Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal experiments and their cruelty
Pros and cons about animal testing
Should animals be used in research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal experiments and their cruelty
Pros and cons about animal testing
Should animals be used in research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
According to Biology online, Animal testing is defined as using animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of take a look at capsules before proceeding to human scientific trials. Animal experimentation has been functioning since ancient Greece when Aristotle and Hippocrates first made their model of the human body based on what they had observed via animal dissection. Similarly, Romans used animals to do greater medical assessments on animals like pigs, monkeys and dogs. After that, the age of the Renaissance continued medical research. “As such, the 20th century had a large boom in animal experimentation until 1980 when activists commenced standing up against the labs (Branson)”.
Animal research has contributed to understanding and treating conditions such as brain injury, childhood leukemia, and brain cancer, tuberculosis, and many others. Chris Abee, Director of the University Of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 's animal research facility, says that “we wouldn 't have a vaccine for hepatitis B
The controversies over animal testing have been hotly debated internationally by many organizations that support and protest the issue. Without the treatments concocted under animal experimentation, millions of human and animals lives would have been lost to dangerous diseases such as hepatitis B, measles, smallpox, and numerous others, while almost all of humanity would succumb to the infectious nature of other minor diseases. With sick humans and animals carrying the afflicted genetics to the new generations will lead to undesirable mutations, hereditary illness, and shorter life span of the future offsprings. Animals would gradually die out from the new strain of viruses destroying their bodies, and the extinction of livestock would eventually
Several tests on animals, for things like cosmetics, involve giving the animals harmful substances on their bare skin, and placing drops in their eyes without pain relief. Even Though animals can not speak what they are feeling, they all go through excruciating pain when labs perform tests on them. Animals around the world that are used in labs often get treated like they are nothing, and are just a test subject. Throughout their life, they will be tortured many times and abused without any consideration that they are actually in pain. Many times animals will die in the labs or they will get killed after they are not needed anymore.
Although experimenting with animals has advanced what people know about the world today, there are now new methods that do not involve experimenting on animals. According to the article “About Animal Experimentation” by Humane Society International, “Human genome and birth of functional genomics, the explosive growth of computer power and computational biology, and high speed robot automation of cell based screening systems has sparked quite a revolution in biology…predictions regarding human safety and risk are potentially more relevant to people in the real world than animal tests.” (About Animal Experimentation). Methods such as computer biology, genomics, and more have resulted from people trying to find other ways to test for what they
While the common belief is that animals are treated inhumanely, the animals “are actually treated quite well, in accordance with the strict regulations which govern animal care”(Shany). The facilities where animal testing is being done are monitored closely to assure the animals are being taken care of. A survey on the number of animals being used shows that “only 6% of animals being tested experience pain”(Shany). Without animal testing we would not have a vaccine for cholera, polio, meningitis or anthrax. Other medical advances found through animal testing are; penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin, and kidney transplants.
New studies are being published on the ethical failings of researchers to adequately represent data in a variety of contexts. This could have serious implications for the veracity of certain information germane to deliberations on whether or not studies should progress to the next stage, among other things. One new American study, for example, has found that placebo groups are used often in clinical trials despite a lack of appropriate guidelines for how they can be used, and the study shows how problematic that is. Meanwhile, a German and Canadian study is showing what is perhaps an even bigger deal, which is that inadequacies in the designs of animal studies as well as insufficient reporting of said studies are proving to be a circumvention
Between animal rights activists and the scientists themselves, testing on animals has been a debatable subject for many years. Animal activists are known for being hard headed defenders for the rights of the friendly creatures on the planet, but the scientists believe in using the rodents for research purposes such as finding treatments and cures for genetic diseases and disorders. Thanks to the test subjects, scientists were able to find cures or treatments for breast cancer, cystic fibrosis, leukemia, and different types of sclerosis. Disorders and diseases like these are inherited, when genes pass from parents to their offspring.
all of the sick individuals that it helps because the act of utilizing non-humans in research does the most good for the most people (Lyons, 2001). Protesters are also considered stakeholders due to the fact that they are usually advocating animal sentience and their rights to live naturally, and not in a laboratory setting. Typically, protestors often have an issue concerning this dilemma due to their own ignorance. Unfortunately, this ignorance usually centers on misinformation obtained from the internet, their own imaginations, and the fact that they do not believe that animal research is necessary. Due to their position of ignorance, a protestor cannot present fair scientific data unless they have actually experienced the animal research
Considering the external validity in terms of using rats and mice are harder to generalize to humans than say chimps I would say that it does make a difference. Ask most people and I think you would find that experimenting on rats as opposed to chimps is a long leap ethically. Although both are mammals I believe that the closer the animal’s mind comes to the human mind the more ethical concerns are raised, even though the closer correlation would make them more generalizable. I would have to say that I did not have any strong opinions on the ethical nature of animal research, so other than informative the statistic did not impact me one way or the other.
Animal testing and animal experimentation is an ancient practice. In ancient times, animal testing was the only way to test the safety of medicines. With the advance technology we have today there are more accurate and humane methods to test the safety of products and drugs. Yet, the FDA, which is responsible for guaranteeing the safety of drugs and products, only requires products to go through animal testing. Every year there are products and drugs that pass the FDA’s animal testing and go to the market and end up hurting or killing thousands of people.
Animal testing is it worth it or not? “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. We all drank the kool-aid on that one, me included. The problem is that it hasn 't worked, and it 's time we stopped dancing around the problem. We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans” said by Dr. Elias Zerhouni, former director of the National Institutes of Health (8 Expert Quotes Admitting That Testing on Animals Is Unreliable, page 2).
Few can argue against animal research when it comes to assistance for medical advancement. However, with advancement of medicine, the ethical treatment of animals may be sacrificed. In the city of Detroit, Wayne State University is under investigation for cruel and unusual methods to their animal testing. Wayne State University has been using dogs for cardiovascular research. Therefore, they are mainly on a treadmill for most of the day and “sometimes they’re so tired they can’t even eat — they’re listless, then the dogs are all eventually euthanized if they don’t die on the treadmill or in their cage later.”
Animals are used for research in today's society, this research is growing bigger and bigger as the years go by. There is many different view points on animal research both good and bad, There is many different outlooks and view points on animal research that have people wondering if it should be allowed or illegal. Scientists use this for their own benefits and money, while the outsiders are looking in and think it is cruel. In 2011, over 1,000 biochemist scientists were polled, 90% of these agreed that animal research was good to use.