President Trump’s State of the Union address discusses many of the United State’s most disputed topics, such as immigration. Though the address possesses its supporters, it also contains critics. The Washington Examiner titles its headline, “Trump won on immigration...the media ignored it” by Eddie Scarry, a supporter of President Trump’s State of the Union address. This article first discusses how President Trump communicates a story of a family who lost their two daughters because an illegal immigrant murdered them. By providing this example in President Trump’s address, Scarry builds up pathos and ethos in his argument. Pathos builds up in his argument because parents who read this article and his reasoning will reflect this situation onto their own family. Scarry also establishes ethos because this example provides evidence to his argument as to why the government needs to enforce stricter immigration laws. …show more content…
Gerson writes “The lavish use of everyday heroes was welcome relief from Trump’s relentless narcissism.” This statement name calls President Trump, which applies to the lowest form of argument. He then presents an ad hominem against President Trump, writing, “This demonstrates a reckless ignorance of economics and demography.” Gerson attacks President Trump’s authority with no