Potry Tech Case Essay

744 Words3 Pages

This case is about a company that has been wrongfully accused of polluting into the bay. The evidence that we are about to give will indicate that Poultry Tech will not be adding more pollution to the bay by building a hotel on our land. During this trial, Poultry Tech will prove that we can build a hotel on our land and not harm the Chesapeake Bay. This hotel that we are planning to build will create many new job opportunities for the people of Waterville. It will also bring many new people to our small town which will create new businesses and can increase our town’s popularity. Your honor, we have conducted all of the experiments needed to get the permits to build this hotel. The EPA has confirmed that our studies are scientifically correct. …show more content…

His parents had just cut him off, and he had good intentions to pay back his roommate after he forged a check. Logan Rivers had received serious consequences, and has learned his lesson about being honest, especially to the government. Logan Rivers shouldn’t be judged because of the mistake he made as a young college student. Today, he successfully works through issues at Poultry Tech to collect data and create reports to present to the EPA and is one of our most important and best workers. He will testify that Poultry Tech has all of the permits needed to build the Pocahontas Hotel and Casino__. Our next witness is Dr. Bailey Nadeau. Dr. Nadeau founded the Harbor Research and received a Phd at Yale University. Dr. Nadeau currently specializes in water pollution computer modeling. He did tests of agricultural to recreational commercial uses and found out that the Pocahontas Hotel and Casino will not affect the Chesapeake Bay. He can testify that Dr. Morgan Foster has in fact been studying agricultural to industrial pollution levels, which do not apply to this case. Dr. Bailey Nadeau has over 50 articles about water pollution levels. Our final witness will be Addison Randall. Addison Randall is the