ipl-logo

Power And Corruption In Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar'

1028 Words5 Pages

Lily Bell
Mrs. Wood
English II
18 January 2023
Power and Corruption In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare multiple characters gain power which eventually ends up in corruption and even death. Characters such as Caesar and Brutus both used their power in evil ways. With too much power, one can make terribly awful events happen. In Caesar and Brutus’s cases, their power was the sole cause of the terrible affairs. However, in Mark Antony’s case, he gained power and used it to create peace and bring justice to Caesar. Regardless of this circumstance, Caesar and Brutus’s usage of power in the play is not dismissed. More times than not, when one gains an excessive amount of power they will use it for evil and cause corruption. …show more content…

Shortly after Caesar gained his victory, there was a celebration held in the streets of Rome. Two senators, Flavius and Marullus, were not particularly pleased by this. They decided to take down some of the celebratory decor. In return, Caesar had them killed. We learned this when Casca, who later in the play is the first to stab Caesar, states, “Marullus and Flavius, for pulling down scarfs off of Caesar's images, are put to silence” (I.ii.78). This shows just how much power Caesar has. All that Flavius and Marullus did was take down some decorations and in return they were ordered to be killed by Caesar. From this you can see how much power Caesar truly has. If he didn’t occupy as much power as he did, both Flavius and Marullus would not be dead. When one has so much power they can cause an immense amount of corruption. Flavius and Marullus didn’t maintain much power so what they did didn’t result in corruption. If they were to have had as much power as Caesar then possibly conditions would have been different. Instead of using what little power they possess to destroy Caesar's image, they could have taken it as far as to kill Caesar just like what he did to them. It is obvious that once power is gained that the chances of corruption occurring are much higher. If it were not for power these corrupted circumstances would not have been able to take …show more content…

After Caesar was killed, Mark Antony knew Caesar did not deserve to be killed, he deserved justice. Mark Antony proceeded to use the power he had to persuade the crowd of people to bring justice to Caesar. At one point in Antony’s speech he stated, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar and I must pause till it comes back to me” (III.ii.103). Mark Antony speaks from his heart. He uses his power to speak in front of the crowd and show them that Caesar deserved peace and justice. Most times when power is gained it is more likely to lead to evil or corrupted outcomes. Mark Antony however used his power in a way not commonly seen in the play. Unlike Caesar and Brutus, Mark Antony used his power for morality instead of

Show More
Related
993 Words | 4 Pages

Oftentimes, powerful people use their power to do bad things. Firstly, Julius Caesar had help before rising to power. Caesar used his forces to remove political rivals and conquer Gaul. Julius Caesar created an alliance with Crassus and Pompey to form the First Triumvirate.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Flavis is best known for his involvement in the diadem incident with Caesar, where, before Julius Caesar’s assassination Flavis and one other man stole the Caesar’s diadem. As Caesar’s power grew over time someone put a diadem on one of his statues, marking him as a king. Flavis and Gaius Epidius Marullus removed it. Later that month, the annual festival of the Latin-speaking peoples was being celebrated, and the Senate had granted Caesar

Read More
354 Words | 2 Pages

Marissa Gill Mr. McNulty G4 Mark Antony used numerous rhetorical strategies to take control of the Plebeian crowd’s minds and lead them into a furious frenzy. In the book Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony attempted to undo the idea of an ambitious Caesar that was painted in their heads by Brutus in his previous speech. Mark Antony did this in his own speech to persuade the crowd that Caesar shouldn't have been murdered and that Brutus was deceiving them for his own gain. Antony used pathos, metaphors, and repetition to prove that Caesar was a good man who loved his people, held himself to the same standards as them, and implied that the men who killed him were not honorable.

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

Ella Burke Mrs. ODonnell 10th Honors English 9 May 2023 Julius Caesar’s Theme Corruption is one of the most pressing political concerns in America, mirroring a longstanding pattern observed in ancient societies such as Greece and Rome. Julius Caesar's assassination in 44 BC, fueled by citizens' fear of his autocracy, was chronicled by Plutarch about a century later. It was this book, Parallel Lives, that Shakespeare used as a historical reference to write Julius Caesar, which revolves around the abuse of power and how it negatively affects civilizations.

