still have a 6-year-old child somewhere and of whom no one cares anymore, while there is no guarantee that after this period the child will be provided shelter, food or education. He will simply be thrown out on the chance. It is hard to imagine what the child has to endure in the age of six without bread and butter, let alone the fact that he is even unlikely to receive education or clothing. What remains? If the child 's craving for life would be strong, then one of the most perspective options for survival would be …show more content…

He points out that we should look for the most effective ways to save the largest possible number of people. For example, he said that instead of buying a guide dog for only one person, about five hundred people can be cured of eye-related diseases on the same money. On the other hand, according to his own words, he did not mind sacrificing a few countries in order to save more children. However, with the same success, we could distribute the money so that the number of children doubled and cut theirs the life expectancy by half. If we would let them live for two to four years old much more number of lives can be saved they are likely to die immediately after the fourth birthday, but who cares, we saved them. The ability to see the consequences of our actions plays a significant role in charity. After saving child’s life you have to be responsible for it, because sustaining life in the child and then leave him to die to support the survival of another one is inhumanly. Singer attaches importance to quantity rather than quality without taking over any responsibility for the lifes of

Show More
Related
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Please help the children of this third world country by donating just one dollar a day. You can’t turn on the television without seeing a commercial asking you to donate to help feed the impoverished or to supply much needed medicine. In the article, “What Should a Billionaire Give – and What Should You?” the author attempts to make a point of giving money to charitable organizations, much like these commercials. Peter Singer’s article dives into the realm of philanthropy in order to aid the impoverished by appealing to logic through reasoning and statistics, and emotion by using examples throughout the writing.

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

The Singer Solution to World Poverty” written by Peter Singer. In the essay that Peter Singer wrote has a main point which is to give solution to the world poverty and how to deal with with the situation to end it. The article narrates that the philosophy Peter Singer demonstrate about the world poverty.

Read More
1699 Words | 7 Pages

In Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he argues the importance of donation to poor people, which could mean the difference between life and death for children in need. He gives an example for Bob, who has an opportunity to save a child’s life, but he could lose his worthy car. He makes a comparison between people who are capable to donate money to save children lives and people who have no chance to help or donate under certain situation such as Bob. He also encourages people who are in the middle class to donate at a minimum of 200$; furthermore, he thinks that people should donate more like 200.000$ when they consider the level of sacrifice that they would demand of Bob’s situation. He gives some estimates for the amount of donations that people should give to overseas.

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

By repeating this number multiple times, following with “to save a child’s life,” throughout his essay, Singer implies a rational yet urgent tone in order to convince the reader that if they donate, they will save a

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Peter Singer argues that prosperous people should donate their excess money to the overseas aid groups. When saying this, he believes Americans should stop spending their money on luxuries such as a TV, a computer, a car, and videogames. Instead of spending money on items such as that, he thought we should start sending money to those who are starving in other countries and need our help. There are pros and cons to Singer’s argument and both can be greatly supported.

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

Peter Singer himself writes, “We can give to organizations like Unicef or Oxfam America” (Singer, 737). If the wealthy people were to help the poor out, there is no reason to bother in using children of the poor to feed the wealthy. The money that will be provided can go into making shelters in which those children can live happily. There is no reason for those who do not trust organizations, to be selfish. They themselves can create their own organization, give children shelters and their parents a job as well.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

Based on this we can infer that individuals should go out of their way to help others out. Without Doc’s help, the sick people may have died. This influences the idea that individuals should help others because it would make a difference in the world. Like characterization, emotional appeal can be also used to define the role of the

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

In his article, The Singer Solution, Peter Singer argues that citizens of affluent nations are failing to do their moral duty, which is to donate far more to charity than they actually do. The article starts by referring to the Brazilian film Central Station where a miserable retired schoolteacher named Dora is faced with a choice. She could pocket an impressive $1000, but she must first convince a homeless 9 year old to follow her to a certain location where she is told he would be adopted. After spending the $1000 on a new TV, Dora learns that the boy would actually be killed and his organs sold. Dora decides to get the boy back, but what if Dora decided to look the other way after learning of the boy’s fate?

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Money: the root of most social problems and one of the few matters that almost everyone has an opinion on. Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” a newspaper article, is no exception. Singer argues that one should donate all unnecessary money to the less fortunate because of the morality of the situation. However, though the goal is noble, his commentary is very ineffective due to its condescending tone, lack of hard facts, and overall extremism. The piece is written by Peter Singer, an Australian professor of bioethics at Princeton University.

Read More
1805 Words | 8 Pages

Due to this reason, Singer states that the fair donation argument fails and would not be enough to fix the problem. Now that we have an understanding of Singer’s beliefs, I can show how Singer would respond to the question given in the prompt. Peter would say that yes he should donate, but the small amounts he would be choosing to donate would be nowhere near the amount that he should be choosing to give. Singer would say that any money that he isn’t spending on necessities should be donated to help those in dire situations, and that not doing so is

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Singer attempts to close this gap with the age old question of ‘why don’t we give the riches’ money to the poor’. The essence of Singer’s argument is obviously end world poverty. Probably the strongest point made in Singer’s argument is the involvement of the whole world. By taking this money from those across the world eliminates the opportunity for indifference. To stand with indifference is to stand with the oppressor.

Read More
3128 Words | 13 Pages

Philip Manning 12504697 Q) Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. There can be no doubt that Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ is unrealistic, unfair and not sustainable. Singer’s arguments are valid arguments but not sound. In order to get a clear and balanced view of my arguments which disprove the Singer article, it is first necessary to examine and lay out the main aspects of Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My arguments against Singer’s claims shall then be detailed and examined in depth.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

In one circumstance, we may feel the need to give to those who are poor to keep them from getting in our personal space; and in other circumstances we feel that we give to others out of the kindness of our heart. I completely agree with Ascher and her views on compassion, because I have been in similar situation where I have questioned why people give money, and whether they give with a whole heart or out of necessity. Furthermore, this essay can teach us plenty of lessons that can be utilized throughout our lives so we can teach others and make them aware of the need to be more

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

What is Microaggression? Break down the word microaggression to micro and aggression. Micro means small and aggression means to be pushy, so with that being said is must mean being pushy in a small manor. In these couple of cases it does not. Microaggression can be a huge ordeal.

Read More
1154 Words | 5 Pages

Not being able to have food, not having enough for the week, and not knowing where to get food for your starving child are all defined in what is known as “food insecurity”. According to the resources, nearly 84 % of client households with children report purchase the cheapest food available knowing that it wasn’t the healthiest option just as an effort to provide enough food for their family. On top of that, Among Feeding America, a federal program, client households with children, nearly 9 in 10 households are food insecure (“Child Hunger”). This is not okay for anyone but most importantly children. According to another source, children are growing and need healthy food sources in order for them to grow into healthy, confident adults.

Read More

More about Peter Singer The Solution To World Poverty Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document