ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Federalists

730 Words3 Pages

Under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, Federalists became a popular political party at the end of George Washington’s term. As a proud Federalists in The United Stated under George Washington, a numerous amount of hypocrisy has consumed the population on, “What were Federalists’ views?” A Federalist strongly believed in the power of the national government because the central government would have yielded stability to the country. Instead of a democracy or popular sovereignty, an “aristocratic leadership,” would better lead the nation (History in the Making - Chapter 10). Therefore, the Constitution was strongly supported by us. With a “manual” written by highly educated, upper men, the Constitution was a governing …show more content…

The document consisted of acts/ laws that if violated citizens would have suffered consequences. For example, the document proclaimed that if, “any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States” (Sedition Act), would have been convicted, punished, and imprisoned. Our fellow opponents, the Republicans, stated that with this law, we are eliminating freedom of speech and press from the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. That was quite incorrect. This was a necessary precaution of the prosperity and stability of the nation. The Alien Act declared that if war between the United States and another country, the President shall publicly announce the war. However, one important aspect of our Acts comprised of the nature of immigrants. We firmly believe that in a time of war, all foreign males fourteen years old and older, who are not citizens of the United States, shall be removed as “alien enemies” (Alien Acts). This is necessary for the protection of our country and the success of our

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

189 Words | 1 Pages

On the other hand, Cornell explains that this “will of the people” was often contorted on both sides as political debate. Thus, the “dissenting tradition” was not more than who was more qualified to run the government through countless debates and public appeal. As explained by Cornell,”Each side expended enormous energy crafting appeals to persuade citizens that it was better qualified to represent the will of the people” (Cornell 21). Thus, the Anti-Federalists were using the people to debate themselves in the public sphere to gain the will of the common man and avoid the evil corrupt centralized authority.

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

438 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution was scribed subsequent to the delegation that occurred at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This document was intended to be an improvement of the Articles of Confederation, in which the ending result was an entirely new government called the republic. The idea of institutionalizing a constitution created differences between the participants of the meeting. Those who opposed the idea of a new government and the constitution were called the Antifederalists and those who supported the ratification of the Constitution were federalists, which is the idea of federalism vs. state’s rights. The Constitution failed to protect the rights of the civilians despite Federalists attempts to persuade individuals

Read More

How Are The Articles Of Confederation Justified Dbq

680 Words | 3 Pages

What made it justified was the understanding that there was a need for a new Constitution. While the people were stubborn in their wants, they could comprehend the fact that they were a complete mess. With this in mind, the allowed for the Constitution to take it's place, with some hesitation. The protection of the collective security could potentially harm that of their individual freedoms. With this concern in mind, the men behind the U.S. Constitution found a simple solution: put the people in power.

Read More

Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thomas Jefferson And The Federalist

1158 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Jefferson- one of the great American founding fathers with exquisite taste in architecture and French wine, but also known to hold a controversial set of ideas- fought frequently and strongly against the Federalists ideas before he achieved Presidency. Jefferson and the other republican democrats who followed suit held the belief that the powers of the federal government should be left strictly to what is granted to them in the Constitution. Those powers not specifically addressed in the Constitution would then be delegated to the state governments. This is to ensure that the federal government did not have too much power as they believe a country runs best under a form of self-government.

Read More

Federalist 10 Pros And Cons

968 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

Read More

Tyrany In The Virginia Resolutions

623 Words | 3 Pages

The constitution declares, “The liberty of conscience and the press cannot be cancelled, abridged, restrained, or modified, by any authority of the United States.” The Federalist disallows the American people the freedom of speech. Drawing back to Europe’s tyrannical ways that started the Revolution. History shows the importance of a government

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

254 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1790s two major parties dominated the political scene. Those parties were people who sided with Alexander Hamilton, known as “Federalists” while the people who supported Thomas Jefferson were the “Anti-Federalists”. During the conclusion of the table, it was quite evident that the Anti-Federalists were considered to be more liberal, or in a broader sense, Democratic than the other party at the time. This can be inferred through the notion that they supported France throughout the French Revolution because they hated Britain because they once controlled everything they did; while on the contrary, the Federalists, which consisted of mostly business people, supported Britain due to their importance in trades. They also were against the

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

Federalist 10 Pros And Cons

1069 Words | 5 Pages

Publius Few political figures have found themselves so deeply entrenched in the chambers of history, as to be known for virtually prophetic and forefront interpretations of their governments and societies. James Madison secured his place in that pedigree during post-revolutionary America through his work on the Federalist Papers, in which him and his compatriots argued for the ratification of the Constitution, which would lay out the principles for the organization and function of our government. While the Federalist Papers are a compilation of 85 essays, Federalist 10 stands out as being one of the most acclaimed and relevant pieces of Madison’s literary work. This kind of notoriety is owed to his keen analysis of the human tendency to form factions, and the ways in which a representative republic outlined in the constitution would be most effective in combating their adverse

Read More

Dbq Alien And Sedition Act Essay

613 Words | 3 Pages

Nevertheless, he considered such measures necessary in the conditions of war preparation since the act provided more rights not only to the federal government but also to President himself. From the point of view of a slave and rebel leader, this act could be considered inappropriate. According to a leader of rebel, the Sedition Act might be seen as violating “individual protections under the first amendment of the Constitution” ("The Alien And Sedition Acts [Ushistory. Org]").

Read More

Sedition Dbq

1155 Words | 5 Pages

The Alien and Seditionn Acts, as aforementioned, were established in 1789, shortly after the ratification of the Constitution on June 21, 1788. In the very first amendment of the constitution, it is stated that “Congress shall make no law respecting... or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”, and yet the Sedition Act directly opposes this notion by threatening any citizen who publishes a piece criticizing the government with fines or imprisonment, while the Naturalization and Alien Acts, although despicable, are technically not opposing the Constitution. The Federalists, who argued and fought for the ratification of the Constitution, almost immediately instate an act which directly disobeys the first amendment, in a petty attempt to gain leverage on the opposing party, the Democratic-Republicans. Although the Anti-Federalists, who later became the Democratic-Republicans, were those who desired The Bill of Rights, which includes the first amendment, this still does not undermine the hopes of the Federalists to ratify the finished constitution, nor does it excuse the violation of the constitution that the Sedition Act proposes.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Federalism

1823 Words | 8 Pages

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Read More

Federalist Party Assignment

706 Words | 3 Pages

AAS Political Science Unit 4 Assignment The Federalist Party Led by John Adams , Alexander hamilton, and john Marshall. Formed from the group that fought for a stronger Federal government before the ratification of the constitution. • Our first 2 president George Washington and John Adams were Federalists • Associated mostly with the rich and fought for industry rather than farming • Had a stronger alliance with Britain over France • Were is favor of a more central government than individual states The party split during the War of 1812.

Read More

Revolution Of 1800 Essay

1019 Words | 5 Pages

Influential public leaders who accepted the Federalist label included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton”. Federalists believed in a strong central government and believed in limiting who could participate in government. “(Federalists) its style was elitist, and its leaders scorned democracy, widespread suffrage, and open elections”.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Federalists

Related Topics

Open Document