Abortion is a highly debated and sensitive topic, which has been a subject of diverse opinions. It comes with complex moral, ethical, and legal implications, with various perspectives examining the arguments of Pro–choice and Pro–life, which can cause strong emotions. The Pro–choice perspective supports the fact that women should have the right to make decisions about their bodies, including abortion. On the other hand, the Pro–life perspective supports the protection of the unborn fetus, and it considers abortion as unethical. While the Pro-choice and Pro–life perspectives have different opinions about abortion, there are a few points of mutual agreement, such as the agreement on reducing the number of unintended pregnancies and how it is …show more content…
Perspectives, Lesson 1) In the context of abortion, automatic thinking can make individuals rely on preconceived notions, biases and stereotypes about the other side. For instance, if the Pro–choice perspective sees the Pro–life position as anti–women rights and the Pro–life sees the Pro–choice as promoting the destruction of innocent life, that will not lead to a constructive dialogue. To improve dialogue between both sides, there is a need to recognize and challenge the automatic patterns, which can help individuals become aware of their biases and assumptions to improve dialogue between both sides. If that happens, it might lead to a more open–minded and empathetic dialogue so that they can understand the other's motivations, values, and concerns. Secondly, controlled thinking is reflective thinking, which involves a conscious, analytical process that allows individuals to consider different perspectives and make reasoned decisions. Perspectives, Lesson 1) With the engagement of controlled thinking, both sides can identify areas of common ground and discuss areas in which they share different values, so it is possible to explore ethical and social issues related to women's health, the sanctity of life, and reproductive