ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Hiring Private Security Officers

803 Words4 Pages

Private security officers are subject to being liable in several situations. They must understand the difference between having powers as police officers and serving in a private capacity. You can be accused of causing damage to people and then held monetarily liable to pay for damages. Third parties can present evidence that shows that a private security professional extended the power available to them and created a situation through an aggressive stance that caused damage to the property of a citizen.
This chapter will discuss how the principle of liability legally applies to certified private security officials. It also describes which kind of behavior can find you responsible for negligence, especially if you are off-duty and do not have …show more content…

There is an argument that private entities should not require policing functions, but we find that it is unavoidable not to require the additional security that can be offered by well-trained private security officials.
To avoid legal accountability, it is best that private security officers stay away from any use of force. This is a winning formula, but we find that using force becomes unavoidable even in the most mundane environments. However, the use of any force or even the implication of its use should always be employed when it is clear that it cannot have legal accountability. This is possible when you find a person engaged in an illegal activity, and there is already permissible evidence to present as a defensive argument when employing only the necessary force.
Remember, the purpose of private security is different from the police, where proactive action is possible for identifying criminal intent and stopping it before anything occurs. The legal practice of responsible action applies to private security professionals, who must not act until it is clear that they need to do something to ensure the safety of a place, as well as ensure that no person can come to any harm because of the irrational behavior of an …show more content…

Off-duty private security officers have very few rights in terms of using any element to carry out their activity. This is different from the powers of a police officer, who still remains in a significant position of power and decision-making when off-duty. Actively pursuing a troublemaker and making an arrest has different meanings for the police and a private security provider.
Sometimes, we may find that private security officials are already ones with immediate police experience. They understand the various police rights, but fail to recognize that they do not have the same power when they off-duty during the discharge of their private security duty. If organizations hire private security professionals, they must create and use a set of policies that empower these officers when they are present in a specific location or covering the interests of their employers as private security

Show More
Related
1438 Words | 6 Pages

To limit the liability of associated with armed guards, many companies rely on outside contractors. These contractors typically provide security officers with limited training and experience. It is a well-known fact, that the private security industry in America needs to be better regulated (Walter, 2015). Among security professional associations and organizations, the consensus is almost unanimous that security officer training and licensing standards need to be increased nationwide. The quality and training of security guards has sadly not improved much over the last 15 years (Henion, 2014).

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

Compl. at 7-8, 16. However, negligence cannot give rise to action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Williams v. Field, 416 F.2d 483, 485 (9th Cir. 1969). (“In order to be actionable under section 1983 … we believe that more than an isolated incident of negligent failure to protect must be alleged.

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

The Supreme Court in view of crime and other dangers-offers police mobility in containing crime. In response to the crime in the early 1960’s, Orlando W. Wilson states how police in order to discover and eliminate crime, they must have the authority to question suspects under “reasonable suspicion and search a suspect on reasonable ground.” Usually when a Police officer needs to hold someone in arrest or search a suspect they must have a warrant. This idea proposed by Wilson is to search or talk with a suspect without a warrant only when provided by reasoning that said suspect producing suspicious behavior. This may seem as too much power in the hands of the police but this suggestion does not justify searching anyone and everyone.

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Unit 4 DB 1 Knock-and-announce rule Introduction Officers today have a hard enough job, so in order for them to comply with certain rules they need to make sure that any type of warrant that are being served is correct. They also need to make sure they do not just enter any type of building without any form of announcement. This paper will discuss the knock-and-announce rule, the exceptions to the rule, and provide the response of how they interpret and apply the knock-and-announce rule. Explanation of the knock-and-announce rule Within the creation of the common law, the knock-and-announce rule was born.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

They argue that a suspect should be perceived as innocent until proven guilty (Shelden, 2006). Also, the police officers have undergone massive training on the rights of human beings. Rarely will a police officer use excessive force to control crime. Unless in self-defense or a situation where it is deemed necessary the policing has been ‘softer’ in this age in fighting crime as compared as it was then back in the

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

What authorities should have done, is have ‘front line policemen’ to face protesters, not a SWAT team”

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

When it comes to policing there is a huge struggle power struggle between individual rights and public order. You want to keep individual rights, but you also want to keep public order while keeping the public safe. It may seem hard to keep the balance between these two, but doing so is of utter importance. Here are some examples of why it can be hard to balance individual rights and public order when dealing with policing.

