ipl-logo

Private Nuisance Case Study

1621 Words7 Pages

Introduction
In this case, we are going to identify more than one legal issues, we have; private nuisance, public nuisance, negligence, tresspass, and duty of care. We are going to talk about each one individually, firstly, we would identify the issue, state the rule of law with its different sources and relating to its facts, apply the law and explain, conlude with the outcomes.

The first issue we have is a private nuisance between Geoffery and he’s neighbour Mavis. A guilty person, who does any act, that makes him guilty of an unlawful omission, which happens to be an illegal interference with your neighbour’s use or enjoyment of land, that is what private nuisance is. Hunter v Canary wharf , private nuisance is well known of its three …show more content…

In this scenario, we had a lot of issues, starting with Geoffrey’s rabbit’s noise that’s disturbing the nun, Mavis, which led to a private nuisance. Leeman v Montague ,1936. However, if the court decided that the defendant’s use of land was reasonable, then the nuisance will fail the claim, Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather [1994].

Next were Geoffrey’s negligence, which led to Tom’s injury; the court will look if the defendant (Geoffrey) did it intentionally or unintentionally. If Geoffrey injured tom intentionally, then he will be prosecuted in assault and battery, which is a trespass to the person. “A battery is, angrily touching the other person”. – Holt C.J in Cole v.Turner 1704 . Nevertheless, if it was unintentionally, the court will take he’s cause of action as negligence, and not as trespass.

Likewise, the negligence of the electric supply caused tom’s heart to stop. The court will look that tom suffered a serious damage that was suffered by him and not other citizen, and could result to his death. Therefore, Tom can take a cause of action in public nuisance and negligence of the electrical supply company. Boyd v great northern railway

Show More
Related

Rampart Security Case Study

838 Words | 4 Pages

“The defendant is liable only if the product is defective when it leaves his hands. There must be something wrong with the goods. If they are reasonably safe and the buyer’s mishandling of the goods causes the harm, there is no

Read More

Case Study: Welge V. Planter's Lifesavers

517 Words | 3 Pages

While Mrs. Mabee carried the jugs from the front door toward the back of the house, one of the jugs shattered and spilled on her body and on the dining room floor and furniture, causing severe damage. 2 & 3 -The Product was so defective that the product was unreasonably dangerous and cause the plaintiff’s injury. It was evident the product was defective since as soon the jugs were handed over to Mrs. Mabee by the delivery driver, the jugs shattered causing injury instantly. Jeanny

Read More

Norton V. Black, 469 C. Id

465 Words | 2 Pages

To be a considered a natural condition, it must remain its natural state—despite the movement or relocation. Norton v. Black, 469 P.2D 102. For example, in Norton, a young boy was injured while playing on a hedge that was planted by property owners. Id. 102. The court held that the hedge was natural.

Read More

Adam Futrell Case

301 Words | 2 Pages

Everyday someone is injured because of someone else’s carelessness. Adam Futrell brings his extensive knowledge of injury law to fight for each of his clients. From one of the South’s most respected law firms, to the Attorney General’s Office,

Read More

Intentional Tort: Court Case Study

556 Words | 3 Pages

In his complaint, which tort theory is Julian’s attorney most likely to allege and what will he have to prove for Julian to be successful? 
Julian’s attorney is most likely to allege that mike reacted in a negligent matter in his complaint. As people it is our duty to act reasonably. A reasonable person would not have picked up Julian after witnessing him take a kick to the head. A reasonable person should not move a person who has received a kick to the head.

Read More

How Did Dave Violated The Law Under Section 352

1452 Words | 6 Pages

Dave had violated the law under Section 352 of the Penal Code when he assaults May by banging on the door and shouting at the top of his voice threatening May to watch out once he got hold of May. When the lock gave way, May was afraid that Dave could harm her as Dave is an Australian six foot tall guy, therefore she jumped out of the window and broke her ankle. Under the section 352 of the penal code, it also says that unless the defendant actions are caused by grave and sudden provocation, he shall be punished with a fine or a jail term or both. In Dave’s case, there is no grave and sudden provocation in my opinion as he has the time to follow May upstairs. Similar to R v Roberts (1971), the court held that the defendant’s actions were foreseeable

