The Zombie March
1. What is the title of the text and what is the text about? Title: Zombie March The story was about a husband that died and promised his wife he will come back and see her when dead. The husband comes back to their home after he’s pronounced dead and is now a zombie. But when he comes back, the wife is not as excited to see him as he had hoped and the wife tells him, “I’m not coming with you” (MacNabb; 2012).
2. What is the author’s view? How do I know? The author’s view point is that this is not your typical zombie story. Brynn MacNabb shows a level of intelligence usually not seen in zombie stories when the husband says “Amber, “he said. (“Not brains”) (MacNabb; 2012).
3. What is the evidence presented by the author to support ideas?
…show more content…
The author supports the idea of a different kind of zombie by not talking about zombies, blood and guts throughout the story. This also becomes crystal clear when the author notes (Not “brains.”) (MacNabb; 2012). After the Zombies talk to her on her door step that has now become a stop on the Zombie March. 4. Is the evidence valid? How do I know? This is a fictional story so there aren’t any facts to validate per say. But I do think that the author shows evidence of a story that does not depict a typical zombie story where the zombies are out for brains. I know this because the zombies in this story talk, instead of just moaning and groaning alone. Also, the zombies seem to portray a unique level of intelligence with talking to the newly widowed wife about not only her husband, but politics, marching to the Lincoln Memorial, suicide and the overall hope for the zombie race. 5. Is the evidence relevant? How do I