ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Airtastic

2736 Words11 Pages

A. Advise Airtastic about the legal options that are open to it to halt the actions of the protestors. Describe the legal consequences that are likely to follow if the local protestors continued to engage in their destructive actions. (40 MARKS- Your answer should be 1,000-1,200 words for this part) Introduction In this answer I intend to focus on the legal options available to Airtastic to restrict the protestors from obstructing the construction of the wind farm. I will outline the procedures Airtastic must follow if they intend to proceed with these legal options. I will also outline the legal consequences that will incur if the protestors persist in their actions. Legal Options Airtastic has many legal options available to halt the actions …show more content…

A decision of an administrative body may be set aside on the basis that it is irrational or possibly disproportionate. Conventional judicial review procedure is governed by Order 84 of the Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 to 2011, which includes amendments made by SI 691 0f 2011: Rules of the Superior Court (Judicial Review) 2011. The first step in the judicial review procedure involves the mandatory “leave stage”. At this stage an application for leave to bring judicial review proceedings must first be made. The leave stage filters out, at an early stage, claims which may invalid or unsubstantial. At the leave stage Save our Birds must show that they have "sufficient interest" in the matter. In other words, they must demonstrate how the surrounding environment and wildlife are affected by the decision they wish to contest. An arguable case must be illustrated, indicating clearly their case has grounds and a reasonable chance of …show more content…

This legislation ultimately takes the power away from the high court which causes concern for the president as it appears to be unconstitutional. Firstly, the president may have concerns regarding how constitutional it is to take this issue away from the high court. According to Article 34 of the 1937 Constitution, the high court should have the power to determine whether a proposed law is valid with regard to the constitution. ° Save as otherwise provided by this Article, the jurisdiction of the High Court shall extend to the question of the validity of any law having regard to the provisions of this Constitution, and no such question shall be raised (whether by pleading, argument or otherwise) in any Court established under this or any other Article of this Constitution other than the High Court or the Supreme Court. The High Court has the jurisdiction to determine whether or not a law conflicts with the Constitution. In this case, if the proposed legislation is passed, the high court will no longer have this power. They won’t be able to decide whether or not the planning permission should be granted. By taking this power away from the High Court, it may be considered unconstitutional as the protestors cannot continue with the judicial review

Show More
Related
955 Words | 4 Pages

The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

Read More
145 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court case of Engel v. Vitale’s decision was based on the establishment clause. The case of Engel v. Vitale struck down state organized prayer in school. The prayer had government endorsement and was thus considered unconstitutional. The Supreme Court case of Oregon v. Smith used the free exercise clause the basis of their decision.

Read More
1795 Words | 8 Pages

The following analyses the different roles and duties performed during the trial of issues on 17 August. This report also comments on the proceedings and a potential reason of appeal. The sentencing of this case is still to be decided and is currently scheduled for 14 October

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Whitney v. California Tylisia Crews September 22, 2015 Facts The parties of the Whitney v. California case was against petitioner Charlotte Anita Whitney and respondent, the state of California’s Criminal Syndicalism Act of California. It was argued on October 6th, 1925 and was decided on May 16th, 1927. The state of California filed a lawsuit against Whitney when they found out she was accused of helping begin the Communist Labor Party of America, a party that advocated violence to get a political change. Whitney was found guilty even though the constitution was the defendant’s defense.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

In doing so, he ties the claim and evidence together, and, logically advances his argument. Davidson provides the clarity and the clarity leads the reader to conclude that the benefits of his argument outweigh potential

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

To begin with, in the judicial system, there is an ongoing dispute over what compromises the proper amount of judicial power. This lack of agreement concerning policymaking power of the Courts is bestowed within the discussion between judicial activism and judicial restraint. In general, these two philosophies represent the conflicting approaches taken by judges in their task of interpretation. Consequently, the Court’s decision could be framed in terms of activism or restraint by either changing or upholding public policy.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Article 3 of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to review cases and declare a verdict. However, the Supreme Court is only allowed to make a decision regarding a case if and only it is brought to them. In other words, only cases that has been passed through the lower courts and has made its way up into the Supreme Court is the Supreme Court allowed to make a decision. From the founding of the constitution, many cases have made its way up the courts and into the Supreme Court where the Justices deliver the final verdict. Cases similar to that of Nixon vs. United States challenged the federal power of the President.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

Since the establishment of the United States Supreme Court in 1789 the role and function of the court has varied depending on the need of the country. There are several different schools of thought when it comes to the purpose and the function that the Supreme Court should take, ranging from strictly ruling on constitutional matters up to weighing in on national policy cases. To evaluate what role the court actually takes, one must examine both the institutional function as well as the political function. Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 78 has been considered one of the most influential pieces of work in the field, as it lays the ground work of what he believed was the role of the court.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Ultimately, the judicial branch has to go back to what the founding fathers intended for the court’s purpose and to use the power accordingly. To maintain the strength of the branch, the courts must think about what is constitutionally right. Their decisions should reflect the amendments as well. “Judicial power plays an important role in the rule of law, even while it comes frequently into tension with norms of democratic rule” (Friedman & Delaney, 2011, p. 57, para. 1). This is the only way that citizens will feel like their rights are truly protected.

Read More
169 Words | 1 Pages

Since the stakes are so high in these cases, there is a high burden of proof on the prosecution. The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” - Martin Luther King, Jr. It’s truly sad how ignorance is the main thing driving this inequality that blacks have to face. In one of your most famous speeches, “I Have a Dream” I realized that you addressed many important issues. One being that people still look at African Americans as lost causes.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Issue 6- Does the Act violate the Procedural Due Process? Conclusion 1.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

Does the Supreme Court Have Too Much Power? Article Three, Section One of the Constitution states that “The judical power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”. Throughout the years, the Supreme Court has evolved significantly. According to the United States Courts, the Surpeme Court can range from having a low of 5 members to a high of 10 members, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the government today. Although the Supreme Court of Justice is at the head of the court system, the power of the Supreme Court has grown exponentially to a point where it could be considered more powerful than Congress and the power of

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.

Read More
2288 Words | 10 Pages

The legal implications and feasibility of integrating the Syariah courts into the federal judicial system through restoration of Article 121 of Federal Constitution Prior to 1988, Article 121(1) of Federal Constitution provided as follows: Subject to Clause (2) the judicial power of the Federation shall be vested in two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction and status, namely— (a) one in the States of Malaya, which shall be known as the High Court in Malaya and shall have its principal registry in Kuala Lumpur; and (b) one in the States of Sabah and Sarawak, which shall be known as the High Court in Borneo and shall have its principal registry at such place in the States of Sabah and Sarawak as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may determine;

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Airtastic

Open Document