Supreme Court is a powerful justice system, whenever someone has to come there to be judged for some reason, it reveals that everything happens at this time is not normal like those civil court cases in “Judge Judy”, “Guilty or Not Guilty”, “Judge Joe Brown” or Judge Rinder. As you can see, how hard that the judge has to identify all information as well as evidence, then leads to the final decision; Supreme Court is the one reflects the higher level of court, more complicated and serious than that entertainment you watch on TV. According to US history, there is a thousand cases happened which attracted a million people to pay attention to and may not miss every single minute of it, such as Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 (Denied citizenship to …show more content…
As such, many legitimate powers of government are implied by the Constitution. The defender_ Maryland said that they taxed on the national bank but was unconstitutional. On the other hand, working as a sovereign State, Maryland was vested by its people with all authority to regulate business and to tax institutions inside its borders to gain their benefits and motivate country into a betterment. In the reality, the regulation of banks was accepted as a necessary means to prevent financial abuses and prevent ¨Black Friday¨ (bankrupt, bank crisis, social problems which related to money circumstance) as well as create a submitted which runs the money float easily and controls people’s tax properly. Since the Federal Government had denounced a number of statutes to regulate State banks. …show more content…
Immediately, a series of anger newspaper responses followed from Judge Spencer Roane, Judge William Brockenbrough and former U.S. Senator John Taylor gained a huge counterargument against him. Otherwise, Marshall did not let the articles go unanswered and ravenous, but in a while he responded under "A Friend of the Union," in Philadelphia because the paper did not print his responses in their entirety, he republished them in Virginia under the name "A Friend of the Constitution." again which eased the anger some advocates as well as people at that time. Later, in 1832, Andrew Jackson dismantled the bank. Despite this action, the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution was upheld until