As discussed in the article, the ethical issues surrounding pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PES) are genetic fatalism and the 'new' eugenics movement. Drawing on these concepts and my stance on the interconnection between Eugenics and PES, this essay argues that selecting genetic traits through PES is unethical. This essay's argument will be achieved by first discussing the context of the article. Secondly, in an isolated analysis, I will discuss how genetic essentialism and fatalism can potentially undermine the autonomy and dignity of individuals whilst using a phenomenological framework and discussing choices involved in one's life. Then I will discuss the issue of 'new' eugenics, a free market system of eugenics, which can lead to further social inequalities for those deemed less desirable. Lastly, I will argue that eugenics and the fundamental reasoning behind the pre-implantation genetic diagnosis' Procreative beneficence' are not morally permissible. Explanation Of The Article Lenz and Carmi's article discusses …show more content…
Applying this on a societal level, we can conclude that there is an inherent connection between Procreative beneficence and eugenics. Both perspectives involve valuing and prioritising certain traits or characteristics as superior or beneficial while disregarding or devaluing others. This can lead to the marginalisation or discrimination of individuals who do not possess the desired traits or fall outside the prescribed criteria. Thus, through the idea of universal well-being, I have made several links through eugenics, and PES is valid. However, the association between procreative beneficence and eugenics does not imply that proponents of procreative beneficence necessarily endorse or advocate for eugenic practices; instead, it creates a dangerous connection between