ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Articles Of Confederation

753 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on democratic principles

I am going to write about how the Articles of confederation was revised, American democracy was made. I am also going to talk about the founding fathers who made it possible. There were two ideas that influenced the constitution. The first idea was weakened by Articles and confederation. The congress couldn’t collect any taxes, they couldn’t amend the rules, there were 13 Independent nations, there wasn’t any Judicial system, no executives, and there was only one house of the legislative. To solve the problem the founding fathers healed a meeting in Philadelphia on May 25 to September 17,1787 during the war. There were 55 men from the 13 states. They had to and agreed to meet secretly for their safety. They decided to elect George Washington as the president of the convention. George washington was elected as the president of the convention because he won the revolutionary war that set the America free. He was the Chief of the Continental Army, and 2 years later he served two terms as the first president of the US. All of the men had no plans for the changes except for James Madison. Madison was the fourth president and also served 2 terms from 1809 to 1817. His plan was to have a strong central government that …show more content…

The English Bill of Rights has the power to tax people, it limits the power of the king and queen. The english bill of rights stopped the king form having a standing army and kept the monarchy from housing the homes in America. When the standing army was in America the king told the soldiers to stay in the locals homes. That was in 1774 and it wasn’t fair because the king didn’t pay for the soldiers stay. In England our army couldn’t stay at the locals homes. By doing that it was violating the English Bill of Rights. Then it all leads to the American Revolution after the people rebelled against the king. Give the people in parliament the freedom of speech. Everyone had the right to

Show More
Related
365 Words | 2 Pages

1a. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress didn’t have the power to tax the colonies so their only option was to request the states for money, which often ended in rejection. Because Congress had so little money to regulate the army/navy and resolve crises, they sold off western lands and printed worthless print money in desperate attempts to do without money. The constitution solves this dilemma by giving Congress the power to make revenue through taxing and borrowing and also the power to appropriate funds.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Following the American secession from Britain in 1776, the colonies needed to implement a form of self-governance. In the early years of the Revolutionary War, the colonies drafted the Articles of Confederation, which outlined an agreement to loosely ally the states. At the time, American colonists were extremely wary of strong central governments. Thus, under the Articles, the United States maintained a weak central government with strong state governments. With this situation in place, the success of the U.S. government was mixed.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

After fighting for America’s independence the nation was faced with the situation of developing their own government; with that idea the Articles of Confederation were made as a way to define the government’s structure. With the articles came dysfunction, and a lack of authority. Consequently the dysfunction caused division in the nation, separating the people into two political parties, Federalist and anti-federalist. The parties developed over time and discord, with the development of the Constitution into the Federalist Party and the Democratic Republican Party. The two parties, the Federalist, and the Democratic Republicans, based on their backgrounds and means of income, opposed each other with differing political and economic views.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

er, the Articles placed the power in the hands of the state, which led to economic troubles; but it also led to leadership shortfall. The fact that there was no independent judiciary, no leader of foreign affairs, and an inability to deal with internal and external threats made, caused a lot of problems for America. Finally, the Articles of Confederation was ineffective in making a set of rules that made legislating under this structure inefficient. Each state had one vote, therefore, states with a large population or small population had the same weight in voting in Congress. It also took nine votes out of thirteen to approve legislation.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More
2002 Words | 9 Pages

Two contradicting ideas in one document, how is that possible? The Constitution was created in 1787 to replace the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was a unicameral legislature, led by the Confederate Congress, that caused many problems between the government and the people. It failed for many reasons, including the fact that all thirteen states needed to be on the same page to ratify the Articles and it was not able to create a united, powerful nation. Congress also did not have the power to “enforce taxes, regulate commerce between states, and compel state cooperation,” to escape debt (Benson 1).

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

However, when they assembled, they decided to scrap the Articles of Confederation entirely and drafted a new constitution for the United States (US: A Narrative History, 152). The delegates had difficulties over coming up with a way to give a proper balance of control between the federal and state governments and between large and small states (Lecture). The delegates elected George Washington to preside over the Convention (Lecture). The most argumentative disputes revolved around arrangement and election of the Senate, how proportional representation was to be defined whether to divide the executive power between three persons or invest the power into a single president, how to elect the president, how long his term was to be and whether he could run for re-election, and what offenses should be impeachable (US: A Narrative History, 152). After the final issues were resolved, the Committee on Style produced the final version, and it was voted on and sent to the states (US: A Narrative History,

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

At the Constitutional Convention, our founding fathers met to reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, not knowing that they would create the United States Constitution, an entire new format of government. They wanted to create a government that was powerful yet restricted in certain ways, in order to create equal representation for all people. Three main compromises were made at the Constitutional Convention. These compromises were The Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the addition of the Bill of Rights.

Read More
1339 Words | 6 Pages

This statement was enhanced by the English Bill of Rights, which was passed in 1689. “Exactly 100 prior, 1689, Parliament brought an end to a time of great turmoil in England–the Glorious Revolution–with the English Bill of Rights” (Eskridge). Therefore, the colonies were living to their own form of government and stripping away the basic rights of the framed and accused

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

In the year 1787, Alexander Hamilton decided that the United States had to amend the Articles of Confederation, and sent out an invitation to the thirteen colonies. The meeting included 55 delegates from twelve colonies. The Constitutional Convention was a meeting that determined whether or not the Articles of Confederation were going to be kept or disregarded. A revolution is usually a violent attempt by many people to end the rule of one government and start a new one: a sudden, extreme, or complete change in the way people live, work, etc. (Merriam Webster Dictionary).

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.

Read More
1256 Words | 6 Pages

“'Tis done. We have become a nation.” said Benjamin Rush after the ratification of the Constitution on July 9, 1788. At this moment a new nation was born, with a basis that is at the heart of American history. The founding fathers wrote the Constitution after the failure of the Articles of Confederation.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

To rectify the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, a constitutional convention created a federal system and built into it practical devices to control factions who would otherwise pursue their own ends to the detriment of the larger society. Those safeguards were representative government, three branches of government that contained checks and balances, and a federal system. The branches are similar in their organization with elected leaders, legislators and judges. However, some states appoint their judges while the President decides Supreme Court Judges.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

The English Bill of Rights was an Act of the British Parliament that deals with certain matters of the country and gives the main points of basic civil rights. This bill was ratified on December 16, 1689. It was made to limit the power of the monarchy and give emphasis to the rights of Parliament. These rights included the requirement of Parliament to run the government, free elections, and freedom of speech in Parliament. This bill describes many of the mistakes King James II made during his reign since he tried to run government without Parliament and almost ruined Britain's economy and structure.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

The Glorious Revolution destroyed the idea of divine-right monarchy. William and Mary acknowledged the English throne knowing that the ultimate power in the state was to be divided between the king and Parliament. The monarchy of England thus went towards a constitutional direction. Another example that triggered change was the English Bill of Rights in 1689. It stated that laws were to be made in Parliament, and could not be suspended by the king.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Articles Of Confederation

Related Topics

Open Document