ipl-logo

Pro Slavery Argumentative Argument

1352 Words6 Pages

American History Argumentative Paper Slavery is a disease that a plagued several people in the South and in the North. The America. Because African Americans were not even seen as people, it drove the white man to justify actions done against a people. Slavery brought out the worst side of human capability, while rendering African Americans completely helpless. However, there are more sides to this ugly reality living in the United States that resulted in both the betterment and the hindrance of equality in this country.
One of the most typical people to own slaves was the white well-to-do pro-slavery Southerner. The white well-to-do Southerner had every reason in his mind to keep practicing slavery. Slavery was an ill that multiple men …show more content…

However, the goals and the motives for abolitionists varied greatly. Common belief is that all abolitionists wanted freedom for the slaves because they sought equality between blacks and whites in America. However, it was quite the contrary. There were some abolitionists who craved equality for blacks and whites in America, but there were others who still thought that blacks were less than whites. On the other hand, there were some African American abolitionists who demanded their freedom and did their best to speak out so that their voice would be heard against a nation who accepted the ill of slavery. An example of an abolitionist in the North is William Lloyd Garrison. Garrison was a Northerner who was against slavery (civilwar.org). Garrison’s followers wanted to free the slaves because it was also a violation of the what is plainly right and wrong for America. In the Garrison’s opinion, slavery was immoral and was not right(teachushistory.org). There was more than one side to slavery, however. Other people against slavery took the stand against slavery because it violated their views as far as politics are concerned (teachushistory.com). These people were called political abolitionists. Political abolitionists thought it best to select an anti-slavery candidate to ensure that freedom for slaves would happen immediately (teachushistory.com). So, for various reasons, people took …show more content…

In the South, the white Southerners began to feel threatened because of the increasing number of slaves, or African Americans in that region (civilwar.org). Thus, the poor whites took the side of many other whites. The justification for many whites was that slavery was essential because of the dependence on it for the economy (socialstudieshelp.com). Many white people chose to live blindly. In other words, many white people believed that nothing was wrong with slavery because they believed that the slaves were content with being enslaved (socialstudieshelp.com). Notice that whites who made this assumption never took the time to observe or ask the slaves how they felt about being enslaved with virtually no rights, and no sense of freedom. Furthermore, slaves were viewed as being beneath or less than whites. In many cases, slaves were not even seen as human beings, but as animals (socialstudieshelp.org). The labor African Americans did was brutal, and the work blacks did was likened to the work people commonly did in factories (socialstudieshelp.org). White southerners wanted to keep slavery, because after all, African Americans were not considered

More about Pro Slavery Argumentative Argument

Open Document