ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

278 Words2 Pages
Animal testing has been a controversial topic for generations. Is it alright to test new medication and risk the lives of innocent animals to help the future of human health? In this paper, we will research this topic, looking at both the pros and the cons, and at the end I will give you my opinion on the topic. We’ll look at the positives first. It has helped scientists discover many new cures and treatments for diseases. An experiment conducted on dogs where they had their pancreases removed led to the discovery of insulin. Insulin is needed for diabetic patients in controlling blood sugar levels. Other animal testing on animals led to the near destruction of the polio virus. In 1988, there were 350,000 cases of polio but by 2012, there
Show More
Related
465 Words | 2 Pages

There is much controversy over whether or not animals should be used to test new procedures and medications. I personally believe that animal testing is crucial to scientific development. Every life lost is a tragedy but as seen in the story, Flowers for Algernon, by Daniel Keys, it will help us determine what will happen to a human test subjects without human losses. In this essay I will support my belief that animal research is important to human survival and is worth the risk. Animal research has played a vital part in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade.

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Without animal testing, medicine that we are familiar with today wouldn’t exist. Animal testing has enabled us to find treatments for cancer, infections, for antibiotics, and even for vaccines. For seven years, an epidemic of one of the world’s most feared diseases shattered lives across the entire continent of North America. This killer disease,

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Begin your paper with a opening sentence about your topic that catches the reader’s attention. Reference the list on the front for ideas. Animal experimentation is very controversial in today's society due to its advantages and disadvantages it has. Include context: provide the information the reader will need to understand the topic. Vivisectionists claim that animal testing helps advance medical research however anti animal testers strongly believe otherwise.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

The testing of animals has prevented millions of cases of over 200 diseases within animals. In humans, the development of vaccinations for multiple diseases has come from animal testing. This article’s purpose was to tell the achievements that animal testing has accomplished over the years. It also showed that animal testing does not only help humans but animals too. I am going to include this information in my paper to show the people who are fighting against animal testing are fighting improvements with humans and animals.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing is not necessary due to available alternative methods, and using Russell and Burch's 3 R's of animal testing, animal testing can be diminished. The roots of animal testing lie in early Greek research (Ross-Fichtner and Noble 16-19). Scientists including Aristotle and Galen performed experiments on animals to advance anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology (Ross-Fichtner and Noble 16-19). Since then, animal testing has become the main route to supply greater understanding in medical research, chemical toxicity, and cosmetic safety. Berggren says that "Safety assessment for repeated dose toxicity is one of the largest challenges in the process to replace animal testing."

Read More
906 Words | 4 Pages

Specific cases mentioned include the medical breakthrough for diabetes. This breakthrough in the medical field is all thanks to the removal of the pancreases of dogs and the discovery of insulin. Another supporting claim the association made to support their opinion is the fact that the testing of the polio vaccine on animals resulted in reducing the global disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 27 cases in 2016. Without animal testing major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, and tuberculosis. The development of pacemakers, cardiac valves substitutes, and anesthetics have all been contributions of animal testing (ProCon).

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

How would you feel if you found out your precious Fido or Fiona was in a laboratory being used as a test subject? Take the feelings you had if you found out and apply them to the animals who are actually in the lab. Do these animals not deserve the same sympathy? The products you may have on now could have been tested on an animal. The testing they endure I consider to be inhumane and unnecessary.

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

There are people out in the world who don’t see the good things when I come to animal testing. They just look at all the negatives and think about the animals in the process of the experiments and researches. What they don’t see, is that how much they help us humans in staying alive and making special treatments. When testing the animals, they have contributed to so many cures and treatments, and sometimes the animals don’t even die. According to ProCon.org on November 2, 2017, “animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, and etc.”

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

Troy Daum November 8th, 2017 AEPS 110 The Moral Efficacy of Animal Experimentation on Invertebrates Animal experimentation is a practice that spans thousands of years and has been crucial to the advancement of scientific knowledge in a broad range of disciplines from health and medicine to genetics. The earliest writings of scientific inquiry through this means traces back to the Ancient Greeks, which describe dissections of farm animals as an “experimental method of testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients” (Greek & Greek 2004). In more recent history, philosophers, animal activists, and scientists alike have called in to question the virtue of certain controversial methods used by researchers to conduct experiments. Organizations such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) are well known on the world stage for their

Read More
1346 Words | 6 Pages

Testing medications on animals for the benefit of human beings is morally wrong and can be very expensive. It is also wrong because animals have no say in the matter if they want to be tested on or not. Since the medications are for human life, they should test the medications on humans. Since they test the medications on animals instead of humans there is no guarantee that the medications are going to be beneficial to humans. Animals are meant to be loved and bring joy to a person’s life, not be forced have no say in what happens to theirs.

Read More
1630 Words | 7 Pages

When it comes to the topic of testing the consumer products before putting them out on the market, a controversial issue has been whether animal testing is still viable or not. On one hand, many people such as protesters are against animal testing and experimentation. They say its cruel and inhumane, there’s other ways to test products other than on animals. On the other hand, some argue that it’s viable, it makes products safe for us to use, and has helped discover treatments for diseases. Some medical procedures tested on animals has led to millions of lives being saved, benefiting us.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever wondered how scientists develop the medicine you take when you catch a cold? Within the lab wall, millions of actions can be taken against animals, after many years of evolution “Animal testing” remains an active argument, Animal testing has been there since late 1800 when Louis Pasteur applied his tests on chicken to develop a drug to treat pox and since then it has taken the scientific world by strike that left the humanity with numerous side effects, There’s no doubt that alternative methods are more accurate, factual and detailed even if there are scientists who still believe the complete opposite, that medical research should depend mainly on animal tests despite its physical and psychological harm. Firstly; Drugs

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Then again, medical examinations involving animal testing have greatly improved the health being of humans. Surgical methods and medications nowadays would not be discovered if it was not for the understanding of the diseases and how the body works. This can be approached by using animal testing. Animal experimentation has contributed to the abundance of medication we now have in the palm of our hands. For instance, we have treatments for asthma, high blood pressure, and diabetes which were all discovered using animal testing.

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

Once more animal testing is extremely controversial and popular over past decades, and the test is majority about the process of using non-humans creatures for the purpose of experimentation. Throughout history, although animal testing has proven beneficial to mankind, but many individuals continue to question the ethicality of the practice on animal, but since it is unethical and legible to practice on human. For example, it would be unacceptable and unethical to explore the potential of medicine’s risk through human body, which means in order to detect potential of effects and damages (Mangipudy, Burkhardt, & Kadambi, 2014), the practice have to be testing on another living organism that are similar to human anatomy. According to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society (n.d) that all medical advance in the last century is due to animals testing and research on animals have provides useful information to predict how a new drug will affect a human. In other words, scientists must test the new drugs’ safety and effectiveness on animal before using them on the human, once the new drugs are proven safe in animal studies, then it will be used in clinical studies (Science, Medicine, and Animals, 2004)

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document