Prince Hal In Henry Iv Part 1

It is often said that the downfall of a man is tied to the vastness of his ego. In William Shakespeare’s Henry IV Part 1, it is evident that a character’s values can be uncovered through a psychoanalytical lens. This can be seen through the individuality and actions of the characters. Ultimately, the contrast between Prince Hal and Hotspur’s superegos reflects their moral standards and ideals.
First, the contrast between Prince Hal and Hotspur’s superegos reflects their moral standards which can be displayed through the individuality of the characters. It is evident that both Hal and Hotspur have unique traits that can either help or hinder their growth as a character. Throughout the play it is apparent that Prince Hal is detached from his

He says: “What, old acquaintance, could not all this flesh/ Keep in a little life? Poor Jack, farewell! / I could have better spared a better man. / O, I should have a heavy miss of thee/ If I were much in love with vanity” (5.4.101-105). In this quotation, Hal presumes that Falstaff has been killed while at battle. His deep affection for Falstaff can be seen as he says that he would have rather lost a more valuable soldier than him. In addition, Prince Hal’s character can be highlighted through his foolish nature which is unusual for a figure of royalty. Hal’s foolish nature can be displayed through his relationship with his father. King Henry is unimpressed with his son and does not approve of his reckless behaviour. He says, “Whilst I, by looking on the praise of him, / see riot and dishonor stain the brow/ of my young Harry” (1.1.84-86). In this quotation King Henry describes his son as a dishonourable prince who does not abide by the values of royalty. Ultimately, though the tense relationship between Hal and King Henry, Hal is forced to seek further support from his friends from the