Population And Demographic Changes In Texas, 1865-1920

1455 Words6 Pages

The population of Texas changed in many ways between the years 1865-1920. One such way was the 272% population increase, over three million residents, in 1900 (304). Though the population of whites increased during this time, the population of black residents decreased. The largest group of foreigners in Texas were originally Germans, but they were replaced by immigrants from Mexico. However, despite the great increase of foreign-born residents, the majority of new residents came from other southern states who sought to recover from the ruin and turmoil left by the Civil War (304). With such a dramatic increase in population, the economy flourished.
The three products that dominated the Texas economy were flour, lumber, and coal (308). All …show more content…

One such reform called for an end to the convict lease system in 1914. This was a success for the Progressives because it ensured a more fair treatment for prisoners (341). Unfortunately, a failure of the Progressives would be their inability to help the handicapped citizens of Texas in 1910 (341) before the creation of the Austin State School in 1915, which was an institution for the mentally retarded (348). The Progressives were also successful in supporting equality for women and their rights when they allowed married women to own and control their own property instead of their husbands owning everything (336). Overall, with very few failures, the Progressives were relatively successful in creating reforms for females, and education, and working conditions. In 1901, Galveston created an undemocratic system of appointive government, which was a major milestone during the Progressive Era (335). President Roosevelt even endorsed the commission form, which lead to about 500 cities across the nation to follow the commission as well (335). Unfortunately, by 1920, progressivism ideals dwindled when most Texans preferred to take advantage of the business opportunities that took place during the decade instead of worrying about the problems of the state (357). In conclusion, the Progressives during the progressive era were by far more successful than unsuccessful when it comes to the reforms and advancements they made to solve the issues of new