During our analysis, we will comment on the Platonic problem of virtue and its unity, as it emerges through the dialogue between Socrates and Menon. We examined the essence of virtue and the difficulties it carries in order to understand the relationship between the conditions of moral action, the possibility of learning, policy development and reason psychic harmony, that is to say, to determine how the concept of virtue, and in particular the consequences of seeking its definition, brings together and directs a set of fields. Meno is a Platonic dialogue in which Socrates and Meno are trying to find the definition of virtue, its nature, so whether virtue can be taught or, if not, how it is obtained. Initially, the review question is therefore …show more content…
How to find something that you know nothing? Socrates uses the theory of reminiscence. He questions a little slave, who never studied science and is, by itself, how to build a double square of a given square. Socrates then find the little slave elements of geometry that he was never taught him. He discovers truths that everyone can find in itself; I 'âme may, in fact, recollection of what she saw or looked elsewhere: it preserves reminiscences knowledge acquired before birth. Therefore learn is recollecting.
The reminiscence of theory occupies an important place in the "system" Platonist, at least if one considers his work synthetically and in order to reach a positive doctrine. There would be the a priori in every act of knowledge and soul would not be a tabula rasa in which sense knowledge is printed. The sensory experience would have only used for search of scientific and philosophical knowledge, because knowledge is already within us: we can not find outside itself, but in itself. The theory of reminiscence is the bridge between the sensible and the intelligible in the ontological dualism of Plato, and implies that the soul is existing in earth life. And it is in this part of the Meno (from 80th to 86c) Plato exposes this theory