The Secret History has much to say in regards to the rule of Justinian and Theodora and without a doubt in that lays much truth and certainty. That Justinian separated his pundits is unchallenged; regardless of whether he was fruitful or not as an Emperor is exceedingly discussed. What can 't be denied is that Theodora was clearly a savvy woman who rose to the rank of Empress in spite of her flawed past, and whom more likely than not been acknowledged by quite a bit of Byzantine society (Procopius). Procopius character death in The Secret History does much to debilitate his contention, yet lamentably, it is this picture of her, as an immoral prostitute who utilized her wiles to lure and at last manage through Justinian, that has won. In that in any event, Procopius …show more content…
All facts reveal that Procopius in The Secret History faulted many of Justinian 's deficiencies, similar to the case with Belisarius, on his marriage to an immoral woman. Rather than portraying Justinian as a detestable virtuoso, Procopius kept up that the emperor was a straightforward man: without any sense than a jackass, prepared to tail any individual who pulls his reins. According to Procopius, Justinian wedded Theodora on the grounds that he was overcome by a staggering enthusiasm for her. Procopius utilized the union for instance to show how far Justinian had strayed from Roman customs. Indeed, even Justinian 's close relative, the empress Euphemia, whom Procopius saw as totally without culture, and of savage cause, declined to acknowledge the marriage while she lived (Procopius). So for Procopius, the way that a non-Roman would have more regard for Roman customs than its emperor indicated exactly how far Justinian 's desire for Theodora had shielded him from paying special mind to the requirements of the Empire. It seems that Procopius utilized his harangue against Theodora in Secret History not such a great amount to attack the empress, but rather as a way to stigmatize his actual target,