ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Being Censored By The Federal Government

969 Words4 Pages

Federal Government and Censorship The FBI’s Terrorist Screening Database contains about 1 million records. About 5,000 of those records — 0.5 percent — are Americans. In addition, in 2016, 78 percent of U.S. Americans had a social media profile. That information allows one to conclude that some of those Americans, if not all, on the Terrorist Screening Database have a social media profile. However, this statistic does not prove that they are using the profile for recruitment or propaganda, yet they have the ability to at their fingertips. With the concerning rise in terrorist recruitment via Internet, social media should be censored by the Federal Government to ensure safety in the lives of American adults, teenagers and children; with an end goal to enable a …show more content…

Censorship of the Internet relates to the First Amendment. The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Americans against Internet censorship argue that censoring social media will violate their Freedom of speech. Of course, freedom of speech is important; at the same time, people can, and often do, abuse freedom. If one posts online, they need to be held accountable for it. If censorship did not exist, there would be an overwhelming amount of inappropriate content floating around. Censorship is here for a reason. It is not to just annoy people or make them fear their rights are being compromised, it is here to prevent certain audiences from seeing certain content. American children are now growing up in a society where they do not know life without the Internet. Teens are spending more than one-third of their

Open Document