The United States just elected a new president recently. This is a major event, because this is a country that values the citizens right to vote above many other rights and privileges. The months and weeks leading up to the election were very divisive and showed how humans have a long way to go before reaching a peaceful resolution of
In my own words some of the pros and cons of the Electoral College are as followed and explained. My pros are that it maintains the federalist system, and allows for minority interests to be represented. It helps maintain the federalist system by keeping all of the branches of government equal. It helps allow for minority interests to be represented by helping the interest and have the ability to be represented and backed up by bigger parties to help get votes. My cons of the Electoral College are that is does not reflect the popular vote, and lowers voter turnout.
Our country has had quite a few Presidents in its day and with that come the good and the bad. Now, not all Presidents are either purely good or bad. There are some that mostly bad with a bit of good while others can be mostly good with a hint of bad. Now, no man is perfect by any means but there are a few Presidents that have done fantastic while in office and that have been a purely beneficial factor for our country.
The electoral college is a way for selected individual’s to be chosen from each state to vote for the two-presidential candidate’s that have won popular vote for that state. Each state gets two votes for each senator and an additional vote for each member of the House of Representatives, which is based on state population. When votes are accumulated the candidate must get at least 270 votes from the Electoral College system. ( Levin- Waldman, 2012) There are some pros which are the electoral college system is efficient way to represent the country’s overall votes, favors states with smaller populations, this avoids them from having to recount the nations popular vote.
Nathan Palm Mr. Baker American Government Electoral College or Not In the 1787 Constitutional Convention, one of the hardest questions to resolve was how to elect the president. (Roos) The Founding Fathers debated for months and came up with the compromise known as the Electoral College. Alternatives such as Congress picking the president and a democratic popular vote were discussed, but the electoral college was the method agreed upon by the Founding Fathers.
The United States of America has a rich history filled with success, failure, courage, and drive. Millions have come seeking the “American Dream” and to live in the land of the free. The past is what has shaped this nation’s present and future. Yet, as time drifts, the world around us changes. What was once deemed acceptable can now seem outdated in today’s society.
Recently, especially after the 2000 elections where Al Gore won in the popular vote with 500,000 more votes but lost the electoral vote to George W. Bush, has the public began really arguing if the Electoral College should continue to be the major deciding factor in elections. “The Electoral College, the assemblage of state electors constitutionally charged with electing the president, also limits third-party growth. With the exceptions of Maine and Nebraska, states award all their votes to the plurality winner within the state,(a term commonly referred as winner-take-all)” (AM GOV). Each state receives an electoral vote for every member they have in the Senate and House of Representatives.
Ever since the election involving Bush and Gore, the viability of the Electoral College has become a heatedly debated topic. The question is whether the Electoral College is still an effective system considering the conditions the United States faces today as opposed to the conditions that the Founding Fathers faced when they created it. For over one hundred and fifty years, the United States has used this system, and controversy has followed it ever since. It was created in an effort to protect the people and institution of America by putting the final vote of the presidency in the hands of a trusted and respected few. These few have the power to disregard the popular vote due to the fact that there is still no federal law demanding electors
In the constitutional convention of 1787, our nation's founding fathers came together to come up with a method to elect a president at a time when the majority of Americans couldn’t make an educated decision when voting so Electors who trusted with the responsibility to represent their state and make an informed choice. Our founding fathers came up with an indirect method, the Electoral College, which proved successful by allowing Americans to choose their state representatives and senators who would represent their vote and through a majority choose a president-elect. Through the electoral college, each state gets two senators and a varied number of state representatives depending on the population of their state that the people vote for themselves
Even after the signing of the 1965 voting rights act, which was intended to help African Americans and other racial minorities to have the constitutional right to vote, some laws still in the books throughout the United States discriminate against those who are not property owners. Of course, to be fair, this is exclusively certain election. But could this have a psychological effect on the non-property owners and depress turnout for other types of election in which virtually everyone above the age of eighteen could vote? In a district election, some officials are appointed, some are elected by property owners only and others are elected by everyone in the district. Roughly 40% of such district throughout the United States of America have
Nicholas Hom Baker 1A Government 1 March 2023 Electoral College There are many ways to elect a United States President from a random selection to a popular vote. The topic on how the United States should elect a president has been in debate for quite some time.
The electoral college - how can it be good? In a fair democracy everyone's vote should be counted equally, however the way that the United States elects its President violates this right by making sure some people have more voting power than others. The Electoral college is in fact the 538 votes that determines who wins the presidency.
An Undated Practice: The Electoral College Founded at a time of great uncertainty, in a struggle between state and federal power, the electoral college was created as a means to compromise. Intricate and complex, this system is discriminatory to each individual of the population; most Americans are oblivious to this fact. In addition, candidates may win their election without winning the popular vote. After the votes have been cast, loyal electors may betray the people whom they represent and select the unpopular candidate.
The Electoral College The Electoral College is the current process in which the United States decides who will win the presidential election. This method was adopted in 1787, taking the structure from the Roman Republic. Throughout the time we have used this method it has gone through two redesigns, the second of which resulted in the making of the Twelfth Amendment. In the following, I will be answering, how does the Electoral College operate, do I believe in it and should we change it to a popular vote?
The struggle that is caused by pride and confidence is one that is experienced by all, for it is natural, but letting it control oneself can be dangerous. This is also true for Fortunato, a character in Edgar Allan Poe’s short story, “The Cask of Amontillado”, and the narrator from James Hurst’s short story, “The Scarlet Ibis”. In “The Cask of Amontillado”, the main character, Montresor, feels that he has been wronged by one of his old friends, Fortunato. Montresor feels that he must exact revenge on Fortunato for these wrongs to be made right, later proceeding to lead Fortunato deep into the catacombs. Along the way, Fortunato is given many signs that something is wrong, but his pride makes him oblivious to those warnings.
