Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the benefits of animal testing
Neagtive impacts of animals testing
Animal testing animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the benefits of animal testing
Neagtive impacts of animals testing
Animal testing animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the benefits of animal testing
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
According to Biology online, Animal testing is defined as using animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of take a look at capsules before proceeding to human scientific trials. Animal experimentation has been functioning since ancient Greece when Aristotle and Hippocrates first made their model of the human body based on what they had observed via animal dissection. Similarly, Romans used animals to do greater medical assessments on animals like pigs, monkeys and dogs. After that, the age of the Renaissance continued medical research. “As such, the 20th century had a large boom in animal experimentation until 1980 when activists commenced standing up against the labs (Branson)”.
Companies should reconsider the usefulness and dependency of animal testing when it comes to its benefits to humankind. There are tests called in-vitro which detect the specific toxic properties of a drug or chemical by using human cells. Due to using human cells the results will be more accurate and relevant for us. Even though animals have benefited from certain medical trials, for instance the rabies vaccination, they still have to go through harsh experiments over and over again to make sure the vaccination
The study took a look at publicly paid for animal tests in the United States and the United Kingdom. The scientists used monkeys and rodents as their primary test subjects. Nearly 300 reports were collected from leading biomedical research publishers. Out of all of the acquired publications, only 59% of them proclaimed their study’s goal, the amount of animals that they used, and important traits of their test subjects. All of these factors are expected to be made public in order to display a credible and successful scientific experiment (Kilkenny et al. 3).
The Surprising Pros of Animal Testing You Never Thought About Animal testing has been a very controversial topic from the very beginning. The following write-up lists some of the pros of animal testing... Across the globe, new products ranging from drugs for cancer, diabetes, and heart disease to cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoos, etc., are tested on animals. There are many questions regarding the ethics of using animals for testing. Because of this, several regulations have been put in place that evaluate and control animal testing in laboratories.
The controversies over animal testing have been hotly debated internationally by many organizations that support and protest the issue. Without the treatments concocted under animal experimentation, millions of human and animals lives would have been lost to dangerous diseases such as hepatitis B, measles, smallpox, and numerous others, while almost all of humanity would succumb to the infectious nature of other minor diseases. With sick humans and animals carrying the afflicted genetics to the new generations will lead to undesirable mutations, hereditary illness, and shorter life span of the future offsprings. Animals would gradually die out from the new strain of viruses destroying their bodies, and the extinction of livestock would eventually
Animal testing is a subject that has been deemed controversial for quite a long time now, and is still argued today. Now, you'll see many companies breaking from this animal testing, and making vegan products and selling almost just as well. Just listening to the word,"Animal testing" automatically makes you think of something horrible and inhumane, but there are reasons that it isn't. California Biomedical Research Association says that almost every medical breakthrough within the last 100 years has been derived from animal testing. Animals, especially those that have extremely similar DNA to ours, have been exceptionally helpful in medical research.
Considering Alternative Methods: If you’re still in the camp ‘principally against anything anthropocentric’, then that’s fine. It also means you’re going to consider any animal testing outright wrong, if it’s purpose is to make discoveries for humans. That’s why alternative methods are so important, because they allow us to avoid human extinction – which would cause the extinction of all other animals – without committing the sins of humanity that Maheny talks about. If you’re pro-anthropocentric, but also get pleasure in needlessly slaughtering animals, then allow me to elaborate on just how ‘needless’ this slaughtering really is.
26 million animals are used every single year in the US for scientific, and commercial testing. Animals are usually used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of certain medications, or any products meant for human use, or other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Testing on animals has been lasting from at least 500 BC. Some good uses for animal testing that has come out to be good is that it had brought us development of many life-saving treatments for both animals and humans.
Humans are the superior species, but this doesn’t imply that we shouldn’t possess a moral mindset when it comes to animal testing. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods, drugs, and human luxuries (e.g. cosmetics, facial cleansers, perfumes, adhesives, etc.). Considering the previous, we can conclude everyone has consumed and/or used a product verified by the FDA from the result of animal testing. While society may consider animal testing inhumane, it is necessary for medical breakthroughs.
Animal testing is not necessary due to available alternative methods, and using Russell and Burch's 3 R's of animal testing, animal testing can be diminished. The roots of animal testing lie in early Greek research (Ross-Fichtner and Noble 16-19). Scientists including Aristotle and Galen performed experiments on animals to advance anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology (Ross-Fichtner and Noble 16-19). Since then, animal testing has become the main route to supply greater understanding in medical research, chemical toxicity, and cosmetic safety. Berggren says that "Safety assessment for repeated dose toxicity is one of the largest challenges in the process to replace animal testing."
When I first starting doing my research relating to animal testing, I realize that there were various methods in the scientific world that could be used in this type of experimental phase such as (Alternatives to Animal Testing, 2016): organ-on-chip which are used to mimic the structure along with function of the human systems in the body, cell based test and tissue models which can be used for testing consumer products and etc. The factors concerning and dealing with animals testing has been a part of society threshold of experimental concepts for years even though people have their pros and con’s about its cruel and expensive funding ritual of doing these type of test. There are also many other non-animal systems of testing which have
The topic for today would be that if animal testing should be stopped. I would like to stand with the pro side because animal cruelty is a very serious problem to animal kind today. They can be argued with several reasons such as, it is cruel and inhumane treatment, it can lead to misleading research, and plenty of animal lives are wasted and we do not want to raise it higher. My first argument should be that it is cruel and inhumane acts or treatment.
Animals and other lifeforms are constantly used to test products we as consumers use daily. However, the ethics and morality of this process is questioned by medical professionals and renowned scientists. Although essential to research labs, animal activists continue to fight for the removal of the so-called cruel testing. When in reality, mammals and other organisms should remain as our main subject because these creatures have provided us with extravagant breakthroughs in 21st century consumables and prescriptions. Living animals are used in testing to help put things like hygiene products and other consumables on the shelves of our favorite stores (The Surprising Pros).
Animal testing has always been an immense controversy. As people, we all have different opinions and moral values, and this definitely effects how we see things. Of course this means that everyone has something dissimilar to say about the issue of testing on animals. However, who is to say whether it is truly right or wrong to use animals in the process of discovering in the medical field?