The informative text “Planet protectors monthly bulletin delivers a far more powerful message than “The Last Tree” , because the structure is far easier to understand, the analytical images give detailed information, and the topic is obvious whereas the last tree need to read the whole story to find out the topic and still, the topic isn’t directly said the reader need to infer it. The text structure, language features and visual images all work together to create a very persuasive argument. The two texts “Planet Protectors’ monthly Bulletin” and “The Last Tree” are structured very differently such as, “the last tree is structured like a narrative without chapters, so it must be read from start to finish so the reader can infer what it is about, on the other hand, Planet Protectors monthly bulletin the reader just need to read the section of the information that is needed without getting confused. Also, planet protector’s monthly bulletin uses and big attention-grabbing title “Deforestation — a global dilemma”. This makes the reader wonder why is it a global dilemma and how could I help. …show more content…
The last tree mainly uses emotive language which can make the reader feel as if it is fictional story and that it is supposed to be entertaining. So, they won’t see it as an urgent issue and they won’t raise a concern. On the other hand, “Planet Protector monthly bulletin” uses factual and scientific. This language helps to pursue the reader that deforestation is an urgent issue. Some examples of scientific language are “green gasses”, “erosion” and “biodiversity”. These are all someof the negative affects of deforestation. So, for these reasons the “Planet protecters mounthly bulletin” uses better language features than the literary text “The Last