ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Compensation For College Athletes

599 Words3 Pages

The Standpoints on Compensation for College Athletes Opponents to collegiate athlete compensation argue that many others believe that the funding shouldn’t be going to the student-athletes but back into the schools or that sports organization. NIL became a big part of involving compensation for athletes. The NCAA started as just paying their members, but has improved . “The NCAA board of directors announced that the organization was adopting an interim policy that allowed incoming and current student-athletes in all three NCAA divisions to profit from their NIL. (. . .) The new policy also allows student-athletes to hire professional agents to negotiate deals on their behalf” (Dilascio). Many thought that they should be paying payers as well because they are …show more content…

Athletes put in the same amount of time and effort if as the coaches.“Coaches receive huge deals from shoe companies (. . .) while the players are limited to wearing that corporation's shoes and apparel. An open market operates when it comes to revenue for coaches, resulting in huge pay packages for the top names, but not so for star players. When a coach is fired or resigns, he often receives a ‘golden parachute’, which sometimes is in the multimillion-dollar category, while players who leave a program early receive nothing but vilification for being disloyal” (Eitzen). The difference between athletes and coaches is that coaches are being paid for coaching the athletes, yet the students aren’t being paid. Even though they are presenting their work so they should be making some profit. The importance of this quote shows that many college athletes don't go to college for an education; they go mainly because they believe their skills, hard work, and time will take them somewhere. Coaches and students both play a big part in the process of paying athletes, along with the NIL deal created in the early

Open Document