Accordingly of accord with the above mentioned complainant declared a prima facie case 0f Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation on the basis of national origin when he shows the elements that apply such as: 1.- the Complainant's national origin “ Hispanic”. 2.- The complainant is otherwise qualifies for the benefits in question“ legally enrolled in the Tyler Junior College”. 3.-The entity “ Tyler Junior College” receive FFA and; 4.- The entity “Tyler Junior College” alleged to have discriminated and retaliated to complainant through of the Writing Lab's teacher-tutors in the Tyler Junior College's Police Station, and Smith County Police Station; when this agencies was lacking of jurisdiction in educative matters. Likewise when denied …show more content…
Moreover the complainant was unlawful arrested and addressed to the Immigration Program “ Secure Community” for 48 hours. Disparate treatment analysis: The assumptions made by the staff of Arts Faculty based in the sensitive information deposited by the complainant in the Tyler Junior College' record office was the national origin – migratory legal status when the record shows to an undocumented student without student's visa. Such assumptions impacted staff's educative decisions when did not attend the complaint' s claims, denied the educative accessories services that offers the Arts Faculty's Writing Lab, and retaliated with the Police Station in December, 2010 , January 2011 and May 2013. Disparate Impact analysis: The Intern regulations of the Tyler Junior College about discrimination did not rule special circumstances as the conduct of a teacher that sometimes is working as tutor, who wait a semester to make a retaliatory act to push out the college to the complainant. When harassed to student with the Tyler Junior College's safety police, Tyelr Junior College's Police Station affected the professor's class