Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

I like most the idea of Locke, It consisted that all the humans had rights. Which they were the right to life, liberty and property. He also believes in government with a limit of power and that was accepted by all citizens. And ending with his idea we can see he has something clear "if a government fails it obligations or violates human natural life."I like most this idea because in my personal opinion if this idea could work, in this countries that aren't in good moment including Honduras everything would be different. I will relate this with Honduras if people had their rights and specially If this governments had a limited power because they don't have it because they abuse of it it will ben a great country. But also I like this idea because it complete because it include from the government to the citizen. What this idea talk about the citizens is that those governors that will have "limited power"

Because this idea is all the contrary of Locke's idea. Because basically Hobbes thinks in a powerful government and not in the citizen. Most of people do not think in the part that the people chose the governors, and that they need no make all for the citizens. They think only of them and not of the same people that chose them. They forget about their rights obviously according to Hobbes idea they do not have a limited of power as the idea of Locke. In my opinion this idea wouldn't work

Locke, John Locke was born in August 29 1632, and died on October 28 1704 in United Kingdom. He had a more optimistic optimistic of human nature his view. In his idea of the enlightenment it says they everybody had certain rights which they are, right to life, right to property, right to liberty. He argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights. So his idea was based that the best type of government has limited power and was accepted by the citizens. In less words Locke rejected the thing of