Pros And Cons Of Al Gore

491 Words2 Pages

Arguments that Al Gore has made have been proven true. He brought up the fact that sea levels will rise. This is due to the fact of temperatures are rising. It always makes the ocean more acidic. He predicted that Carbon Dioxide will control temperature. Carbon dioxide from human activity goes into the atmosphere. However, as carbon dioxide dissolves in seawater, it forms carbonic acid, acidifying the ocean. Ocean acidification will likely cause serious harm to marine organisms such as corals, lobsters, and sea urchins. Al Gore brought up the causes on Hurricane Katrina was man made. It is crazy, to imagine that even after years they are still trying to recover from it. So, I feel sorry for New Orleans that they produced the problem, that destroyed their homes. As meteorologists, can detect hurricanes, they can also …show more content…

He expected the Artic to be completed melted by 2014. But we still have the Artic. People are always worried about the Polar bears dying. But the population of them has increase over time. An argument that was made is the Sahara Desert, is drying up. This is untrue because the Sahel benefits from it. The Sahara desert is an arid area, but it provides benefits to the Sahel. The Sahel is at at great risk for overgrazing. Another great risk that all economies live in is the amount of CO2 we put in the air. But over the years, we learn how bad it is for people. However, plants need it. It is a confusing concept. I feel, we need CO2 in the air, so I don’t think too much off it is a bad thing. Our world is always populating, so trying to stop it will be impossible. This message was not presented in an easy way. It was dragged out because he talked about his life stories. I only wanted to know the facts that had to be addressed. I don’t care about his past, to understand about global warming. The message would be presented to people who voted or older if he was talking about the