ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Gerson Therapy

745 Words3 Pages

In today's world, new ways of curing cancers, such as melanoma; are being constantly studied and coming up with new ideas, these ideas are usually conventional such as common or other ways such as clinical trials. These are based on drugs and therapy focused killing the cancer cells but result in killing healthy cells as well. Gerson therapy is the best treatment for melanoma patient, because it not only has many benefits, it has a higher survival rate than conventional; but because it is unconventional, most people never are made aware of it. Not only does the Gerson therapy offer a great treatment it also has many benefit that follow it. With so many therapies using harmful drugs and radiation to kill of the cancer, the gerson therapy allows people to heal their body back to …show more content…

For stages 0-2 the rate of survival is 100% for gerson therapy, meaning when the melanom is in suti and not spread yet but is likely to soon, if the gerson therapy is followed appropriately than the result is total success. Where as stage 0-2 for conventional ways result in a 79% survival rate, which speaking from results is slightly different than gerson. For stages 3 A that has migrated to the lymph nodes or blood stream, gerson therapy has a 82% survival rate, whereas conventional has only a 39% survival rate. This is so significant since this stage is very difficult to overcome and become well again. This is when melanoma has spread to the bloodstream and lymph nodes moving toward infecting other organs in the body. Finally for stages 4A and 4B the conventional survival rate is 6% , while the gerson therapy has a significant amount of survivors at 39%. This is such a large spread since a person has a 33% better chance at surviving with gerson therapy than with conventional ways, because stage 4 is when other organs in the body have been invaded and infected by the melanoma

More about Pros And Cons Of Gerson Therapy

    Open Document