ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Killing The Mytileneans

500 Words2 Pages

I would argue that the argument pertaining to sparing the Mytileneans was not one of idealistic morality, but rather one of non-interventionism (to some degree). The argument was not that the Mytileneans should be killed due to the fact that it was “wrong”, or that the Athenians had a moral obligation to spare them, but rather that it would not be in the best interest of the Athenians to commit such a deed (which was exemplified by Diodotus, as you have stated). It was argued that if punishing the Myteleneans was not to positively impact the Athenians’ situation, then the Mytileneans should not be executed. Although not explicitly stated, killing the Mytileneans would demonstrate the violent hegemony incessantly perpetuated by Athens, leading to growing resentment among the populations subjugated by the Athenians. As a result, said populations may eventually conspire to overthrow the ruling state when the opportunity arises, which would be detrimental to the prosperity of Athens. Both arguments were extensions of enacting a policy that was pragmatic in nature. …show more content…

Although the Athenians utilized brute force as a means to expand their “empire”, said force inherently resulted in the construction of a powerful entity supported only by the tenuous subservience of populations subjugated by the state. A similar parallel can be drawn to the way in which the Neo-Assyrians extended their empire, and how it fell. Furthermore, the utilization of force to extend one’s sphere of influence, while ostensibly realistic before and during its implementation, will ultimately lead to the downfall of any state that incorporates such a practice into its diplomatic

Show More
Related
677 Words | 3 Pages

Communications and diplomacy is essential to the success of two societies that come to interact, especially when the peoples are so different as the Pamunkeys and the English colonies of Jamestown were. When societies share knowledge, resources, and goodwill, they build not only a better present but also a stable future. However, when they try to take advantage of each other by force, they bring instability to their people and those around them. A poignant lesson of this is seen in the interactions between the English and the Pamunkey people in the early 17th century.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

The Barbarians were able to conquer the greatest amount of land in history. The question remains, however, with their amount of conquest, how savage were they? Despite the Barbarians’ positive influence to civilizations, their bloody, seemingly merciless conquests, outweigh the limited and sometimes even insignificant influences to other civilizations. The Barbarians’ army was merciless even to their fellow soldiers.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

Armesto illustrates this with a range of examples, including the rise and fall of empires, the impact of technological innovations, and the influence of cultural exchange. The book also emphasizes the importance of understanding the interconnectedness of civilizations. Armesto argues that no civilization exists in isolation and that the history of human societies is characterized by a complex web of interactions and exchanges. This is particularly relevant in today's globalized world, where the actions of one civilization can have far-reaching consequences for others.

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

During the premodern era, a multitude of compelling forces drove the establishment of civilizations, nations, and empires, each of which contributed to a complex historical evolution. The early demand for safety and security among civilians resulted in the formation of communities, as evidenced by the Assyrian and Babylonian empires, where cooperation was crucial for defense against outside threats. Economic factors were also important, as shown by the Kingdom of Kush, as nations looked to develop trade routes and manage resources to increase wealth and power. Furthermore, cultural and ideological components like common practices and religious convictions promoted harmony and cohesion within societies. This paper will make the case that the

Read More
1133 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history, people had a desire for power and abused their power. Power is a significant enduring issue because it led to events that had huge effects on the world such as the Qin dynasty of ShiHuangdi’s ruling, Autocrats,

Read More
1494 Words | 6 Pages

Both the United States invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the French invasion of Egypt in 1798 demonstrated recurring themes and issues that take place when native populations are occupied by more powerful nations. Because the operations took place more than two centuries apart from one another, physical differences between the two invasions can be seen quickly and clearly, while more subtle psychological similarities between the two empires are harder to analyze. One would think that two hundred years of progress would put an end to the reappearing tragedies of violent conflict, but the personal qualities of humans constantly reappear. Throughout the events of both the U.S. invasion of Iraq and French invasion of Egypt, key differences between operational

Read More
186 Words | 1 Pages

But, the figures of the Enlightenment have shaken the very foundation of nations, and different governments have come to power. New and bright leaders seek power and glory. An imperialist fervour has descended upon the peoples of Altera, as nations scramble to build their empires, competing with their rivals for land and resources. In this brutal world, survival of the fittest is an absolute truth.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

In this essay I will argue that the Principate is a history of military dictatorships insofar as certain emperors seize power via military means or emphasise a connexion to the army. I have chosen to define military dictatorship as a form of governance which relies on the usurpation of power by means of war, assassination and the consolidation of that power by the founding of dynasties which are, in essence, based around the current princeps’ choice of electing their own successors. Furthermore, I shall analyse emperors via the themes, bread and circuses, the army and Praetorian Guard, and accession: defeat and adoption. The first theme I shall look at is the army and Praetorian Guard.

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

It is interesting to point out that the Athenians start out by leaving justice out of the argument because they say they are not equal because they are much more powerful than the Melians and that justice is only power between equals (1). They leave justice out because they know they would lose the argument of justice against the Melians. They selfishly state that it is only good for themselves that they conquer the city but keep it intact (2). Furthermore, they say it is to their benefit if they give in even though the Athenians would benefit from it the most (2). However, they explicitly demonstrate the Machiavellian principle by appearing to benefit the Melians but not wanting to be friends because they seek it necessary to hate Melos to

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

What is interesting here is that the law gives protection to all, but a penalty can be exacted only through a citizen’s intervention. This is similar a slave would expect court to play out for them, they would rely on their master to represent them in court. With this law metic’s inferior status is marked out. They had to rely on someone else’s intervention in court, and in the case of this law he or she was no better off than a slave; with the Athenian citizen being their master. Penalties were also significantly different, a killer of a metic was exiled while the murderer of a citizen was sent to death.

Read More
1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

To begin, the foundation of every government’s power has always been fear. Governments depend on public fear to secure societal position. Tracing back to thousands of years ago, governments relied primarily on conquests. The research author Robert Higgs argues, “Losers who were not slain in the conquest itself had to endure the consequent rape and pillage and in the long term to acquiesce in the continuing payment of tribute to the insistent rulers.” In other words, Higgs’s point emphasizes that the government violently conquested lands and hence attacked people living there in the old times.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Examining the history of colonial expansions, one can discern a rough but generally applicable pattern for the revolutionary subversion of non-Western societies. “Subversion began at the apex, with the defeat, humiliation, or overthrow of traditional rulers” (Reilly, 2000, p. 623; von Sivers, Desnoyers, & Stow, 2012). This was of vital assurance of law and order. With it went continuity of tradition, not only of governance but for all other social institutions, even consuming the subtle customs regulating the human psyche.(Reilly, 2000)Thus ended not only political, but also cultural determination. A new world emerged.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

I think that there is a fallacy of irrelevance. In the book, Socrates sets out to defend the idea that it is always in one’s best interest to be just and to act justly and he suggests that the just person as one who has a balanced soul will lead one to act justly or why mental health amounts to justice. I feel that justice includes actions in relation to others, it includes considerations of other people’s good, and includes strong motivations not to act unjustly. I believe that Socrates’ defense of justice does not include constraining reasons to think that a person with a balanced soul will refrain from acts that are commonly thought to be unjust like theft, murder, and adultery.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

It believes that all individuals are born with an increasing desire to own power hardwired inside them. In these circumstances dominant states should do direct high power over their rivals. In the other hand, structural realism does not define the quest for power, instead it is focused on the structure of the international

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Killing The Mytileneans

Related Topics

Open Document