ipl-logo

Professor Watchlist Is Share As Threat To Academic Freedom Summary

453 Words2 Pages

In the movie “God’s not Dead”, a professor was being unfair and threatened a student named Josh Wheaton that if he believed in God he will fail his class. Josh stood strong and defended his right to believe in what he wants, in which he speaks in front of the class and tells the professor, “The only difference between my position and yours is that you take away their option to believe”. Not only did Josh stand up for himself but for the entire class. He believed that it was wrong for the professor to limit the students from their beliefs as well taking away their right to express their religion. In the articles, “Professor Watchlist Is Share as Threat to Academic Freedom” by Christopher Mele and “I Am a Dangerous Professor”, share the same idea on how some professors or teachers limit the opinion for students, take away the right of their freedom of speech and some cases discriminate. …show more content…

In this site, several college professors are being wrongfully accused and targeted by anonymous students. In addition, professors are labeled and pointed out to the point where a professor, Julio C. Pino, from Kent State University in Ohio is “facing an investigation by the FBI for connections to ISIS.” (Professor Watchlist Is…). Furthermore, in the article “I Am a Dangerous Professor”, the author, George Yancy, demonstrates how the “Watchlist” has affected his career and expresses his views towards this

Show More
Related
84 Words | 1 Pages

In the “Bethel School District v. Fraser” case, Fraser believed that the school violated his first amendment “freedom of speech” rights. Fraser gave a speech with some inappropriate content in it and the school gave him a three day suspension because two teachers warned him before he gave the speech. Fraser took it to court and the justices said they would shorten the suspension and let him have his right to speak at graduation because the school was taking away his freedom of speech.

Read More
1331 Words | 6 Pages

“By the mid nineties, the issue couldn’t exclude religious speakers from the list” The new look of religious cases allowed for people to go against the law of religious freedom. - pg 113 “But the stat denied a request heightened the differences between them.” The law of freedom of speech works for many terrible groups of people, making them question if they are actually doing the right thing. Support:

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

The First Amendment rights of Alex were violated because the school went against his belief of religion and did not allow him to express it. The school administrator tampered with Alex’s First Amendment rights. Quoting from the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

I visited my Foundations of Terrorism teacher Francis Boateng. Mr. Francis is from Ghana and he received his associates as well as bachelor’s degree in criminal justice there. He went on to get his masters and Ph.D at Washington State University where he was a teaching assistant for five years. He has been teaching for a total of seven years, five of which were at Washington State University and another two years as an assistant professor at Minnesota State. Mr. Boateng came to Ole Miss in order to advance his career.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Author and First Amendment Lawyer Greg Lukianoff, in his book, Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship The End of American Debate, explores deeply into some of the most compelling college and university controversies in which freedom of speech, a right every person in the United States has, is taken away. The author mentions the way students, through debate, become less aware on what their rights are in terms of defending themselves from harsh administrative rule. Author Lukianoff explicitly states his point that what is currently happening to students in modern educational institutions is affecting and will affect them badly later down the road. The author made several arguments that completely made me agree with him.

Read More
1654 Words | 7 Pages

For instance, the Supreme Court of Canada considered when to recognize a particular practice as a religious requirement. The decision then dealt with the appropriate method for accommodating religious practice in a multicultural society. The school board argued that it had to protect the safety of the rest of the students for the sake of infringing on one students rights. However, this court case provided importance, pointed to a minimum constitutional protection for freedom of religion that must be taken into account by the legislature and by administrative tribunals. In addition, safety concerns must be established for the infringement of a constitutional right to be justified.

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

One of the issues that is important is the fact that the academics fear their job and the education of their students because they’re afraid they’re going to offend someone. The authors state this by giving an exact quote from an educator. “I am a Liberal Professor, and my Liberal students terrify me.” (Lukianoff & Haidt, 2015, p.44) The authors also talk about how they fear the education of the students because of this.