Read More

What Is The Case Of Baig V Liz Case Brief

901 Words | 4 Pages

The case of Baig v Harvie 2016 SLT 67; 2016 SCL 108 is an appeal case for behaving in a threatening or abusive manner in relation to the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 s.38(1) , the appeal was refused as the sheriff had been entitled on the findings in fact that the statutory requirements for the offence had been met. A. The Facts– Mr Baig appealed stated case against conviction for behaving in a threatening or abusive manner, contrary to the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 s.38(1). Mr Baig along with his brother (C) had an altercation with two parking attendants (P) after P had issued Mr Baig with a penalty charge notice, B then approached P, had been aggressive, confrontational and verbally abusive and had then proceeded to follow them as

Read More

Summary Of A Red Light For Difflaws By Frank Trippett

477 Words | 2 Pages

Frank Trippett, in his passage “A Red Light For Scofflaws”, is arguing that the people are not following the minor laws because they think it is not important, he support his argument by first explaining how the people are breaking laws and not even thought that it was wrong, he continues by showing how the careless of the people could threaten the people’s lives. The author wrote in critical tone for the Americans who are breaking the minor laws. The author’s argument is right, people should take the minor laws more seriously because people could lose their lives and make other people life in dangerous too. The people do not think that these laws are important, and they are not that big deal because it will not make any different and will not effect anyone, for example, if the government decide to change the speeding in certain area and make it lower, some people will think that this is wrong because they got used to a certain system and they do not want to change it.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Felony Murder

949 Words | 4 Pages

For battery there must have been the actual act and intent is not necessarily a requirement. A negligent or illegal act may be enough. For assault it is required that an actual deliberate threat was made to cause fear on the victim, and there was an attempt to commit battery.

Read More

A Red Light For Scofflaws Summary

570 Words | 3 Pages

Americans in our world today believe that “ minor” laws do not mean anything, but it is the “minor” laws that lead you to be a real criminal or lawbreaker. Frank Trippett argues in his passage, A Red Light for Scofflaws, that scofflaws should be stopped and be shown that a minor law is just as important as a violent crime. The author supports his argument by giving reasoning why people would think minor laws are not a huge deal. The author’s purpose is to show the reader that any laws against littering, speeding, or noise pollution should be serious and not treated by scofflaws. The author creates an objective tone for the people who are interested in any law-and-order.

Read More

Earl Faison Case

476 Words | 2 Pages

If injury is caused or threats are made with a weapon of

Read More

Steinberg Harboring A Dog

248 Words | 1 Pages

The court concluded since he was not harboring the animal he is not an owner at the time of the injury. Id. at 1267. Similarly in Severson, the court held that under the Animal Control

Read More

Harris V. Jones Analysis

649 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, in the fifth count of her complaint, Ellina states a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). “[T]o impose liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress: (1) The conduct must be intentional or reckless; (2) The conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (3) There must be a causal connection between the wrongful conduct and the emotional distress; (4) The emotional distress must be severe.” Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560, 566 (1977). Critically, the intent requirement of the tort requires the tortfeasor to have acted intentionally or recklessly. Indeed, in her complaint, Ellina alleges that Gil “intentionally and/or recklessly engaged in conduct . . .”

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Humanistic Approach To The Study Of Law

1163 Words | 5 Pages

As the law have definite rules and abstracts, the application of such rules and structure can be ineffectively applied which requires the ultimate result to reach. In addition, such structures are difficult to be applied in every situation and thus, it is important to understand the situation and the means of structure where it can provide the complete solution to the problem. It also involves the articulation of complex facts which are also tricky to understand. Advantages – it provides the understanding to view the person as an active agent and also promotes the idea of self-responsibility. The humanistic approach also enables the professional to work on the subjective experiences of an individual.

Read More

Environmental Law In India

1918 Words | 8 Pages

In this case, Shriram Industries was allowed to operate in a designated air pollution control area. Oleum Gas leaked accidentally from the factory. Though the company was in compliance with the limits permissible air pollution laws at that time, the Supreme Court of India slapped the company with liability for the accidental leakage of gas. Hence, Courts of India uphold the “polluter pays principle” for damages caused on account of polluting activities whereby the polluting parties have to pay out civil liabilities for environmental

Read More

More about Private Nuisance Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document