ipl-logo

Plea Bargaining Analysis

989 Words4 Pages

The Summary of My Testimony on Plea-Bargaining State legislators are considering a bill that bans all plea-bargaining in our state. As the leading expert on plea-bargaining, I’m aware of the instrumental role that it plays in our justice system. Therefore, I’m grateful that this committee wants to hear from me. From the outset, I would like to state my definitive position on this matter: that state legislators should not ban plea bargaining. To support this position, I offer the following testimony. The Stakeholders and How a Plea-Bargaining Ban Will Affect Them The stakeholders who benefit from plea-bargaining include judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, defendants, and the courts. Because of the proximity of these stakeholders, a ban …show more content…

First, a ban on plea-bargaining will increase the number of trial cases, thus requiring more time, money, and lawyers. To illustrate, when the state of Oklahoma considered the ban, former Oklahoma District Attorney, Wes Lane, stated that “there’s just not enough resources, judges, prosecutors and staff to remove plea deals.” He went on to say that a ban would require an annual budget increase from $8 million to $80 million cite. This leads to the second reason: It requires more from tax payers. The constitution mandates certain duties of the justice system—adequate representation, the right to an attorney, etc.—which require public funding. Today, relevant stakeholders petition for an increase in that funding because the current budget is inadequate. If the current justice system is deficient financially, imagine the cost for a system without plea bargaining—It would require an astronomical increase in public funding. The final reason, is that plea bargaining aids mutual interests. According to Courts: A Test/Reader, stakeholders favor plea-bargaining because it furthers “mutual interest in avoiding conflict, reducing uncertainty, and maintaining group cohesion (Cassia, …show more content…

After the judge formally reads criminal charges during the arraignment, the court expects the defendant to enter a plea. These charges are typically the maximum punishment that a defendant will face if they decide to go to trial, but the prosecutor presents a plea-deal giving the defendant the option to plead guilty to a lesser charge. A ban removes this option, however, requiring a plea of ”guilty“, ”not guilty“, or ”no contest“. Sentence Bargaining. A sentence bargain is similar to a charge bargain, but rather than the defendant pleading down to a lesser charge, they plead to a lesser sentence. The defendant pleads guilty to the formal charges read during the arraignment in exchange for a lighter sentence. A ban removes this option and increases the sentencing of guilty defendants. Trial. A ban on plea-bargaining will increase the number of cases that go to trial, which will require more public funding. Additionally, the surge of cases increases the likelihood of a dismissal because defendants have a right to a speedy

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

The author looks at the time period that the three were released and discusses the reason for their release, which is Alford plea. In this case, the defendant is voluntarily forced to plead guilty while still proclaiming his or her innocence. The author also looks at the evidence and ends up concluding that that there was little evidence that linked the defendants to the murder. In addition, the author criticizes the state’s government for forcing the men to plead guilty. Using another case, the author looks into this matter by examining the flaws related to the Alford’s plea.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

In today's era, when a criminal is charged for various crimes their given a shortcut to justice by simply accepting a plea deal. In this case, Larry Servedio faces multiple felonies: first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape, third-degree rape, third-degree criminal sexual act, third-degree criminal mischief, criminal impersonation, second-degree grand larceny, and second-degree strangulation. Servedio was also indicted for several misdemeanor charges: first-degree harassment, second-degree aggravated harassment, second-degree menacing and torturing and injuring an animal. If Mr. Servedio goes to trial and is able to prove his innocence of the charges pressed against him, then he is a free man and all charges get dropped. Yet, if Mr. Servedio

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

CSU Long Beach, Political Science Department at Long Beach Municipal and Superior Court, Long Beach CA Legal Apprentice and Researcher 1996-1997 • Conducted political research on the public defender system and provided analysis by viewing, discussing and summarizing judicial procedure(s) and Trial Judge, District Attorney, Public Defender to gain a better understanding of the efficacy of the public defender system on criminal proceedings in Long Beach and its need for key structural improvement. Accomplishments: After reading Gideon’s Trumpet as a context by which to explore and analyze the public defenders system and the social injustices that often occur, as reference by the main characters denial of his legal right to receive legal counsel in his defense in a Florida court; I related my reading and first hand experiences, observations and findings on the efficacy or lack thereof of the Public Defenders system to supervising professors at the CSU Long Beach, Department of Political Science in an attempt to suggest needed improvements to the criminal justice and judicial system. CSU Long Beach, Office of Affirmative Action - Long Beach,

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with less than the maximum sentence. For example, the prosecution and the defense may agree to a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony charge or the parties may agree to a sentence of 12 years instead of 20 years if the recommended sentence for that crime is 10-20 years imprisonment.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

In the criminal justice system there are is a large amount of criminal cases. The court system wants to get rid of these cases as quickly as possible for maximum efficiency. That is where plea bargaining comes in to play. It helps the court

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

I negate the resolution; Plea bargaining ought to be abolished in the United States criminal justice system. I value  societal welfare defined as the application of judicial practices and protection of society. My criterion to support my value is developing an effective justice system. This means that in a world of compromise, the most success is achieved by giving the greatest good to the greatest number of people. This belief applies directly to plea bargaining, the most justice must be delt to the greatest number of people.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

The Bill of Rights 6th Amendment In the United States there are rights that have been established, and has been there in place for a long time now. There are some people that break the laws and commit crimes, these individuals will end up being arrested and will eventually have their case heard before a Judge. In fact, these individuals are called the accused. There are presumed innocent until proven guilty, in the United States Governments.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Oxford Dictionary of Law, plea bargaining is to be defined as "an agreement between the prosecution and the defense by which the accused agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge in return for an offer by the prosecution" This entails that the two sides of the criminal case will come together in agreement of a punishment without having the case go to trial (Plea bargaining, 2015). II . Discuss the purpose of plea bargaining and the impact this practice has on the criminal justice system. According to the American Bar Association, plea bargaining is prevalent due to several factors.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. legal system has numerous pros and cons discovered throughout history and the ambiguous system is a glorious quality. The American public has the right to decided whether the legal system’s benefits outweigh the

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

Also when entering a plea you are allowed to consult a lawyer before getting yourself into a plea bargain. Many defendants enter pleas without knowing the consequences. Gideon

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the courts are backlogged and many public defenders and judges being overworked, this causes plea bargaining to be used repeatedly. According to Walker et al. (2018), plea bargaining leaves many people no option but to plea guilty even when this is not their best option. This is due to a multitude of reasons but mainly to receive a lesser charge. For example, a felony and little time in jail may be better than risking multiple felonies and an excessive amount of time in jail.

Read More
1998 Words | 8 Pages

The criminal court system is filled with multiple different types of actors and viewers. There are judges, prosecutors, bailiffs, the jury, and many more. The criminal defense attorneys seem to be pushed to the side, being deemed not as important, as if the job of representing the accused and ensuring their Constitutional rights are protected is not important. These attorneys work tirelessly to ensure those being charged with a crime receive the proper representation they deserve, and the courts uphold the regulations held to them. Through the history of criminal defense, the exploration of the various types of defense attorneys, the ethical dilemmas specific to defense attorneys, and the need for them in the American system of justice, it

Read More

More about Plea Bargaining Analysis

Open Document