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

In Derek Bok’s, Protecting Freedom of Expression On The Campus, he brings light to the issue of censorship in universities. He states that students at Harvard University got offended after a few students displayed the confederate flag. There have been many cases in which people have tried to censor offensive material however; the Supreme Court preferred to conserve the freedom of expression. He believes that if censorship starts to take place, it will be difficult to know when to cross the line. In addition, it will not fix the initial problem since the offenders will continue to abuse others using different means.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

One must have evidence that a disturbance has been make. Fear cannot take away freedom. In one of the court cases mentioned, it says, “the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools,” (13). This is saying that our constitutional freedoms are most valuable in American school communities. The freedom of expression is one of the reasons that makes America a superior country.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Trigger Warnings on College Campuses Rhetorical Analysis Writers Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, in their article “The Coddling of the American Mind”, detail the effects that safe spaces and trigger warnings are having on college campuses. They claim that “in the name of emotional well-being, college students are increasingly demanding protection from words and ideas they don’t like” and add they will explain “why that’s disastrous for education and mental health”. Through the use of the word “increasingly”, the writers recognize that not all students are following the damaging trend, but instead it is becoming progressively prevalent and as a result needs to be addressed. Throughout the article, explanations are given for the stance against shielding students from opinions they find oppressive, as well as ways to combat and fix the problem. Through this, the writers hope to promote a college experience where students can feel safe and

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Professors are required to protect the feelings and emotions of their students, “protecting them various types of unforeseen offences.” (6) Trigger warnings can useful in creating student engagement and they also allow the professor to demonstrate control of the students. By making sure students are notified and aware of controversial material, it can create the boundaries of the classroom to let students know what they are learning, whether they have any issues, and to prevent instructors from getting any sort of negative feedback. I strongly believe that the article provides extreme examples that paint an absolutely horrible picture of American millennials. The tragic events like the 1999 Columbine massacre caused public institutions to “dramatically increase security procedures.”

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history, the suppression of facts and unpopular opinions has led to nothing but conflicts and frustration. This was recently evinced in author Greg Lukianoff's book, Campus Censorship,: "As you censor unpopular opinions you end up with classroom environments where individuals can't really speak their minds. You also end up with students mostly talking to people they already agree with. The research on this is very strong--when you talk to people you already agree with, it thwarts development of critical thinking skills, and it makes people much more confident in what they already believe. It tends to make people more adamant, and exacerbates the serious problem of groupthink" ( Lukianoff 1).

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

Vindictive protectiveness is stopping students from learning anything in the four years or more that they spend in college. If they aren’t allowed to speak their mind there is no room for growth. The only thing they are learning is that speech should be under strict control by authorities. Thus teaching them that there really is no freedom of speech under the first

Read More
1795 Words | 8 Pages

This part of the book focuses on when Jassim kills a teenage boy in a terrible accident and Salwa becomes hopelessly entangled with a shadowy young American, their tenuous lives in exile and their fragile marriage begin to unravel. Once in a Promised Land is a dramatic and achingly honest look at what it means to straddle cultures, to be viewed with suspicion, and to struggle to find safe haven. America has traditionally been referred to as a "melting pot," welcoming people from many different countries, races, and religions, and cultures, all hoping to find freedom, new opportunities, and a better way of life. The text is full of intertextuality, dialogism and interculturality , since its events take place in this homogeneous society.

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

The idea of free speech on college campuses and the complications of it stem from those on campuses expressing views that don’t align with popular views. Implications for students who use the idea of free speech as a method for hateful actions and comments should be reprimanded, but the question remains as to whether schools should enforce tougher limitations. The freedom of speech on college campus expands to the freedoms of religion, assembly, press, and protest as well. Freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views. Removing freedoms of speech and expression have consequences deeper than surface issues.

Read More

More about Professor Watchlist Is Share As Threat To Academic Freedom Summary

Related Topics

Open Document