ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Charter Of Rights And Freedom

834 Words4 Pages

The positive effect that brought by the charter of right and freedom

During the October crisis the privacy and properties were invaded by the government severely. The rights of the residents were ignored. But thanks to the Charter of Right and Freedom the government can do it no more. The charter stated specific list of residential rights which created positive effects on protecting civilian’s right in Canada

The Charter of Right and Freedom protected and promoted the right if the civilians of Canada. The first section of the Charter of Right and Freedom stated “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified …show more content…

This part was also known as the equal right. On section 15, it stated that any discrimination against the race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability would be considered as actions against the Charter of Right and Freedom, section 15 also valid legal process. It guaranteed that the minority group with distinct cultural and ethnic identity will not be discriminated by others, and it promoted their rights to be respected. Even the racism still exists but section 15 minimized this principle. But the most severe issue between the minority and majority group would be the Quebec issue. Through the history, Quebec Francophone and the rest Anglophones came up several agreements on language education and culture but it never really fixes this problem. French speakers and English speakers discriminate each other and they refuse to provide education and services. Possible solution was placed in the section 16-23. In section 16-22 established the bilingual system and the position of the French language, it guaranteed French would be available in all government services and parliament. The bill in French and English versions is equally authoritative.these section provide a path to ameliorate the relationship; section 23 provided the the language education right, subsection (A) item one stated: “whose first language learned and still

Show More
Related
264 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution came to fruition as an answer for the issues and numerous shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. Not every person concurred with the Constitution or even the said issues emerging from the Articles of Confederation. These people were called Anti-Federalists and their thoughts would not be as effective as the thoughts of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist thought's reflected numerous qualities of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution should have been endorsed with a specific end goal to conjure change and solvethe issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists had the plans to make the country the best is could be, and also sufficiently giving rights to citizens.

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

The composers of the U.S. Constitution needed to empower government activity; the designers of the Texas Constitution needed to incapacitate government activity. While the U.S. Constitution makes a unitary official that packs official power in the president, the Texas Constitution makes a plural official that scatters official power over numerous chose workplaces, along these lines dividing the official branch of government and averting control over the official branch from gathering in any one individual or office. One purpose of intrigue, be that as it may, concern the CEO's energy to veto bills go by the governing body. The detail veto in the Texas Constitution permits the senator to veto particular things contained inside apportionments

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction A constitution provides the fundamental rules and principles that govern a country. It creates many of the institutions and branches of government, and defines their powers. The Canadian constitution is the basis on which Canada was founded on. It is the pillars upon which Canada’s government was built on, as it specifies what our government can and cannot do.

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

According to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, everyone has right of “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication” (Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982). But this wasn’t the case in the 30’s. Minority rights were neglected throughout Canadian history because of the lack of attention given to them. But now, since there are actions being enforced to help against discrimination and racism, it has helped Canada in a positive way. The War Measures Act was one example of minority rights starting to grow.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention took place from May 25th to September 17th, 1787, in the state of Pennsylvania. The Convention was created to revise the Articles of Confederation, and to create a new government. There were many disputes that presented themselves during the Convention, the major arguments being: Federalist vs. Anti-Federalists, Large State vs. Small State, Slavery, and One vs. Multiple Leaders. One debate was versus the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

There are countless Arguments both for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. Some of the main arguments of the Federalist include that a strong National government offered protection for the people’s rights, the government would benefit from a 3 branch system and a system of checks and balances needed to be created. Some of the main ideas of the anti-federalist were that the National Government would have too much power, a Bill of Right needed to be added, the constitutions effect of the government would be too tyrannical, and that the federal court system would be too powerful. Considered the Father of the Constitution, James Madison was detrimental in the creation In the US Constitution.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The new constitution couldn’t please everyone. Some people liked it but some didn't. The two sides were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, whereas the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. They would have debates about ratifying the Constitution.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

I feel that the US Constitution is somewhat outdated, and is in need of a revision. As everybody knows, the world has changed a lot in the past 250 years. These changes are things like transportation, total number of people in the world, and major things like the internet and technology. The events and problems that the Constitution solved years ago are a lot different than the problems that we face today. However, some of the more universal and basic rules of the constitution should not be subject to change because they still apply to today.

Read More
1705 Words | 7 Pages

Since Pearson brought bilingualism into being, he wanted to be the last unilingual Prime Minister and his wish came true. There is no official rule but all the Prime Ministerial candidates after Pearson are bilingual. This way, the Prime Minister can provide more services to the people living in Canada because he knows another language. Additionally, French people would not feel like second-class citizens as they have felt before because no one bothered to learn their language. Furthermore, Quebec could have separated from Canada in 1967 making Pearson’s institution of bilingualism futile.

Read More
313 Words | 2 Pages

I believe the constitution created a just government, threes pieces of reasons for my claim are Impeachment, Congress has power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, Ability to amend the constitution. To begin, the Senate has the sole power of impeachment to remove the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the united states for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors (Article 2, Section 4). The importance of impeachment is to remove the corrupt and wrong doers from positions of power. With this you can make sure that no one is above the law, no matter the position you hold.

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is located in the first part of the Canadian Constitution and came into effect on April 17, 1982. The Charter is a document that outlines a set of constitutional principles that assist in creating a free and democratic country and is the most important of the laws in Canada. Some of the laws include: Fundamental freedoms (e.g. freedom of expression); democratic rights (e.g. the right to vote); mobility rights (e.g. the right to live wherever one choses in Canada); legal rights (e.g. the right to life and security); equality rights; language rights; minority-language educational rights and aboriginal and treaty rights. These laws guarantee the basic values of fairness, respect and tolerance for every

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Civic Reflection Issue 1- Change in Point of View The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights which outlines and protects the basic rights and fundamental freedoms that all Canadians have. These include the fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, equality rights, language rights, and Aboriginal and treaty rights. The Canadian Charter of Rights is extremely important to the citizens of Canada as it has given important meaning to the protection of our rights. It makes sure that minorities and vulnerable groups are protected through equality rights.

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms first came into effect on April 17, 1982. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is one part of the Canadian Constitution, created in 1867. The Constitution is a set of laws containing the basic rules about how a country operates. The Charter sets out those rights and freedoms that Canadians believe are necessary in a free and democratic society. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an effective tool to ensure and maintain a just society as it protects the innocence of people, protects and ensures past laws and states fundamental freedoms, all of which work to create a thriving society.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The improvement of the rights of the Canadian Immigrants Canada, as one of the biggest immigration countries, welcomes people from all over the the world and forms a representative multicultural atmosphere in today’s society. Over these few decays, the country has always been consummating the laws to provide immigrants equal rights and freedoms, and better treatments they could receive. However, Canadian immigration laws were not unprejudiced and it eventually caused a “legal discrimination” before 1976. The legal rights of the immigrant groups have improved significantly because of the demands of developing the country, the influences of the wars, and the globalization of the world. Since 1880s, more immigrants and foreigners came to Canada because of the railway construction project.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Charter Of Rights And Freedom

Related Topics

Open Document