Read More
1872 Words | 8 Pages

There are many concerns for a working police officer in America. Officers can face several types of dangers while on duty. Most of the time when police officers sign up for their job they already have prior knowledge of the risk they may be taking. They represent the civil authority of the government. According to Rose Johnson, "The job of a police officer is risky, and officers incur a higher rate of illnesses and injury than the national average for other jobs.

Read More
1469 Words | 6 Pages

While advocates of stand your ground believe that it is empowering to people and is an enhancement of safety rights, critics believe that it can often be used as a racially motivated infringement on civil rights. A study of the racial and violent impacts of stand your ground at Texas A&M University found that murder increased by up to 8% in states that had adopted Stand your Ground laws. The conclusion was made that the implementation of these laws was a possible cause of increased homicide rates in these states. The increase in lethal force became seen as an inevitable effect of the stand your ground laws. Based on FBI crime statistics, it is more likely for white people’s actions to be found justifiable in the killing of a black person than it is for the case of black people killing white people.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Through research of a variety of articles, the legitimacy of racial profiling in policing is questioned. It is shown that racial profiling has significantly increased after attacks on the United States. All across the world,

Read More
1757 Words | 8 Pages

That’s a job for internal affairs and grand jury. I can say this: As a trained officer in Mental Health Officer Proficiency, I can tell you that I damn sure wouldn’t have been that close. I think I would have rounded the front of the car, and held distance, and I would have had my Taser ready, just because you are trained for dealing with mentally unstable individuals. He didn’t give himself a chance or this man a chance for a different outcome.” “Do you think the officer would have handled this differently if he was granted the opportunity of additional training like an MHU?”

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

“Where the Red Fern grows,” is a book and a movie. The movie and the book has the same scenes but the movie is missing some details. The book has more narration than the movie. The book in my opinion feels like I am there. It draws me in more than the movie does.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

According to www.ncjrs.gov the accountability of individual police officers is a fundamental issue for police executives. Police officers are the public officials that society has authorized, even obliged, to use force. Ensuring that police officers use that warrant equitably, legally, and economically on behalf of citizens is at the core of police administration.

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

When facing this issue, some people are to believe that cops have more important things to do, whether it be a larger, full-scale crime, or them just not caring. It is apparently believed that those working to fix issues regarding crime, have no taste for the smaller, “irrelevant” ones that face society frequently. Whereas the distrust in our safety system stems from is without reach of comprehension, but the fact of the matter still stands behind the fallacies. Cops, although given a bad reputation through movies and society, have a job to prevent and fix any crimes that come their way, large-scale or small-scale. The small misbehaviors that

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

General issues of police forces. The importance of public image to the organization An unfavorable image can affect how the police perform their duties (Goldsmith, 2003): citizens are reluctant to address the police in problematic situations (Davis & Henderson, 2003; Tyler, 2006), to voluntary cooperate with the police forces (Huq, Tyler & Schulhofer, 2011; Tyler & Fagan, 2008) or to positively respond to the various police requests (Bradford & Jackson, 2010; Jackson, Hough, Bradford, Hohl & Kuha, 2012). The more so, in terms of the general public there is no "effective or real police action " that can be separated from the image people hold on the police activity (Salmi, Voeten & Keskinen 2000 ). In addition, in the absence of a favorable image we cannot talk about a consented police act (Goldsmith, 2005).

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Hiring Private Security Officers

Related Topics

Open Document