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

Antony speaks to the citizens and is able- without angering the people further, making them hate him, or dishonoring Brutus openingly- to convince them that the conspirators are in the wrong. He does this in a number of ways, all proving him to be very convincing and intelligent. Antony helps the people of Rome remember the good Caesar has done for Rome, and reminds them of how he denied the crown offered to him three times. He shows them the body of Caesar, emphasizing the holes and blood, saying, "Look, in this place ran Cassius' dagger through: See what a rent the envious Casca made: Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb'd;" Act III, Scene II of Julius Caesar.

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Corruption is defined as dishonest or illegal behavior, especially by powerful people, and just like its definition, corruption and power go hand in hand. The more power a person has, generally, the easier it is for them to be corrupted. Just like in Julius Caesar where power and corruption are very prevalent, and most of the leaders in Julius Caesar became corrupted by their power, but in some rare cases leaders have avoided corruption, these people are very valuable in society, and must not be taken for granted. Just like many other leaders in Julius Caesar, Caesar was corrupted by his power. He wasn’t corrupt in the normal sense, he was socially corrupt in the fact that he didn’t stick to the social norms of respecting fellow senators in

Read More
224 Words | 1 Pages

However, the citizens are busy celebrating the return of Julius Caesar, and the tribunes are well aware aware of this. In my opinion, Flavius and Murellus are in the wrong not because they conspired against Caesar, but that they fell short in their duty

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Politicians will do anything for power “but when [one] once attains the utmost round – [one] then unto the ladder turns his back, – Looks in the clouds, scorning the base degrees” (line 24-26). Shakespeare uses imagery to paint a picture in the minds of his audience of Caesar climbing up the ladder of social standing. Because of how high Caesar has climbed Brutus fears his corruption.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

Antony forms a triumvirate to defeat Brutus and the conspirators. Power causes feelings for revenge.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Individuals, such as Cassius and Brutus, in the senate were afraid of having their power decreased because Caesar, as Brutus states, is an “unhatched serpent’s egg” (Act 2, Scene 1, Line 33). Caesar has the potential of becoming a danger in the senate members point of view due to the fact that Caesar is gaining all the glory from the Plebeians and being compared to a god. Many of the Plebeians do not respect or think highly of the senate members as in Act 1, Scene 1 the cobbler uses puns and jokes to address Murellus and Flavius. Thus, Caesar was murdered out of fear and jealousy and not his rising power and therefore making his murder not

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

It is not possible for politics to be completely successful and moral at once, as demonstrated in Julius Caesar because humans constantly crave power, which is met with disapproval by others- leading to them carrying out immoral actions in order to stop the power from growing. Both leaders and citizens/officials fall victim to displaying immorality through their actions, which is frequently seen in Julius Caesar. This scenario applies in politics when one wants to gain power (Caesar) and rule in an unjust manner, while others (the Conspirators) want to destroy their threat of democracy (Caesar). Political leaders fail at their jobs when power is introduced, causing them to gradually disregard their citizens and focus on how they can run the

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Marc Antony appears to be a strong advocate for Julius Caesar’s triumphs and increasing power. However, like Caesar, Antony is extremely manipulative and powerful. After Caesar’s death, Antony manipulated the conspirators into believing he was on their side before requesting to speak at Caesar’s funeral. While Brutus and the conspirators remained fooled by Antony’s innocence, Antony took the initiative to inform the Roman citizens of the conspirator’s horrendous actions towards their beloved leader, Julius Caesar. Caesar’s funeral was a time of reflection for the citizens of Rome, as Marc Antony caused them to question their allegiance to Brutus.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to

Read More
1793 Words | 8 Pages

His move gives him a greater common ground with the crowd. He provides many examples to prove that Caesar wasn’t ambitious like “I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse.” Antony continues that Caesar sympathized and felt for the poor: “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept. Mark Antony manipulates the crowd so that his beliefs become theirs. Antony is ultimately the better orator because of his understanding of the

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

Flavius’s metaphor, “These growing feathers pluck 'd from Caesar 's wing will make him fly and ordinary pitch” (I.i.73-74), details the imagery of Caesar 's power and the fall of his reign. The feathers are a symbol for Caesar’s supporters and the cruel imagery of the feathers being plucked from Caesar 's wing strongly connects with betrayal. His own government was working to overthrow him. A major theme of the play, betrayal, is seen on many levels throughout the Roman government and within Caesar’s interpersonal relationships. According to the Senators the only way Caesars’ great ambition could have been stopped was by killing him.

Read More

More about Power And Corruption In Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar'

Related Topics

Open Document